| Literature DB >> 33918880 |
Carmen Elena Condrat1,2, Valentin Nicolae Varlas3, Florentina Duică2, Panagiotis Antoniadis4, Cezara Alina Danila2, Dragos Cretoiu2,5, Nicolae Suciu2,6,7, Sanda Maria Crețoiu5, Silviu Cristian Voinea8.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small vesicles ranging from 20-200 nm to 10 μm in diameter that are discharged and taken in by many different types of cells. Depending on the nature and quantity of their content-which generally includes proteins, lipids as well as microRNAs (miRNAs), messenger-RNA (mRNA), and DNA-these particles can bring about functional modifications in the receiving cells. During pregnancy, placenta and/or fetal-derived EVs have recently been isolated, eliciting interest in discovering their clinical significance. To date, various studies have associated variations in the circulating levels of maternal and fetal EVs and their contents, with complications including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, ultimately leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Furthermore, EVs have also been identified as messengers and important players in viral infections during pregnancy, as well as in various congenital malformations. Their presence can be detected in the maternal blood from the first trimester and their level increases towards term, thus acting as liquid biopsies that give invaluable insight into the status of the feto-placental unit. However, their exact roles in the metabolic and vascular adaptations associated with physiological and pathological pregnancy is still under investigation. Analyzing peer-reviewed journal articles available in online databases, the purpose of this review is to synthesize current knowledge regarding the utility of quantification of pregnancy related EVs in general and placental EVs in particular as non-invasive evidence of placental dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and to develop the current understanding of these particles and their applicability in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: extracellular vesicles; gestation; liquid biopsy; placenta; pregnancy disorders
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33918880 PMCID: PMC8068855 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Markers that confirm the presence of EVs.
| Category I | Category II | Category III |
|---|---|---|
| GPI-anchored or transmembrane proteins, demonstrating the lipid bilayer of the EV | Cytosolic proteins in eukaryotic cells and Gram-positive bacteria | Constituents of non-EV factors that help evaluate the degree of contamination of the sample (e.g., APOA1/2, APOB, albumin, UMOD) |
GPI: glycosylphosphatidylinositol; APOA1/2, APOB: apolipoproteins A1/2 and B; UMOD: uromodulin.
Isolation methods used in the detection of pregnancy-related EVs.
| Biological Sample | Potential Interfering Factors | Isolation, Separation and Concentration Techniques | Characteristics | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma/serum of pregnant women | Pre-/postprandial status | Differential centrifugation | Standard protocol for EVs isolation from biological fluids. | [ |
| Fluid from cultured placental tissue explants | Specific infectious and noninfectious diseases | Differential centrifugations | Used to study the composition and biological roles of placental EVs in normal and pathological pregnancies. | [ |
| Placental perfusate | Specific infectious and noninfectious diseases | Differential centrifugation | Biological products accessible only after delivery | [ |
Methods for the detection and confirmation of pregnancy-related EVs.
| Detection/Confirmation Techniques | Characteristics | References |
|---|---|---|
| Flow cytometry | Not selective enough to analyze membrane and non-membrane structures, as it detects all particles with CD81, CD9, and CD63 markers | [ |
| Western blot | Most commonly used technique, although not selective enough | [ |
| Fluorescence nanoparticle tracking analysis (fl-NTA) | Typically used to determine PLAP-positive EVs, thus reliably identifying STBMV | [ |
| Imaging techniques such as electron microscopy, immunoelectron microscopy, scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), scanning probe microscopy (SPM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), super-resolution microscopy (SRM) | Used to visualize single EVs at high resolution, providing information on their structure and composition, especially when combined with antibody-mediated detection of EVs components | [ |
Role of placental EVs during different pregnancy states.
| Pregnancy State | Role of Placental Extracellular Vesicles |
|---|---|
| Normal pregnancy | Promotion of embryonic implantation and placental development |
| Systemic inflammation | Induction of inflammation through altered cargo composition |
| Gestational hypertension | Increased release during PE |
| Gestational diabetes mellitus | Increased release during GDM |
| Viral infections | Inclusion of anti-viral agents, such as LC3, UVRAG, ATG4C, and IFN-λ1 |
| Fetal growth restriction | Increased ratio of placental to total exosomes |
HMG: high mobility group; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor α; GM-CSF: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IFN-γ: interferon γ; IL: interleukin; PE: preeclampsia; MSIR: maternal systemic inflammatory response; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; IR: insulin resistance; LC3: microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; UVRAG: UV radiation resistance-associated gene; ATG4C: autophagy related 4C cysteine peptidase.
Diagnostic criteria for hypertension.
| Organization | Number of Measure-Ments | Hyper-Tension | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Emergent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACOG, 2019 | 2 (minimum 4 h apart) | SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg | - | - | SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg | - |
| Regitz-Zagrosek, V.; et al. ESC, 2018 | - | SBP ≥ 140–159 and DBP ≥ 90–109 mmHg | - | SBP ≥ 160 mmHg or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg | SBP ≥ 170 mmHg or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg | |
| Magee, L.A.; et al. SOGC, 2014 | 2 (minimum 15 min apart) | - | - | SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg | - | |
| Redman, C.W. RCOG, 2011 | - | SBP ≥ 140–149 and DBP ≥ 90–99 mmHg | SBP ≥ 150–159 and DBP ≥ 100–109 mmHg | SBP ≥ 160 and DBP ≥ 110 mmHg | - |
Diagnostic thresholds for the classification of hypertension as mild, moderate, severe or emergent. ACOG: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ESC: European Society of Cardiology, SOGC: Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, ISSHP: International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, RCOG: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Diagnostic criteria for GDM.
| Organization | Year | Fasting (mg/dL) | 1 h (mg/dL) | 2 h (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADA | 2018 [ | 95 | 180 | 155 |
| ADIPS | 2014 [ | 92 | 180 | 153 |
| FIGO | 2015 [ | 92 | 180 | 153 |
| WHO | 1998 [ | 126 | – | 140 |
| WHO | 2013 [ | 92 | 180 | 153 |
| IADPSG | 2010 [ | 92 | 180 | 153 |
Glucose concentration thresholds in serum, above which a hyperglycemia is considered overt diabetes. The diagnostic Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) is performed during a fasting period and after injection of 75 g of glucose (after 1 and 2 h). ADA: American Diabetes Association, ADIPS: Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society, FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, WHO: World Health Organization, IADPSG: International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups.
Figure 1GDM prevalence in 11 European countries.
Figure 2Mean GDM prevalence and 95% CI in: (a) 11 European countries; (b) Northern, Western, and Southern Europe.