RATIONALE: Analyses of circulating cell membrane-derived microvesicles (MV) have come under scrutiny as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of disease. However, methods to isolate, label and quantify MV have been neither systematized nor validated. OBJECTIVE: To determine how pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors affect plasma MV counts, markers for cell of origin and expression of procoagulant surface phosphatidylserine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes. Effects of blood sample collection, anticoagulant and sample processing to platelet free plasma (PFP), and MV isolation, staining and storage (freeze-thaw) and cytometer design were evaluated with replicate samples from these populations. The key finding is that use of citrate or EDTA anticoagulants decreases or eliminates microvesicles from plasma by inducing adhesion of the microvesicles to platelets or other formed elements. Protease inhibitor anticoagulants, including heparin, preserve MV counts. A centrifugation protocol was developed in which recovery of isolated MV was high with resolution down to the equivalent light scatter of 0.2 μm latex beads. Each procedure was systematically evaluated for its impact on the MV counts and characteristics. CONCLUSION: This study provides a systematic methodology for MV isolation, identification and quantification, essential for development of MV as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of disease.
RATIONALE: Analyses of circulating cell membrane-derived microvesicles (MV) have come under scrutiny as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of disease. However, methods to isolate, label and quantify MV have been neither systematized nor validated. OBJECTIVE: To determine how pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors affect plasma MV counts, markers for cell of origin and expression of procoagulant surface phosphatidylserine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from healthy volunteers and patients with cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes. Effects of blood sample collection, anticoagulant and sample processing to platelet free plasma (PFP), and MV isolation, staining and storage (freeze-thaw) and cytometer design were evaluated with replicate samples from these populations. The key finding is that use of citrate or EDTA anticoagulants decreases or eliminates microvesicles from plasma by inducing adhesion of the microvesicles to platelets or other formed elements. Protease inhibitor anticoagulants, including heparin, preserve MV counts. A centrifugation protocol was developed in which recovery of isolated MV was high with resolution down to the equivalent light scatter of 0.2 μm latex beads. Each procedure was systematically evaluated for its impact on the MV counts and characteristics. CONCLUSION: This study provides a systematic methodology for MV isolation, identification and quantification, essential for development of MV as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of disease.
Authors: Muthuvel Jayachandran; Robert D Litwiller; Whyte G Owen; John A Heit; Thomas Behrenbeck; Sharon L Mulvagh; Philip A Araoz; Matthew J Budoff; S Mitchell Harman; Virginia M Miller Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-07-11 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Virginia M Miller; Brian D Lahr; Kent R Bailey; Howard N Hodis; Sharon L Mulvagh; Muthuvel Jayachandran Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Johnny C Akers; Valya Ramakrishnan; Ryan Kim; Shirley Phillips; Vivek Kaimal; Ying Mao; Wei Hua; Isaac Yang; Chia-Chun Fu; John Nolan; Ichiro Nakano; Yuanfan Yang; Martin Beaulieu; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Virginia M Miller; Vesna D Garovic; Kent R Bailey; Brian D Lahr; Michelle M Mielke; Wendy M White; Muthuvel Jayachandran Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Heather C Inglis; Ali Danesh; Avani Shah; Jacques Lacroix; Philip C Spinella; Philip J Norris Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Sarwat I Gilani; Ulrik Dolberg Anderson; Muthuvel Jayachandran; Tracey L Weissgerber; Ladan Zand; Wendy M White; Natasa Milic; Maria Lourdes Gonzalez Suarez; Rangit Reddy Vallapureddy; Åsa Nääv; Lena Erlandsson; John C Lieske; Joseph P Grande; Karl A Nath; Stefan R Hansson; Vesna D Garovic Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Thomas De Luca; Keely L Szilágyi; Katherine A Hargreaves; Kimberly S Collins; Eric A Benson Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Anudeep Yekula; Koushik Muralidharan; Keiko M Kang; Lan Wang; Leonora Balaj; Bob S Carter Journal: Methods Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.608