Literature DB >> 25104112

Placenta-derived exosomes continuously increase in maternal circulation over the first trimester of pregnancy.

Suchismita Sarker, Katherin Scholz-Romero, Alejandra Perez, Sebastian E Illanes, Murray D Mitchell, Gregory E Rice, Carlos Salomon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human placenta releases specific nanovesicles (i.e. exosomes) into the maternal circulation during pregnancy, however, the presence of placenta-derived exosomes in maternal blood during early pregnancy remains to be established. The aim of this study was to characterise gestational age related changes in the concentration of placenta-derived exosomes during the first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. from 6 to 12 weeks) in plasma from women with normal pregnancies.
METHODS: A time-series experimental design was used to establish pregnancy-associated changes in maternal plasma exosome concentrations during the first trimester. A series of plasma were collected from normal healthy women (10 patients) at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks of gestation (n = 70). We measured the stability of these vesicles by quantifying and observing their protein and miRNA contents after the freeze/thawing processes. Exosomes were isolated by differential and buoyant density centrifugation using a sucrose continuous gradient and characterised by their size distribution and morphology using the nanoparticles tracking analysis (NTA; Nanosight™) and electron microscopy (EM), respectively. The total number of exosomes and placenta-derived exosomes were determined by quantifying the immunoreactive exosomal marker, CD63 and a placenta-specific marker (Placental Alkaline Phosphatase PLAP).
RESULTS: These nanoparticles are extraordinarily stable. There is no significant decline in their yield with the freeze/thawing processes or change in their EM morphology. NTA identified the presence of 50-150 nm spherical vesicles in maternal plasma as early as 6 weeks of pregnancy. The number of exosomes in maternal circulation increased significantly (ANOVA, p = 0.002) with the progression of pregnancy (from 6 to 12 weeks). The concentration of placenta-derived exosomes in maternal plasma (i.e. PLAP+) increased progressively with gestational age, from 6 weeks 70.6 ± 5.7 pg/ml to 12 weeks 117.5 ± 13.4 pg/ml. Regression analysis showed that weeks is a factor that explains for >70% of the observed variation in plasma exosomal PLAP concentration while the total exosome number only explains 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: During normal healthy pregnancy, the number of exosomes present in the maternal plasma increased significantly with gestational age across the first trimester of pregnancy. This study is a baseline that provides an ideal starting point for developing early detection method for women who subsequently develop pregnancy complications, clinically detected during the second trimester. Early detection of women at risk of pregnancy complications would provide an opportunity to develop and evaluate appropriate intervention strategies to limit acute adverse sequel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25104112      PMCID: PMC4283151          DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med        ISSN: 1479-5876            Impact factor:   5.531


Background

The placenta plays a pivotal role in mediating maternal adaptation to pregnancy as well as regulating fetal growth and development. Pregnancy-induced changes are affected by the release of soluble autacoids as early as 6 to 8 weeks of gestation [1, 2] and the invasion of placental cells into the maternal tissues to modify maternal immune, cardiovascular and metabolic activities. Recently, we and others [3-7] have identified an additional pathway by which the placenta communicates with the maternal system to induce changes during pregnancy-placental exosomal signalling. Exosomes are bilipid membrane-bound nanovesicles (50–120 nm diameter) that are actively released (via exocytosis) from cells into the extracellular space and body fluids under physiological and pathophysiological conditions [8]. Their molecular cargo of proteins, microRNAs, mRNAs and lipids appear to be selectively packaged by the late endosomal system to regulate the phenotype of target cells [3, 4, 6]. Recent studies have highlighted the putative utility of tissue-specific nanovesicles (e.g. exosomes) in the diagnosis of disease onset and treatment monitoring [4, 9, 10]. Previously, we have established that placental cells release exosomes in response to changes in the extracellular milieu (including oxygen tension and glucose concentration) and that placental cell-derived exosomes regulate target cell migration and invasion [3, 4]. In addition, we have identified placental-derived exosomes in maternal blood and reported that the concentration of placental exosomes in the maternal blood increases during normal, healthy pregnancy [7]. During early placentation, the cytotrophoblast cells form a highly invasive extravillous trophoblast that can migrate into the decidua and invade the first third of the myometrium, inducing remodelling of spiral arterioles to produce low-resistance vascular system, essential for fetal development [11]. The relative reduction of utero-placental flow caused by abnormal placentation triggers the development of placental originated diseases such as preeclampsia. Available data suggest that the concentrations of placental-derived exosomes in the maternal blood could be a potential marker of abnormal placentation [12, 13]. Early detection of disease risk and onset is the first step in implementing efficacious treatment and improving patient outcome. To date, the concentration profile of placenta-derived exosomes in the maternal blood during first trimester has not been established. Until this profile is defined, the utility of placental exosomes as an early biomarker for placental dysfunction will remain equivocal. In this study, therefore, a time-series experimental design was used to test the hypothesis that the concentration of placental exosomes in the maternal plasma of normal healthy women changes during the early pregnancy state (i.e. 6–12 weeks).

Methods

Patient selection and sample collection

A time-series experimental design was used to establish the variation in plasma exosome characteristics during normal pregnancy. All experimental procedures were conducted within an ISO17025 accredited (National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia) research facility. All data were recorded within a 21 CERF part 11 compliant electronic laboratory notebook (Iris note, Redwood City, CA, USA). Plasma samples were collected from 10 women during their first trimester of pregnancy. All patients were enrolled with informed consent and underwent routine obstetrical care at the Hospital Parroquial de San Bernardo (Santiago, Chile). Estimation of gestational age was made based on the first day of their last menstrual period and confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at the recruitment (i.e. 6 weeks). Each patient, gave consent to have weekly blood sample collection between 6 and 12 weeks of gestation (n = 70, 10 patients with weekly blood collection at 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 weeks of pregnancy). The protocol of the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile). Obstetrical history and physical findings were recorded regarding previous spontaneous abortions, course of previous pregnancies, hypertension, gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected in EDTA treated tubes (BD Vacutainer® Plus plastic plasma tube) from which plasma samples were obtained by centrifugation at 2000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. The plasma samples were stored in aliquots at −80°C until analysed (not more than three months).

Exosome isolation

Exosomes were isolated as previously described [3, 4, 7, 14]. Briefly, plasma from each patient was utilised to isolate exosomes. Plasma (2.5 ml) was diluted with equal volume of PBS (pH 7.4) and exosomes were isolated through differential centrifugation, microfiltration and buoyant density ultracentrifugation. Centrifugation was initially performed at 2,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ins., Asheville, NC, USA, Sorvall®, high speed microcentrifuge, fixed rotor angle: 90°) followed by 12,000 × g at 4°C for 45 min to sediment cell nuclei, mitochondria and debris. The supernatant fluid (~5 ml) was transferred to an ultracentrifuge tube (Ultracrimp tubes, Thermo Fisher Scientific Ins., Asheville, NC, USA) and was centrifuged at 200,000 × g at 4°C for 2 h (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ins., Asheville, NC, USA, Sorvall®, T-8100, fixed angle ultracentrifuge rotor). The pellet was suspended in PBS (5 ml) and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (SteritopTM, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The filtrate was centrifuged at 200,000 × g at 4°C for 70 min (Thermo Fisher Scientific Ins., Asheville, NC, USA, Sorvall®, T-8100, fixed angle ultracentrifuge rotor) and the pellet resuspended in 2.5 M sucrose (4 ml).

Purification of exosomes using a continuous sucrose gradient

The resuspended 200,000 g pellet in 2.5 M sucrose was added at the bottom of an ultracentrifuge tube. A continuous sucrose gradient (26 ml; 0.25-2.5 M) was made above 4 ml of exosome suspension using a Hoefer SG30 gradient maker (GE Healthcare, NSW, Australia) and centrifuged at 110,000 g for 20 h (Sorvall, SureSpin™ 630/360, Swinging-Bucket ultracentrifuge rotor). Fractions (10 in total, 3 ml each) were collected automatically using a Pulse-Free Flow Peristaltic Pump with a flow rate range of 3 ml per min (GILSON Miniplus® model 3) and the Fraction Collector (GILSON FC 203B model). The density of each fraction was determined using the refraction index with OPTi digital refractometer (Bellingham + Stanley Inc., Lawrenceville, GA, USA). The coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 8% for the density of each fraction. Fractions (3 ml each) were diluted in PBS (60 ml) and then centrifuged at 200,000 × g for 70 min. The 200,000 g pellet was resuspended in 50 μl PBS and stored at −80°C. Exosomal protein concentrations were determined by a colorimetric assay (DC™ Protein Assay, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) [4].

Identification of nanoparticles by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)

NTA measurements were performed using a NanoSight NS500 instrument (NanoSight NTA 2.3 Nanoparticle Tracking and Analysis Release Version Build 0033) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The NanoSight NS500 instrument measured the rate of Brownian motion of nanoparticles in a light scattering system that provides a reproducible platform for specific and general nanoparticle characterization (NanoSight Ltd., Amesbury, United Kingdom). Samples were processed in duplicates and diluted with PBS over a range of concentrations to obtain between 10 and 100 particles per image (optimal ~50 particles x image) before analysing with NTA system. The samples were mixed before introducting into the chamber (temperature: 25°C and viscosity: 0.89 cP) and the camera level set to obtain image that has sufficient contrast to clearly identify particles while minimizing background noise a video recording (camera level: 10 and capture duration: 60 s). The captured videos (2 videos per sample) were then processed and analysed. A combination of high shutter speed (450) and gain (250) followed by manual focusing enabled optimum visualization of a maximum number of vesicles. We included a minimum of 200 tracks completed per video in duplicates. NTA post acquisition settings were optimized and kept constant between samples (Frames Processed: 1496 of 1496, Frames per Second: 30, camera shutter: 20 ms; Calibration: 139 nm/pixel, Blur: 3×3; Detection Threshold: 10; Min Track Length: Auto; Min Expected Size: Auto), and each video was then analyzed to give the mean, mode, and median particles size together with an estimate of the number of particles. An Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington) was also automatically generated, showing the concentration at each particle size.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

For the TEM analysis, exosome pellets (as described above, 30 μg protein) were fixed in 3% (w/v) glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3. Exosome samples were then applied to a continuous carbon grid and negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate. The samples were examined in an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI™, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) in the Central Analytical Research Facility, Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) (see Acknowledgements).

Quantification of placental cell-derived exosome

The concentration of exosomes in maternal circulation was expressed as the total immunoreactive exosomal CD63 (ExoELISA™, System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Briefly, 10 μg of exosomal protein was immobilised in 96-well microtiter plates and incubated overnight (binding step). Plates were washed three times for 5 min using a wash buffer solution and then incubated with exosome specific primary antibody (CD63) at room temperature (RT) for 1 h under agitation. Plates were washed and incubated with secondary antibody (1:5000) at RT 1 h under agitation. Plates were washed and incubated with Super-sensitive TMB ELISA substrate at RT for 45 min under agitation. The reaction was terminated using Stop Buffer solution. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The number of exosomes/ml, (ExoELISA™ kit) was obtained using an exosomal CD63 standard curve calibrated against nanoparticle tracking data (i.e. number of exosomes, NanoSight™). For placental cell-derived exosomes, the concentration of exosomal PLAP was quantified using a commercial ELISA kit (MYBioSource MBS701995, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions (detection range: 84–2000 pg/ml; sensitivity: 34 pg/ml; intra-assay precision within an assay: CV% < 10%; inter-assay between assays: CV% < 15%) Briefly, 10 μg of exosomal protein was added to each well of a 96-well microtitre plate and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Plates were washed three times while shaking for 20 s and 50 μl of HRP-conjugate was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. Plates were washed and incubated with 50 μl of substrate A and 50 μl of substrate B at 37°C for 15 min. The incubation was terminated using 50 μl of stop solution at RT for 2 min under agitation. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Exosomal PLAP was expressed as pg PLAP /ml plasma.

Stability of the exosomal quantification

To determine the stability of the exosomes during freeze-thaw cycles, fresh plasma (5.0 ml) from healthy women were obtained and divided into two 2.5 ml samples (A and B). Exosomes were immediately isolated from the first aliquot (A: fresh plasma) by differential and buoyant density centrifugation and then characterised by the number of exosome particles using an ELISA kit (ExoELISA™, System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), morphologically by electron microscope, microRNA content by real time PCR and protein profiling by mass-spectrometry. Sample B plasma was stored at −80°C for 2 months (B: frozen plasma), prior to exosome isolation and characterisation. miRNA isolation: miRNA were isolated from exosome particles as we have previously described [14]. Ambion mirVana PARIS Kit (Invitrogen, USA) was used to extract exosomal total RNA from fresh and frozen plasma by following the manufacturer’s procedure. Exosomes were first lysed by adding cell disruption buffer and vortexed or pipetted vigorously. Denaturing solution was added to samples and incubated on ice for 5 min. The first two steps stabilize RNA and inactivate RNases. The lysate is then subjected to Acid-Phenol:Chloroform extraction by adding Acid-Phenol:Chloroform, vortexed and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. Recovery of the aqueous phase obtains semi-pure RNA samples, removing most of the other cellular components. 100% ethanol was mixed and passed through a filter cartilage. The filter was washed three times and the RNA was eluted with nuclease-free water. Real-time PCR: Reverse transcription was performed using the miScript Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) in a total volume of 20 μl. cDNA was synthesised from the maximum volume of exosomal RNA (12 μl) using the BIO-RAD T100™ Thermal Cycler (USA) running for 60 min at 37°C, 5 min for 95°C and 60 min for 37°C. As the control, RNase-free water was added as the RNA template. Real-time PCR was performed with miScript SYBR Green Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). Forward primers (miScript primer assays, QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) designed to detect the housekeeping gene, human RNU6-2 (RNU6B) was used. The reactions were performed in triplicate using the BIO-RAD iQ™5 Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System (USA) with the following conditions: 94°C for 3 min, 35 amplification cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, 72°C for 10 min, 12°C for ∞ min. Proteomic analysis of exosomes by mass spectrometry (MS): We utilised a Liquid Chromatography (LC) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) LC/MS/MS instrumentation available within the University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research (5500qTRAP and 5600 Triple TOF) to undertake in depth quantitative proteomic analysis of the exosome samples (isolated from fresh and frozen plasma) to determine the proteome of exosomes as we have previously published [4]. Briefly, exosomes were adjusted to 8 M urea in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.5, and reduced with tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (5 mM) at room temperature for 1 h. Proteins were then alkylated in 10 mM IAA for 1 h in the dark. The sample was diluted 1:10 with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and then digested with trypsin (20 μg) at 37°C for 18 h. The samples were dried by centrifugal evaporation to remove the acetonitrile and then redissolved in Solvent A. The digested protein samples were analysed using a 5600 Triple TOF mass spectrometer (ABSciex) to obtain initial high mass accuracy survey MS/MS data, identifing the peptides present in the samples. The in depth proteomic analysis was performed using the Information Dependent Acquisition (IDA) experiments on the 5600 Triple TOF MS and utilized an enhanced MS survey scan (m/z350–1500) followed by 50 data-dependent product ion scans of the 50 most intense precursor ions. The MS data was analysed with the Markerview software package using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) or PCA-Discriminate Analysis (PCA-DA) which compares data across multiple samples, groupings the data sets, and graphically showing the groups in a Scores plot. The Loadings plot provides valuable insight into variables that lead to sample clustering and illustrates which biomarkers are up- or down-regulated. All mass spectra were analysed using the Mascot and Protein Pilot search engines against the Swissprot-swissprot database with the species set as human (scores greater than 30). False discovery rate (FDR) was estimated using a reversed sequence database. Finally, proteins identified were submitted to bioinformatic pathway analysis (Ingenuity Pathway Analysis [IPA]; Ingenuity Systems, Mountain View, CA; http://www.ingenuity.com).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM, with n = 10 different patients per group (i.e. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 weeks). The effect of gestational age on number of exosome particles and placental-derived exosomes were assessed by two-way ANOVA, with variance partitioned between gestational age and subject. Statistical difference between group means was assessed by Dunn’s test to compare each treatment to the control group where the data distribution approximates normality and by Mann–Whitney U-test for distribution independent data analysis. Two group means were statistically assessed by Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Exosome characterisation

Maternal plasma exosomes isolated by differential and sucrose density gradient centrifugation were characterised by a buoyant density of 1.122 to 1.197 g/ml (fractions 4 to 7) (Figure 1A-D). Nanoparticle tracking analysis showed a particle size distribution of 200,000 × g pellet (Figure 1A) ranging from 30 to 300 nm in diameter corresponding to microsomal fraction (including exosomes particles) with an average of 147 ± 71 nm (mean ± SD) (Figure 1B). After the sucrose continuous gradient, we mixed the enriched exosomal fractions (1.122 to 1.197 g/ml) (Figure 1C) and obtained a particle size distribution ranged from 50 to 140 nm in diameter, with an average of 98 ± 39 nm (mean ± SD) (Figure 1D). Electron microscopy revealed the presence of spherical vesicles, with a typical cup-shape and diameters ranging from 30 to 120 nm (Figure 1D, insert).
Figure 1

Characterisation of exosome from maternal circulation. Exosome were isolated from women uncomplicated pregnancies during first trimester by differential and buoyant density centrifugation (see Methods). (A) Flow chart for the exosome purification procedure based on differential ultracentrifugation. (B) Representative particles size distribution of microsomal fraction. (C) Flow chart for the exosome purification procedure based on sucrose continuous gradient (exosome enriched fractions in yellow 4–7). (D) Representative particles size distribution of enriched exosomal fractions (fraction 4–7 were mixed). Insert: Representative electron micrograph exosome fractions (pooled enriched exosome population from fractions 4 to 7), Scale bar 200 nm.

Characterisation of exosome from maternal circulation. Exosome were isolated from women uncomplicated pregnancies during first trimester by differential and buoyant density centrifugation (see Methods). (A) Flow chart for the exosome purification procedure based on differential ultracentrifugation. (B) Representative particles size distribution of microsomal fraction. (C) Flow chart for the exosome purification procedure based on sucrose continuous gradient (exosome enriched fractions in yellow 4–7). (D) Representative particles size distribution of enriched exosomal fractions (fraction 4–7 were mixed). Insert: Representative electron micrograph exosome fractions (pooled enriched exosome population from fractions 4 to 7), Scale bar 200 nm. The stability of exosomes after a freeze and thaw cycle was evaluated using fresh and frozen plasma. No significant difference was observed using fresh or frozen plasma in exosome quantification, exosomal marker expression, microRNA expression or protein content (Figure 2A-D, Table 1).
Figure 2

Characteristics of exosomes isolated from plasma immediately after phlebotomy (○) and after 30 days stored at −80°C (●). (A) Number of exosome particles. (B) Exosomes characterization. b1: electron microscope (scale bar 100 nm) and b2: Western blot for CD63 (exosomal marker); lane 1: Fresh and lane 2: stored. (C) Expression of miRNA RNU6B in exosomes. (D) Venn diagram of proteins identified in fresh and stored exosomes.

Table 1

Common proteins identified in exosomes isolated from fresh plasma and after freeze/thawing cycles

Protein IDSymbolEntrez gene nameLocationType(s)
A2MG_HUMANA2Malpha-2-macroglobulinExtracellular Spacetransporter
A2ML1_HUMANA2ML1alpha-2-macroglobulin-like 1Cytoplasmother
ACACA_HUMANACACAacetyl-CoA carboxylase alphaCytoplasmenzyme
ACTN3_HUMANACTN3actinin, alpha 3Plasma Membraneother
ADAL_HUMANADALadenosine deaminase-likeCytoplasmenzyme
ATS16_HUMANADAMTS16ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 16Extracellular Spaceother
ATS9_HUMANADAMTS9ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 9Extracellular Spacepeptidase
DSRAD_HUMANADARadenosine deaminase, RNA-specificNucleusenzyme
ADCY7_HUMANADCY7adenylate cyclase 7Plasma Membraneenzyme
KFA_HUMANAFMIDarylformamidaseNucleusenzyme
ANGT_HUMANAGTangiotensinogen (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 8)Extracellular Spacegrowth factor
ALBU_HUMANALBalbuminExtracellular Spacetransporter
AMZ1_HUMANAMZ1archaelysin family metallopeptidase 1Otherpeptidase
ANK2_HUMANANK2ankyrin 2, neuronalPlasma Membraneother
ANKAR_HUMANANKARankyrin and armadillo repeat containingNucleustranscription regulator
AKD1B_HUMANANKDD1Bankyrin repeat and death domain containing 1BOtherother
ANKL1_HUMANANKLE1ankyrin repeat and LEM domain containing 1Otherother
ANR12_HUMANANKRD12ankyrin repeat domain 12Nucleusother
ANR26_HUMANANKRD26ankyrin repeat domain 26Nucleustranscription regulator
ANKUB_HUMANANKUB1ankyrin repeat and ubiquitin domain containing 1Otherother
APOA1_HUMANAPOA1apolipoprotein A-IExtracellular Spacetransporter
APOB_HUMANAPOBapolipoprotein BExtracellular Spacetransporter
APOL1_HUMANAPOL1apolipoprotein L, 1Extracellular Spacetransporter
APOP1_HUMANAPOPT1apoptogenic 1, mitochondrialCytoplasmother
DP13B_HUMANAPPL2adaptor protein, phosphotyrosine interaction, PH domain and leucine zipper containing 2Cytoplasmother
RHG15_HUMANARHGAP15Rho GTPase activating protein 15Cytoplasmother
RHG08_HUMANARHGAP8/PRR5-ARHGAP8Rho GTPase activating protein 8Cytoplasmother
ARHGB_HUMANARHGEF11Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 11Cytoplasmother
ASPM_HUMANASPMasp (abnormal spindle) homolog, microcephaly associated (Drosophila)Nucleusother
ATG2B_HUMANATG2Bautophagy related 2BOtherother
AT2A3_HUMANATP2A3ATPase, Ca++ transporting, ubiquitousCytoplasmtransporter
RENR_HUMANATP6AP2ATPase, H + transporting, lysosomal accessory protein 2Cytoplasmtransporter
ATR_HUMANATRataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 relatedNucleuskinase
B4GT7_HUMANB4GALT7xylosylprotein beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 7Cytoplasmenzyme
BEND4_HUMANBEND4BEN domain containing 4Otherother
OSTCN_HUMANBGLAPbone gamma-carboxyglutamate (gla) proteinExtracellular Spaceother
BLM_HUMANBLMBloom syndrome, RecQ helicase-likeNucleusenzyme
BRCA2_HUMANBRCA2breast cancer 2, early onsetNucleustranscription regulator
BRPF1_HUMANBRPF1bromodomain and PHD finger containing, 1Nucleustransporter
CS068_HUMANC19orf68chromosome 19 open reading frame 68Otherother
CA174_HUMANC1orf174chromosome 1 open reading frame 174Nucleusother
CA228_HUMANC1orf228chromosome 1 open reading frame 228Otherother
C1QC_HUMANC1QCcomplement component 1, q subcomponent, C chainExtracellular Spaceother
CO3_HUMANC3complement component 3Extracellular Spacepeptidase
CO4A_HUMANC4A/C4Bcomplement component 4B (Chido blood group)Extracellular Spaceother
C4BPA_HUMANC4BPAcomplement component 4 binding protein, alphaExtracellular Spaceother
CI078_HUMANC9orf78chromosome 9 open reading frame 78Otherother
CAH3_HUMANCA3carbonic anhydrase III, muscle specificCytoplasmenzyme
CABIN_HUMANCABIN1calcineurin binding protein 1Nucleusother
CAND1_HUMANCAND1cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated 1Cytoplasmtranscription regulator
CAN1_HUMANCAPN1calpain 1, (mu/I) large subunitCytoplasmpeptidase
CAN2_HUMANCAPN2calpain 2, (m/II) large subunitCytoplasmpeptidase
CASC5_HUMANCASC5cancer susceptibility candidate 5Nucleusother
C8AP2_HUMANCASP8AP2caspase 8 associated protein 2Nucleustranscription regulator
CC154_HUMANCCDC154coiled-coil domain containing 154Otherother
CC171_HUMANCCDC171coiled-coil domain containing 171Otherother
CCD30_HUMANCCDC30coiled-coil domain containing 30Otherother
CCD37_HUMANCCDC37coiled-coil domain containing 37Otherother
CCD80_HUMANCCDC80coiled-coil domain containing 80Nucleusother
CCHCR_HUMANCCHCR1coiled-coil alpha-helical rod protein 1Cytoplasmother
CENPH_HUMANCENPHcentromere protein HNucleusother
CP135_HUMANCEP135centrosomal protein 135 kDaCytoplasmother
CFAH_HUMANCFHcomplement factor HExtracellular Spaceother
CHD4_HUMANCHD4chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 4Nucleusenzyme
CHD9_HUMANCHD9chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 9Cytoplasmother
ACHG_HUMANCHRNGcholinergic receptor, nicotinic, gamma (muscle)Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
CHSTB_HUMANCHST11carbohydrate (chondroitin 4) sulfotransferase 11Cytoplasmenzyme
CHSS3_HUMANCHSY3chondroitin sulfate synthase 3Cytoplasmenzyme
CILP1_HUMANCILPcartilage intermediate layer protein, nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolaseExtracellular Spacephosphatase
CLNK_HUMANCLNKcytokine-dependent hematopoietic cell linkerCytoplasmother
CLUS_HUMANCLUclusterinCytoplasmother
CMBL_HUMANCMBLcarboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog (Pseudomonas)Cytoplasmenzyme
CNO6L_HUMANCNOT6LCCR4-NOT transcription complex, subunit 6-likeCytoplasmenzyme
COPA1_HUMANCOL25A1collagen, type XXV, alpha 1Cytoplasmother
CROCC_HUMANCROCCciliary rootlet coiled-coil, rootletinPlasma Membraneother
CSRN1_HUMANCSRNP1cysteine-serine-rich nuclear protein 1Nucleustranscription regulator
DIAC_HUMANCTBSchitobiase, di-N-acetyl-Cytoplasmenzyme
CUL9_HUMANCUL9cullin 9Cytoplasmother
CWC25_HUMANCWC25CWC25 spliceosome-associated protein homolog (S. cerevisiae)Otherother
CP1A2_HUMANCYP1A2cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily A, polypeptide 2Cytoplasmenzyme
CP51A_HUMANCYP51A1cytochrome P450, family 51, subfamily A, polypeptide 1Cytoplasmenzyme
DAPL1_HUMANDAPL1death associated protein-like 1Otherother
DCAF6_HUMANDCAF6DDB1 and CUL4 associated factor 6Nucleustranscription regulator
DCR1B_HUMANDCLRE1BDNA cross-link repair 1BNucleusenzyme
DCSTP_HUMANDCSTAMPdendrocyte expressed seven transmembrane proteinPlasma Membraneother
DCX_HUMANDCXdoublecortinCytoplasmother
DDX51_HUMANDDX51DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 51Otherenzyme
DEN2D_HUMANDENND2DDENN/MADD domain containing 2DCytoplasmother
DESM_HUMANDESdesminCytoplasmother
DGAT1_HUMANDGAT1diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1Cytoplasmenzyme
DGC14_HUMANDGCR14DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 14Nucleusother
DHX30_HUMANDHX30DEAH (Asp-Glu-Ala-His) box helicase 30Nucleusenzyme
DIP2B_HUMANDIP2BDIP2 disco-interacting protein 2 homolog B (Drosophila)Cytoplasmother
DMXL1_HUMANDMXL1Dmx-like 1Extracellular Spaceother
DYH17_HUMANDNAH17dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 17Cytoplasmother
DYH2_HUMANDNAH2dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 2Otherother
DYH3_HUMANDNAH3dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 3Extracellular Spaceenzyme
DYH5_HUMANDNAH5dynein, axonemal, heavy chain 5Cytoplasmenzyme
DNJC7_HUMANDNAJC7DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily C, member 7Cytoplasmother
DOP1_HUMANDOPEY1dopey family member 1Cytoplasmother
DSCAM_HUMANDSCAMDown syndrome cell adhesion moleculePlasma Membraneother
DUS3L_HUMANDUS3Ldihydrouridine synthase 3-like (S. cerevisiae)Otherother
DYHC2_HUMANDYNC2H1dynein, cytoplasmic 2, heavy chain 1Cytoplasmother
COE2_HUMANEBF2early B-cell factor 2Nucleusother
EBP_HUMANEBPemopamil binding protein (sterol isomerase)Cytoplasmenzyme
EIF3C_HUMANEIF3Ceukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit COthertranslation regulator
ENPP1_HUMANENPP1ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1Plasma Membraneenzyme
ENPP5_HUMANENPP5ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 5 (putative)Extracellular Spaceenzyme
PERE_HUMANEPXeosinophil peroxidaseCytoplasmenzyme
EXOS1_HUMANEXOSC1exosome component 1Nucleusenzyme
F150A_HUMANFAM150Afamily with sequence similarity 150, member AOtherother
F196B_HUMANFAM196Bfamily with sequence similarity 196, member BOtherother
F208B_HUMANFAM208Bfamily with sequence similarity 208, member BOtherother
YV021_HUMANFAM230Bfamily with sequence similarity 230, member B (non-protein coding)Extracellular Spaceother
FA78B_HUMANFAM78Bfamily with sequence similarity 78, member BOtherother
FBF1_HUMANFBF1Fas (TNFRSF6) binding factor 1Nucleusother
FIBA_HUMANFGAfibrinogen alpha chainExtracellular Spaceother
FIBB_HUMANFGBfibrinogen beta chainExtracellular Spaceother
FR1OP_HUMANFGFR1OPFGFR1 oncogene partnerCytoplasmkinase
FGRL1_HUMANFGFRL1fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
FIBG_HUMANFGGfibrinogen gamma chainExtracellular Spaceother
FHAD1_HUMANFHAD1forkhead-associated (FHA) phosphopeptide binding domain 1Otherother
FIGL2_HUMANFIGNL2fidgetin-like 2Otherother
FLNB_HUMANFLNBfilamin B, betaCytoplasmother
FINC_HUMANFN1fibronectin 1Extracellular Spaceenzyme
FRMD3_HUMANFRMD3FERM domain containing 3Otherother
G6PC2_HUMANG6PC2glucose-6-phosphatase, catalytic, 2Cytoplasmphosphatase
GAK_HUMANGAKcyclin G associated kinaseNucleuskinase
GSH0_HUMANGCLMglutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunitCytoplasmenzyme
GCN1L_HUMANGCN1L1GCN1 general control of amino-acid synthesis 1-like 1 (yeast)Cytoplasmtranslation regulator
CXB1_HUMANGJB1gap junction protein, beta 1, 32 kDaPlasma Membranetransporter
GLRA2_HUMANGLRA2glycine receptor, alpha 2Plasma Membraneion channel
GMEB1_HUMANGMEB1glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein 1Nucleustranscription regulator
GOGA3_HUMANGOLGA3golgin A3Cytoplasmtransporter
AATC_HUMANGOT1glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1, solubleCytoplasmenzyme
GRID2_HUMANGRID2glutamate receptor, ionotropic, delta 2Plasma Membraneion channel
GSAP_HUMANGSAPgamma-secretase activating proteinCytoplasmpeptidase
GSAS1_HUMANGSN-AS1GSN antisense RNA 1Otherother
GSHB_HUMANGSSglutathione synthetaseCytoplasmenzyme
HERC1_HUMANHERC1HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 1Cytoplasmother
HES1_HUMANHES1hes family bHLH transcription factor 1Nucleustranscription regulator
HILS1_HUMANHILS1histone linker H1 domain, spermatid-specific 1, pseudogeneNucleusother
HIP1_HUMANHIP1huntingtin interacting protein 1Cytoplasmother
HJURP_HUMANHJURPHolliday junction recognition proteinNucleusother
HPTR_HUMANHPRhaptoglobin-related proteinExtracellular Spacepeptidase
5HT2A_HUMANHTR2A5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2A, G protein-coupledPlasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptor
I23O2_HUMANIDO2indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2Cytoplasmenzyme
GILT_HUMANIFI30interferon, gamma-inducible protein 30Cytoplasmenzyme
IGHA1_HUMANIGHA1immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1Extracellular Spaceother
IGHG1_HUMANIGHG1immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 1 (G1m marker)Extracellular Spaceother
IGHM_HUMANIGHMimmunoglobulin heavy constant muPlasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
IGJ_HUMANIGJimmunoglobulin J polypeptide, linker protein for immunoglobulin alpha and mu polypeptidesExtracellular Spaceother
IGKC_HUMANIGKCimmunoglobulin kappa constantExtracellular Spaceother
KV401_HUMANIGKV4-1immunoglobulin kappa variable 4-1Extracellular Spaceother
LAC1_HUMANIGLC1immunoglobulin lambda constant 1 (Mcg marker)Cytoplasmother
LAC2_HUMANIGLC2immunoglobulin lambda constant 2 (Kern-Oz- marker)Extracellular Spaceother
IHH_HUMANIHHindian hedgehogExtracellular Spaceenzyme
RED_HUMANIKIK cytokine, down-regulator of HLA IIExtracellular Spacecytokine
IL1AP_HUMANIL1RAPinterleukin 1 receptor accessory proteinPlasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
IRPL2_HUMANIL1RAPL2interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein-like 2Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
IL26_HUMANIL26interleukin 26Extracellular Spacecytokine
INCE_HUMANINCENPinner centromere protein antigens 135/155 kDaNucleusother
IQCF6_HUMANIQCF6IQ motif containing F6Otherother
JARD2_HUMANJARID2jumonji, AT rich interactive domain 2Nucleustranscription regulator
KTNB1_HUMANKATNB1katanin p80 (WD repeat containing) subunit B 1Cytoplasmenzyme
KCND2_HUMANKCND2potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related subfamily, member 2Plasma Membraneion channel
KCNQ5_HUMANKCNQ5potassium voltage-gated channel, KQT-like subfamily, member 5Plasma Membraneion channel
KDM2B_HUMANKDM2Blysine (K)-specific demethylase 2BNucleusother
KDM5A_HUMANKDM5Alysine (K)-specific demethylase 5ANucleustranscription regulator
TALD3_HUMANKIAA0586KIAA0586Cytoplasmother
K1161_HUMANKIAA1161KIAA1161Nucleusother
KI13A_HUMANKIF13Akinesin family member 13ACytoplasmtransporter
KIF19_HUMANKIF19kinesin family member 19Extracellular Spaceenzyme
KIRR1_HUMANKIRRELkin of IRRE like (Drosophila)Plasma Membraneother
KLC2_HUMANKLC2kinesin light chain 2Cytoplasmother
KLRF1_HUMANKLRF1killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily F, member 1Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
LDB1_HUMANLDB1LIM domain binding 1Nucleustranscription regulator
LHPL3_HUMANLHFPL3lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 3Otherother
LIPC_HUMANLIPClipase, hepaticExtracellular Spaceenzyme
YP023_HUMANLOC100128265uncharacterized LOC100128265Otherother
LRP1B_HUMANLRP1Blow density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1BPlasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
LTBP2_HUMANLTBP2latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 2Extracellular Spaceother
LY75_HUMANLY75lymphocyte antigen 75Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
MACD1_HUMANMACROD1MACRO domain containing 1Cytoplasmenzyme
MANF_HUMANMANFmesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factorExtracellular Spaceother
MLP3A_HUMANMAP1LC3Amicrotubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 alphaCytoplasmother
MAP4_HUMANMAP4microtubule-associated protein 4Cytoplasmother
MA7D3_HUMANMAP7D3MAP7 domain containing 3Cytoplasmother
MBD5_HUMANMBD5methyl-CpG binding domain protein 5Nucleusother
MDN1_HUMANMDN1MDN1, midasin homolog (yeast)Nucleusother
MEX3B_HUMANMEX3Bmex-3 RNA binding family member BOtherkinase
MFNG_HUMANMFNGMFNG O-fucosylpeptide 3-beta-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferaseCytoplasmenzyme
MKL1_HUMANMKL1megakaryoblastic leukemia (translocation) 1Nucleustranscription regulator
MRE11_HUMANMRE11AMRE11 meiotic recombination 11 homolog A (S. cerevisiae)Nucleusenzyme
RM32_HUMANMRPL32mitochondrial ribosomal protein L32Cytoplasmtranslation regulator
MYBA_HUMANMYBL1v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog-like 1Nucleustranscription regulator
MYO15_HUMANMYO15Amyosin XVACytoplasmother
MYO3A_HUMANMYO3Amyosin IIIACytoplasmkinase
MYO6_HUMANMYO6myosin VICytoplasmother
ULA1_HUMANNAE1NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 subunit 1Cytoplasmenzyme
NUCL_HUMANNCLnucleolinNucleusother
NCOA2_HUMANNCOA2nuclear receptor coactivator 2Nucleustranscription regulator
NEBU_HUMANNEBnebulinCytoplasmother
NEDD4_HUMANNEDD4neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4, E3 ubiquitin protein ligaseCytoplasmenzyme
NHS_HUMANNHSNance-Horan syndrome (congenital cataracts and dental anomalies)Nucleusother
NOA1_HUMANNOA1nitric oxide associated 1Cytoplasmother
NRX3A_HUMANNRXN3neurexin 3Othertransporter
NSD1_HUMANNSD1nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1Nucleustranscription regulator
NSN5C_HUMANNSUN5P2NOP2/Sun domain family, member 5 pseudogene 2Otherother
NET5_HUMANNTN5netrin 5Otherother
NUD15_HUMANNUDT15nudix (nucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X)-type motif 15Cytoplasmphosphatase
OBSCN_HUMANOBSCNobscurin, cytoskeletal calmodulin and titin-interacting RhoGEFCytoplasmkinase
OCEL1_HUMANOCEL1occludin/ELL domain containing 1Otherother
ODFP2_HUMANODF2outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2Cytoplasmother
NOE2_HUMANOLFM2olfactomedin 2Cytoplasmother
OPN4_HUMANOPN4opsin 4Plasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptor
OR4K1_HUMANOR4K1olfactory receptor, family 4, subfamily K, member 1Plasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptor
PALB2_HUMANPALB2partner and localizer of BRCA2Nucleusother
PAR3L_HUMANPARD3Bpar-3 family cell polarity regulator betaPlasma Membraneother
PARP4_HUMANPARP4poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family, member 4Cytoplasmenzyme
PCDH8_HUMANPCDH8protocadherin 8Plasma Membraneother
PCLO_HUMANPCLOpiccolo presynaptic cytomatrix proteinCytoplasmtransporter
PEAK1_HUMANPEAK1pseudopodium-enriched atypical kinase 1Plasma Membranekinase
PEG10_HUMANPEG10paternally expressed 10Nucleusother
PER3_HUMANPER3period circadian clock 3Nucleusother
PFD6_HUMANPFDN6prefoldin subunit 6Cytoplasmother
PIGS_HUMANPIGSphosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis, class SCytoplasmenzyme
P3C2A_HUMANPIK3C2Aphosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit type 2 alphaCytoplasmkinase
SOX_HUMANPIPOXpipecolic acid oxidaseCytoplasmenzyme
PLCD3_HUMANPLCD3phospholipase C, delta 3Cytoplasmenzyme
PLXA4_HUMANPLXNA4plexin A4Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
PNKD_HUMANPNKDparoxysmal nonkinesigenic dyskinesiaNucleusother
PNKP_HUMANPNKPpolynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphataseNucleuskinase
DPOLQ_HUMANPOLQpolymerase (DNA directed), thetaNucleusenzyme
PMGT1_HUMANPOMGNT1protein O-linked mannose N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 1 (beta 1,2-)Cytoplasmenzyme
PPIG_HUMANPPIGpeptidylprolyl isomerase G (cyclophilin G)Nucleusenzyme
PP12C_HUMANPPP1R12Cprotein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 12CCytoplasmphosphatase
PPT2_HUMANPPT2palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 2Cytoplasmenzyme
PREB_HUMANPREBprolactin regulatory element bindingNucleustranscription regulator
PPCEL_HUMANPREPLprolyl endopeptidase-likeOtherpeptidase
PRG4_HUMANPRG4proteoglycan 4Extracellular Spaceother
PRP31_HUMANPRPF31pre-mRNA processing factor 31Nucleusother
PRC2A_HUMANPRRC2Aproline-rich coiled-coil 2ACytoplasmother
PSB3_HUMANPSMB3proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type, 3Cytoplasmpeptidase
PRS7_HUMANPSMC2proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, ATPase, 2Nucleuspeptidase
PTPRM_HUMANPTPRMprotein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, MPlasma Membranephosphatase
PTTG3_HUMANPTTG3Ppituitary tumor-transforming 3, pseudogeneOtherother
PZP_HUMANPZPpregnancy-zone proteinExtracellular Spaceother
RAB10_HUMANRAB10RAB10, member RAS oncogene familyCytoplasmenzyme
RB3GP_HUMANRAB3GAP1RAB3 GTPase activating protein subunit 1 (catalytic)Cytoplasmother
RAB6A_HUMANRAB6ARAB6A, member RAS oncogene familyCytoplasmenzyme
RAB8B_HUMANRAB8BRAB8B, member RAS oncogene familyCytoplasmenzyme
RGPA2_HUMANRALGAPA2Ral GTPase activating protein, alpha subunit 2 (catalytic)Cytoplasmother
RBM23_HUMANRBM23RNA binding motif protein 23Nucleusother
REG1A_HUMANREG1Aregenerating islet-derived 1 alphaExtracellular Spacegrowth factor
RELN_HUMANRELNreelinExtracellular Spacepeptidase
RFC4_HUMANRFC4replication factor C (activator 1) 4, 37 kDaNucleusother
RFX8_HUMANRFX8RFX family member 8, lacking RFX DNA binding domainOtherother
RMND1_HUMANRMND1required for meiotic nuclear division 1 homolog (S. cerevisiae)Cytoplasmother
RNF17_HUMANRNF17ring finger protein 17Cytoplasmother
RN213_HUMANRNF213ring finger protein 213Cytoplasmenzyme
RN219_HUMANRNF219ring finger protein 219Otherother
FTM_HUMANRPGRIP1LRPGRIP1-likeCytoplasmother
RL29_HUMANRPL29ribosomal protein L29Cytoplasmother
RL37_HUMANRPL37ribosomal protein L37Cytoplasmother
KS6A4_HUMANRPS6KA4ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90 kDa, polypeptide 4Cytoplasmkinase
RTKN_HUMANRTKNrhotekinCytoplasmother
RYR2_HUMANRYR2ryanodine receptor 2 (cardiac)Plasma Membraneion channel
SAMD8_HUMANSAMD8sterile alpha motif domain containing 8Cytoplasmother
SASH1_HUMANSASH1SAM and SH3 domain containing 1Extracellular Spaceother
UTER_HUMANSCGB1A1secretoglobin, family 1A, member 1 (uteroglobin)Extracellular Spacecytokine
SCUB3_HUMANSCUBE3signal peptide, CUB domain, EGF-like 3Plasma Membraneother
SPB9_HUMANSERPINB9serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 9Cytoplasmother
SET1A_HUMANSETD1ASET domain containing 1ANucleusion channel
SHAN1_HUMANSHANK1SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 1Cytoplasmother
SHAN3_HUMANSHANK3SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 3Plasma Membraneother
CTL1_HUMANSLC44A1solute carrier family 44 (choline transporter), member 1Plasma Membranetransporter
SNTAN_HUMANSNTNsentan, cilia apical structure proteinOtherother
SOLH1_HUMANSOHLH1spermatogenesis and oogenesis specific basic helix-loop-helix 1Cytoplasmtranscription regulator
SPAG7_HUMANSPAG7sperm associated antigen 7Nucleusother
SPA2L_HUMANSPATA2Lspermatogenesis associated 2-likeOtherother
CYTSB_HUMANSPECC1sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1Nucleusother
SPO11_HUMANSPO11SPO11 meiotic protein covalently bound to DSBNucleusenzyme
SPTN5_HUMANSPTBN5spectrin, beta, non-erythrocytic 5Plasma Membraneother
SRGP2_HUMANSRGAP2SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2Cytoplasmother
SRG2C_HUMANSRGAP2CSLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2COtherother
SIA7B_HUMANST6GALNAC2ST6 (alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1,3)-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 2Cytoplasmenzyme
STXB1_HUMANSTXBP1syntaxin binding protein 1Cytoplasmtransporter
SP20H_HUMANSUPT20Hsuppressor of Ty 20 homolog (S. cerevisiae)Nucleusother
SPT6H_HUMANSUPT6Hsuppressor of Ty 6 homolog (S. cerevisiae)Nucleustranscription regulator
SVEP1_HUMANSVEP1sushi, von Willebrand factor type A, EGF and pentraxin domain containing 1Cytoplasmother
SYNJ1_HUMANSYNJ1synaptojanin 1Cytoplasmphosphatase
TADA3_HUMANTADA3transcriptional adaptor 3Nucleustranscription regulator
TBX20_HUMANTBX20T-box 20Nucleustranscription regulator
TDRD1_HUMANTDRD1tudor domain containing 1Cytoplasmother
TET1_HUMANTET1tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 1Nucleusother
THMS1_HUMANTHEMISthymocyte selection associatedCytoplasmother
TLK2_HUMANTLK2tousled-like kinase 2Cytoplasmkinase
TM131_HUMANTMEM131transmembrane protein 131Extracellular Spaceother
T132C_HUMANTMEM132Ctransmembrane protein 132COtherother
T151A_HUMANTMEM151Atransmembrane protein 151AOtherother
TM232_HUMANTMEM232transmembrane protein 232Otherother
TNFA_HUMANTNFtumor necrosis factorExtracellular Spacecytokine
TPD54_HUMANTPD52L2tumor protein D52-like 2Cytoplasmother
TRML4_HUMANTREML4triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-like 4Otherother
TRI32_HUMANTRIM32tripartite motif containing 32Nucleustranscription regulator
TRI65_HUMANTRIM65tripartite motif containing 65Otherother
TARA_HUMANTRIOBPTRIO and F-actin binding proteinNucleusother
TRIPB_HUMANTRIP11thyroid hormone receptor interactor 11Cytoplasmtranscription regulator
TROAP_HUMANTROAPtrophinin associated proteinCytoplasmpeptidase
TRPC5_HUMANTRPC5transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 5Plasma Membraneion channel
TSG13_HUMANTSGA13testis specific, 13Otherother
TTC12_HUMANTTC12tetratricopeptide repeat domain 12Otherother
TITIN_HUMANTTNtitinCytoplasmkinase
GCP6_HUMANTUBGCP6tubulin, gamma complex associated protein 6Cytoplasmother
TRXR3_HUMANTXNRD3thioredoxin reductase 3Cytoplasmenzyme
UBQLN_HUMANUBQLNLubiquilin-likeOtherother
UCKL1_HUMANUCKL1uridine-cytidine kinase 1-like 1Cytoplasmkinase
UGDH_HUMANUGDHUDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenaseNucleusenzyme
USP9X_HUMANUSP9Xubiquitin specific peptidase 9, X-linkedPlasma Membranepeptidase
UTRO_HUMANUTRNutrophinPlasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
VP13C_HUMANVPS13Cvacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog C (S. cerevisiae)Cytoplasmother
WAC_HUMANWACWW domain containing adaptor with coiled-coilNucleusother
WDR1_HUMANWDR1WD repeat domain 1Extracellular Spaceother
WDR35_HUMANWDR35WD repeat domain 35Cytoplasmother
WDR43_HUMANWDR43WD repeat domain 43Nucleusother
WFDC3_HUMANWFDC3WAP four-disulfide core domain 3Extracellular Spaceother
YIPF1_HUMANYIPF1Yip1 domain family, member 1Cytoplasmother
NIPA_HUMANZC3HC1zinc finger, C3HC-type containing 1Nucleusother
ZFHX4_HUMANZFHX4zinc finger homeobox 4Extracellular Spaceother
ZF64B_HUMANZFP64ZFP64 zinc finger proteinNucleusother
ZN132_HUMANZNF132zinc finger protein 132Nucleusother
ZNF14_HUMANZNF14zinc finger protein 14Nucleustranscription regulator
ZN215_HUMANZNF215zinc finger protein 215Nucleustranscription regulator
Z286B_HUMANZNF286Bzinc finger protein 286BOtherother
ZN345_HUMANZNF345zinc finger protein 345Nucleustranscription regulator
ZN532_HUMANZNF532zinc finger protein 532Otherother
ZN561_HUMANZNF561zinc finger protein 561Nucleusother
ZN624_HUMANZNF624zinc finger protein 624Nucleusother
ZNF74_HUMANZNF74zinc finger protein 74Nucleusother

List of common exosomal proteins are presented as Protein ID, Symbol, Entrez Gene Name, Location and type. No significant differences were observed en exosomal protein content from fresh or frozen plasma (coefficient of variation < 5%) after different freeze thawing cycle from the same sample.

Characteristics of exosomes isolated from plasma immediately after phlebotomy (○) and after 30 days stored at −80°C (●). (A) Number of exosome particles. (B) Exosomes characterization. b1: electron microscope (scale bar 100 nm) and b2: Western blot for CD63 (exosomal marker); lane 1: Fresh and lane 2: stored. (C) Expression of miRNA RNU6B in exosomes. (D) Venn diagram of proteins identified in fresh and stored exosomes. Common proteins identified in exosomes isolated from fresh plasma and after freeze/thawing cycles List of common exosomal proteins are presented as Protein ID, Symbol, Entrez Gene Name, Location and type. No significant differences were observed en exosomal protein content from fresh or frozen plasma (coefficient of variation < 5%) after different freeze thawing cycle from the same sample.

Placenta-derived exosome increased during first trimester in normal pregnancy

Pooled exosome-containing fractions (i.e. fractions 4 to 7) were further characterised by determining the number of exosome (NEP) and exosomal PLAP concentration in the serial samples of maternal plasma obtained during first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. 6–12 weeks). The gestational age variation in plasma exosome number was analysed by two-way ANOVA with the variance partitioned between gestational age and subject. A significantly effect of gestational age was identified (n = 69, one missing value, p < 0.005). A post-hoc multiple range test was used to identify statistically significant (p <0.05) differences between pairwise comparisons (Figure 3A). In addition, a significant effect of subject was identified (n = 69, one missing value, p < 0.05) (Figure 3B). In addition, NEP and gestational age (i.e. 6–12 weeks) displayed a significant positive linear relationship (r2 = 0.202, p < 0.001, n = 69, one missing value).
Figure 3

Exosome profiling across first trimester pregnancy. Enriched exosomal population (i.e. number of exosome particles) and placenta-derived exosomes (i.e. exosomal PLAP) were quantified in in peripheral plasma of women in the first trimester of pregnancy by ELISA. (A) exosomes as particles per ml plasma. (B) individual variation in exosome number for each week (C) exosomal PLAP during first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. 6–12 weeks). (D) individual variation in exosomal PLAP for each week. Data are presented as aligned dot plot and values are mean ± SEM. In A, two-way ANOVA **p = 0.0048, Dunn’s post-hoc test analysis = *p < 0.05 6 vs. 7 weeks and † p < 0.005: 6 vs. 12 weeks. In C, two-way ANOVA ***p < 0.0001, Dunn’s post-hoc test analysis = *p < 0.05 6 vs. 9 and 10 weeks, † p < 0.005: 6 vs. 11 and 12 weeks, and ‡ p < 0.005: 8 vs. 11 and 12 weeks.

Exosome profiling across first trimester pregnancy. Enriched exosomal population (i.e. number of exosome particles) and placenta-derived exosomes (i.e. exosomal PLAP) were quantified in in peripheral plasma of women in the first trimester of pregnancy by ELISA. (A) exosomes as particles per ml plasma. (B) individual variation in exosome number for each week (C) exosomal PLAP during first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. 6–12 weeks). (D) individual variation in exosomal PLAP for each week. Data are presented as aligned dot plot and values are mean ± SEM. In A, two-way ANOVA **p = 0.0048, Dunn’s post-hoc test analysis = *p < 0.05 6 vs. 7 weeks and † p < 0.005: 6 vs. 12 weeks. In C, two-way ANOVA ***p < 0.0001, Dunn’s post-hoc test analysis = *p < 0.05 6 vs. 9 and 10 weeks, † p < 0.005: 6 vs. 11 and 12 weeks, and ‡ p < 0.005: 8 vs. 11 and 12 weeks. To assess gestational variation in placenta-derived exosomes, exosomal immunoreative (IR) PLAP was quantified using a commercial ELISA kit (see Methods). IR exosomal PLAP concentrations were analysed by two-way ANOVA with the variance partitioned between gestational age and subject. A significant effect of gestational age was identified (p < 0.0001, n = 69, one missing value) (Figure 3C). A post-hoc multiple range test was used to identify statistically significant (p <0.05) differences between pairwise comparisons (Figure 3D). No significant effect of patient on exosomal PLAP concentration was identified (p = 0.123). Immunoreactive exosomal PLAP concentration and gestational age displayed a significant positive linear linear relationship (r2 = 0.711, p < 0.001, n = 69, one missing value).

Specific placental-derived exosomes

Exosomal PLAP concentration and exosome number were subjected to linear regression analysis. The fitted linear model was described by the following equation: plasma exosomal PLAP pg/ml = 85.6 + 5.47 × 10−11 × exosome number/ml (p < 0.006, n = 69, one missing pair). The coefficient of determination (r2) was 10.8 (Figure 4A).
Figure 4

Contribution of placental-derived exosomes into maternal circulation. (A) Relationship between exosomal PLAP and exosomes (particles per ml plasma) across first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. 6–12 weeks represented by colours). (B) Ratio of specific placental exosome and exosomes. In A, values are mean ± SEM, Linear correlation (−). In B, Data are presented as aligned dot plot and values are mean ± SEM, two-way ANOVA p > 0.05.

Contribution of placental-derived exosomes into maternal circulation. (A) Relationship between exosomal PLAP and exosomes (particles per ml plasma) across first trimester of pregnancy (i.e. 6–12 weeks represented by colours). (B) Ratio of specific placental exosome and exosomes. In A, values are mean ± SEM, Linear correlation (−). In B, Data are presented as aligned dot plot and values are mean ± SEM, two-way ANOVA p > 0.05. To estimate changes in the relative contribution of placental exosomes within the total exosomes present in maternal plasma and identify changes over the gestational age, the apparent PLAP content per 109 exosome (PLAP ratio) was determined. Overall PLAP ratio averaged 2.01 ± 0.33 × 10−9 exosomal PLAP (pg) per exosome. The effects of gestational age on PLAP ratio were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. No significant effect of gestational age on PLAP ratio was identified (p = 0.06) (Figure 4B).

Discussion

Currently, there are no proven means of identifying presymptomatic women who subsequently develop complications of pregnancy during early pregnancy. Most women who are triaged into high-risk clinical units based on previous poor obstetric history ultimately have uncomplicated pregnancies. Available evidence supports the hypothesis that the aetiology of pregnancy complications begins during 1st trimester [15, 16]. If this is the case, profile of placenta-derived biomarkers during early pregnancy may be common between women with risk of developing pregnancy complications. Identification of such characteristics would provide opportunity to develop clinically useful early pregnancy screening tests. Previously we have established that normal pregnancy is associated with the increase of exosomes into maternal plasma and the concentration of placenta-derived exosomes increases by 6-fold in uncomplicated healthy pregnancy during the first to third trimester [7] , however, the exosome profile in early pregnancy (i.e. from 6 to 12 weeks) remained to be established. The aim of this study was to characterise placenta-derived exosomes in maternal plasma over the first trimester of pregnancy and observe inter-subject variations in the exosome concentration. Weekly collected blood samples (from 6 to 12 weeks) were collected from normal healthy women to isolate and characterise the exosomes. The presence of exosomes were confirmed by: size (50–120 nM), and buoyant density (1.122- 1.197 g/ml). Endosomal (CD63) and placental (PLAP) antigens were identified in maternal plasma from as early as sixth week of pregnancy. The number of exosomes present in the maternal plasma increased progressively during the first trimester, as well as the exosomal PLAP concentration. We isolated exosomes from the maternal plasma by differential and buoyant density centrifugation using a sucrose continuous gradient [7, 17]. The purification of exosomes from plasma and other biological fluids is not trivial, however, the use of an automatic system for fraction collection after the sucrose continuous gradient enable a high-reproducibility density, and decreasing the coefficient of variation between samples. In addition, using purification method based on the density of exosomes discards vesicles with the same size of exosomes with no endosomal origin, increasing the purity of exosome samples. Previous studies have established that extracellular vesicles, including exosomes are released under physiological and pathophysiological conditions as well as during gestation [18]. The release of these vesicles is increased during pregnancy in response to different pathological conditions, presumably due to exosomal secretion from the placental trophoblast cells to the maternal peripheral circulation [19, 20] . In this study, we have established that exosomes are very stable when stored at −80°C. We obtained similar exosome yield from fresh and stored samples (i.e. plasma) and were able to identify gestational age differences in plasma exosome number in samples stored in long term. The isolation of exosomes from stored biofluids is the normal rather than the exception. These results are consistent with those of other studies [21, 22] suggesting that the exosomal content is protected inside these vesicles, highlighting the potential use of exosomes as biomarker for their high stability under different conditions. As exosomes carry different kinds of protein, mRNA and miRNA [23], engaging in cell-to-cell communication, it is likely that they play an important role in modifying the maternal physiological state to maintain a successful pregnancy [24]. Interestingly, in this study we found that placental-derived exosomes increased systematically during the first trimester as early as sixth week of pregnancy when the intervillous circulation is not fully established. However, it has been observed that communication between placental and fetal circulation occurs at the beginning of the fourth week post conception [25]. Moreover, the lacunar spaces are formed in the trophoblast from as early as nine days post-ovulation and maternal blood flows into the trophoblast lacunae between ten and eleven days after fecundation. In addition, it has been reported that the intervillous blood flow is present in an early stage (i.e. < seventh week) [26] and increases gradually from fourth week during the first trimester of pregnancy [27]. Trophoblast plugs occlude the spiral arteries to prevent the contact of maternal blood flow into the intervillous space, however, at the same time trophoblast plug are in contact with the maternal blood, and could releases soluble proteins (e.g. human chorionic gonadotropin, hCG) and vesicles (e.g. nanovesicles) into maternal circulation. Interesting to highlight that hCG can be measured in maternal plasma as early as 4 weeks of gestation, confirming the presence of molecules released from the trophoblast in early pregnancy. Moreover, β-hCG and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) have been measured in maternal plasma as early as 6 weeks of gestation [28]. Specific placental-derived exosomes were quantified in the maternal circulation using the immunoreactive placental protein PLAP. Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of exosomes-PLAP+ive only in peripheral circulation of pregnant women [7, 29]. PLAP is an integral membrane protein (enzyme) unique to the placenta (it has also been observed in some gynaecologic cancers), produced mainly by syncytiotrophoblast [30, 31]. Nevertheless, PLAP expression has been found in primary trophoblast cytotrophoblast cells [7] and ED27 trophoblast-like cells, both isolated from first trimester chorionic villi, and also in JEG-3 cells (a extravillous trophoblast model) [32]. In addition, using immunohistochemistry stain for PLAP, the majority of chorionic trophoblastic cells were positive for PLAP [33]. During the first trimester of pregnancy, the release of placental exosomes into the maternal blood may result from extravillous trophoblast and/or syncytiotrophoblast cells; however, while a definitive answer awaits further investigation, it is of relevance to note that fetal cells are present in maternal blood from 4 weeks of pregnancy and that trophoblast cells invade the decidua and myometrium from the time of implantation. Thus, a cellular and exosomal pathway exists for delivery into the maternal circulation. Recently, several attempts and techniques were undertaken to determine and characterize the exosomal content in different biological fluids including normal human blood plasma [34-36]. As, the content of these released exosomes are placenta- specific [37], studying these nanovesicles is excellent method to understand the different processes occurring during embryo/fetal development and the feto-maternal interaction. Exosome analysis provides diagnostic and therapeutic potential, and biomarker opportunities for the early detection of diseases [38-40]. To date, several research studies have been performed to identify the morphologic and proteomic characteristics of exosomes released from the placental extravilous trophoblast cells and expression profile of these exosomal contents relates to common pregnancy conditions [8, 41, 42]. However, all these studies considered the late second or third trimester of pregnancy plasma samples for analysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study present longitudinal data on placental-derived exosomes in the first trimester of pregnancy, starting from as early as 6 weeks after implantation. Early detection of women at risk of complications of pregnancy would provide opportunity to evaluate appropriate intervention strategies to limit acute adverse squeal. The rationale for developing early pregnancy screening tests is not only for the management of the contemporaneous pregnancy but also to optimise lifelong and intergenerational health. If this can be achieved, it will provide an opportunity for early assignment of risk and the implementation of an alternative clinical management strategy to improve outcome for both the mother and baby.
  40 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids.

Authors:  Clotilde Théry; Sebastian Amigorena; Graça Raposo; Aled Clayton
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04

Review 2.  Exosomes: proteomic insights and diagnostic potential.

Authors:  Richard J Simpson; Justin We Lim; Robert L Moritz; Suresh Mathivanan
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Intervillous and uteroplacental circulation in normal early pregnancy and early pregnancy loss assessed by 3-dimensional power Doppler angiography.

Authors:  Luis T Mercé; María J Barco; Juan L Alcázar; Rosa Sabatel; Juan Troyano
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Current topic: in vivo investigation of the placental circulations by Doppler echography.

Authors:  E Jauniaux; D Jurkovic; S Campbell
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  The endogenous retroviral envelope protein syncytin-1 inhibits LPS/PHA-stimulated cytokine responses in human blood and is sorted into placental exosomes.

Authors:  J M Tolosa; J E Schjenken; V L Clifton; A Vargas; B Barbeau; P Lowry; K Maiti; R Smith
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  ED(27) trophoblast-like cells isolated from first-trimester chorionic villi are genetically identical to HeLa cells yet exhibit a distinct phenotype.

Authors:  D A Kniss; Y Xie; Y Li; S Kumar; E A Linton; P Cohen; P Fan-Havard; C W G Redman; I L Sargent
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Exosomes and cardiac repair after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Susmita Sahoo; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  T lymphocytes are targets for platelet- and trophoblast-derived microvesicles during pregnancy.

Authors:  E Pap; E Pállinger; A Falus; A A Kiss; A Kittel; P Kovács; E I Buzás
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Cell-free fetal DNA levels in maternal plasma after elective first-trimester termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  Tuangsit Wataganara; Angela Y Chen; Erik S LeShane; Lisa M Sullivan; Lynn Borgatta; Diana W Bianchi; Kirby L Johnson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  A gestational profile of placental exosomes in maternal plasma and their effects on endothelial cell migration.

Authors:  Carlos Salomon; Maria Jose Torres; Miharu Kobayashi; Katherin Scholz-Romero; Luis Sobrevia; Aneta Dobierzewska; Sebastian E Illanes; Murray D Mitchell; Gregory E Rice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  127 in total

1.  Separating extracellular vesicles and lipoproteins via acoustofluidics.

Authors:  Mengxi Wu; Chuyi Chen; Zeyu Wang; Hunter Bachman; Yingshi Ouyang; Po-Hsun Huang; Yoel Sadovsky; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Unique microRNA Signals in Plasma Exosomes from Pregnancies Complicated by Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Hui Li; Yingshi Ouyang; Elena Sadovsky; W Tony Parks; Tianjiao Chu; Yoel Sadovsky
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Preservation and Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Anjana Jeyaram; Steven M Jay
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Quantitative Proteomics by SWATH-MS of Maternal Plasma Exosomes Determine Pathways Associated With Term and Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Ramkumar Menon; Christopher Luke Dixon; Samantha Sheller-Miller; Stephen J Fortunato; George R Saade; Carlos Palma; Andrew Lai; Dominic Guanzon; Carlos Salomon
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 5.  Placental small extracellular vesicles: Current questions and investigative opportunities.

Authors:  Yoel Sadovsky; Yingshi Ouyang; Juliana S Powell; Hui Li; Jean-Francois Mouillet; Adrian E Morelli; Alexander Sorkin; Leonid Margolis
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 6.  Extracellular vesicles and their immunomodulatory functions in pregnancy.

Authors:  Soumyalekshmi Nair; Carlos Salomon
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.623

7.  Extracellular vesicles generated by placental tissues ex vivo: A transport system for immune mediators and growth factors.

Authors:  Wendy Fitzgerald; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Offer Erez; Roberto Romero; Leonid Margolis
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  NF-κB-responsive miRNA-31-5p elicits endothelial dysfunction associated with preeclampsia via down-regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase.

Authors:  Suji Kim; Kyu-Sun Lee; Seunghwan Choi; Joohwan Kim; Dong-Keon Lee; Minsik Park; Wonjin Park; Tae-Hoon Kim; Jong Yun Hwang; Moo-Ho Won; Hansoo Lee; Sungwoo Ryoo; Kwon-Soo Ha; Young-Guen Kwon; Young-Myeong Kim
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Damage-Associated molecular pattern markers HMGB1 and cell-Free fetal telomere fragments in oxidative-Stressed amnion epithelial cell-Derived exosomes.

Authors:  Samantha Sheller-Miller; Rheanna Urrabaz-Garza; George Saade; Ramkumar Menon
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.054

10.  Placental origins of adverse pregnancy outcomes: potential molecular targets: an Executive Workshop Summary of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Authors:  John V Ilekis; Ekaterini Tsilou; Susan Fisher; Vikki M Abrahams; Michael J Soares; James C Cross; Stacy Zamudio; Nicholas P Illsley; Leslie Myatt; Christine Colvis; Maged M Costantine; David M Haas; Yoel Sadovsky; Carl Weiner; Erik Rytting; Gene Bidwell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.