Literature DB >> 17290366

Fetal growth and congenital malformations.

A Nikkilä1, B Källén, K Marsál.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether the risk for congenital malformations is increased in pregnancies with deviating fetal growth, i.e. in those in which the estimated date of delivery (EDD) was postponed more than 1 week at the second-trimester ultrasound fetometry scan, or those suspected of intrauterine growth restriction at routine ultrasound fetometry in the third trimester.
METHODS: The study period was 1994-2003. We used the Swedish Medical Birth Register to identify pregnancies with appropriate data (n = 605 845). A regional ultrasound database consisting of 73 092 pregnancies was used for more detailed data and analysis of the third-trimester fetal growth. The number of congenital malformations was ascertained from three national health registers.
RESULTS: We found a moderately increased risk for any malformation in the group of fetuses in which the EDD was postponed > 1 week. The strongest effect was seen for chromosome anomalies and central nervous system malformations, including neural tube defects. In the third trimester, an increased risk for fetal malformations was found in asymmetrically vs. symmetrically growth-restricted fetuses, perhaps more strongly when adjustment of the EDD had been done at the dating scan.
CONCLUSIONS: Fetuses in which the EDD differs between that calculated by the last menstrual period and that calculated by second-trimester ultrasound measurement seem to have an increased risk for congenital malformations, including chromosomal anomalies. A targeted ultrasound examination for malformation screening might be recommended for this group. A similar policy might be recommended when intrauterine growth restriction, especially of the asymmetrical type, is suspected later in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17290366     DOI: 10.1002/uog.3932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  7 in total

Review 1.  microRNA signatures associated with fetal growth restriction: a systematic review.

Authors:  P Kochhar; M Vukku; R Rajashekhar; A Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.884

2.  Fetal somatic growth trajectory differs by type of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Kriti Puri; Carri R Warshak; Mounira A Habli; Amy Yuan; Rashmi D Sahay; Eileen C King; Allison Divanovic; James F Cnota
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  The problem of confounding in studies of the effect of maternal drug use on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Bengt Källén
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-22

Review 4.  Methodological Issues in the Study of the Development of Pain Responsivity in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Damiano Menin; Marco Dondi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Pregnancy-Related Extracellular Vesicles Revisited.

Authors:  Carmen Elena Condrat; Valentin Nicolae Varlas; Florentina Duică; Panagiotis Antoniadis; Cezara Alina Danila; Dragos Cretoiu; Nicolae Suciu; Sanda Maria Crețoiu; Silviu Cristian Voinea
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Intrauterine growth restriction and congenital malformations: a retrospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Puccio; Mario Giuffré; Maria Piccione; Ettore Piro; Grazia Rinaudo; Giovanni Corsello
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.638

7.  False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Debost-Legrand; Hélène Laurichesse-Delmas; Christine Francannet; Isabelle Perthus; Didier Lémery; Denis Gallot; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.