Douglas D Taylor1, Cicek Gercel-Taylor. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. ddtaylor@louisville.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage (67%) and prospects for significant improvement in survival reside in early diagnosis. While expression patterns of a recently identified biomarker family, microRNA, appear to be characteristic of tumor type and developmental origin, microRNA profiling has been limited to tissue specimens. Tumors actively release exosomes into the peripheral circulation and we now demonstrate the association of microRNAs with circulating tumor-derived exosomes. METHODS: Circulating tumor exosomes were isolated using a modified MACS procedure with anti-EpCAM. Initially, microRNA profiles of ovarian tumors were compared to those of tumor exosomes isolated from the same patients. Levels of 8 microRNAs (miR-21, miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, miR-200b, miR-203, miR-205 and miR-214) previously demonstrated as diagnostic, were compared in exosomes isolated from sera specimens of women with benign disease and various stages of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: MicroRNA from ovarian tumor cells and exosomes from the same patients were positive for 218 of 467 mature microRNAs analyzed. The levels of the 8 specific microRNAs were similar between cellular and exosomal microRNAs (exhibiting correlations from 0.71 to 0.90). While EpCAM-positive exosomes were detectable in both patients with benign ovarian disease and ovarian cancer, exosomal microRNA from ovarian cancer patients exhibited similar profiles, which were significantly distinct from profiles observed in benign disease. Exosomal microRNA could not be detected in normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that microRNA profiling of circulating tumor exosomes could potentially be used as surrogate diagnostic markers for biopsy profiling, extending its utility to screening asymptomatic populations.
OBJECTIVES: Most ovarian cancerpatients are diagnosed at an advanced stage (67%) and prospects for significant improvement in survival reside in early diagnosis. While expression patterns of a recently identified biomarker family, microRNA, appear to be characteristic of tumor type and developmental origin, microRNA profiling has been limited to tissue specimens. Tumors actively release exosomes into the peripheral circulation and we now demonstrate the association of microRNAs with circulating tumor-derived exosomes. METHODS: Circulating tumor exosomes were isolated using a modified MACS procedure with anti-EpCAM. Initially, microRNA profiles of ovarian tumors were compared to those of tumor exosomes isolated from the same patients. Levels of 8 microRNAs (miR-21, miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, miR-200b, miR-203, miR-205 and miR-214) previously demonstrated as diagnostic, were compared in exosomes isolated from sera specimens of women with benign disease and various stages of ovarian cancer. RESULTS: MicroRNA from ovarian tumor cells and exosomes from the same patients were positive for 218 of 467 mature microRNAs analyzed. The levels of the 8 specific microRNAs were similar between cellular and exosomal microRNAs (exhibiting correlations from 0.71 to 0.90). While EpCAM-positive exosomes were detectable in both patients with benign ovarian disease and ovarian cancer, exosomal microRNA from ovarian cancerpatients exhibited similar profiles, which were significantly distinct from profiles observed in benign disease. Exosomal microRNA could not be detected in normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that microRNA profiling of circulating tumor exosomes could potentially be used as surrogate diagnostic markers for biopsy profiling, extending its utility to screening asymptomatic populations.
Authors: Angela Montecalvo; Adriana T Larregina; William J Shufesky; Donna Beer Stolz; Mara L G Sullivan; Jenny M Karlsson; Catherine J Baty; Gregory A Gibson; Geza Erdos; Zhiliang Wang; Jadranka Milosevic; Olga A Tkacheva; Sherrie J Divito; Rick Jordan; James Lyons-Weiler; Simon C Watkins; Adrian E Morelli Journal: Blood Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Els J van der Vlist; Esther N M Nolte-'t Hoen; Willem Stoorvogel; Ger J A Arkesteijn; Marca H M Wauben Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Hanno Matthaei; Dennis Wylie; Maura B Lloyd; Marco Dal Molin; Jon Kemppainen; Skye C Mayo; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Laura Langfield; Bernard F Andruss; Alex T Adai; Ralph H Hruban; Anna E Szafranska-Schwarzbach; Anirban Maitra Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Justin E Hellwinkel; Jasmina S Redzic; Tessa A Harland; Dicle Gunaydin; Thomas J Anchordoquy; Michael W Graner Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Caitlin O McAtee; Christine Booth; Christian Elowsky; Lei Zhao; Jeremy Payne; Teresa Fangman; Steve Caplan; Michael D Henry; Melanie A Simpson Journal: Matrix Biol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 11.583
Authors: Kelly McDaniel; Robert Correa; Tianhao Zhou; Christopher Johnson; Heather Francis; Shannon Glaser; Julie Venter; Gianfranco Alpini; Fanyin Meng Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2013-04-01