Literature DB >> 33538936

Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.

Viral D Tejani1,2, Jeong-Seo Kim3,4, Jacob J Oleson5, Paul J Abbas3,4, Carolyn J Brown3,4, Marlan R Hansen3,6, Bruce J Gantz3,6.   

Abstract

Changes in cochlear implant (CI) design and surgical techniques have enabled the preservation of residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. While most Nucleus Hybrid L24 CI users retain significant acoustic hearing years after surgery, 6-17 % experience a complete loss of acoustic hearing (Roland et al. Laryngoscope. 126(1):175-81. (2016), Laryngoscope. 128(8):1939-1945 (2018); Scheperle et al. Hear Res. 350:45-57 (2017)). Electrocochleography (ECoG) enables non-invasive monitoring of peripheral auditory function and may provide insight into the pathophysiology of hearing loss. The ECoG response is evoked using an acoustic stimulus and includes contributions from the hair cells (cochlear microphonic-CM) as well as the auditory nerve (auditory nerve neurophonic-ANN). Seven Hybrid L24 CI users with complete loss of residual hearing months after surgery underwent ECoG measures before and after loss of hearing. While significant reductions in CMs were evident after hearing loss, all participants had measurable CMs despite having no measurable acoustic hearing. None retained measurable ANNs. Given histological data suggesting stable hair cell and neural counts after hearing loss (e.g., Quesnel et al. Hear Res. 333:225-234. (2016)), the loss of ECoG and audiometric hearing may reflect reduced synaptic input. This is consistent with the theory that residual CM responses coupled with little to no ANN responses reflect a "disconnect" between hair cells and auditory nerve fibers (Fontenot et al. Ear Hear. 40(3):577-591. 2019). This "disconnection" may prevent proper encoding of auditory stimulation at higher auditory pathways, leading to a lack of audiometric responses, even in the presence of viable cochlear hair cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory nerve neurophonic; cochlear microphonic; electric-acoustic stimulation; electrocochleography; hearing preservation; hybrid

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538936      PMCID: PMC7943691          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00785-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  45 in total

1.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Michael Tykocinski; Lawrence T Cohen; Robert S Cowan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Oral vs intratympanic corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven D Rauch; Christopher F Halpin; Patrick J Antonelli; Seilesh Babu; John P Carey; Bruce J Gantz; Joel A Goebel; Paul E Hammerschlag; Jeffrey P Harris; Brandon Isaacson; Daniel Lee; Christopher J Linstrom; Lorne S Parnes; Helen Shi; William H Slattery; Steven A Telian; Jeffrey T Vrabec; Domenic J Reda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Electrode Impedance Fluctuations as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  June Choi; Matthew R Payne; Luke J Campbell; Christo W Bester; Carrie Newbold; Hayden Eastwood; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Molecular mechanisms involved in cochlear implantation trauma and the protection of hearing and auditory sensory cells by inhibition of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase signaling.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Chhavi Gupta; Thomas R Van De Water; Jorge E Bohorquez; Carolyn Garnham; Esperanza Bas; Victoria Maria Talamo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Tatyana Elizabeth Fontenot; Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Margaret Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Holly F Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin David Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Aaron Parkinson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mathieu Forgues; Heather A Koehn; Askia K Dunnon; Stephen H Pulver; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  Review: Clinical perspective on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation, the University of Iowa experience.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Marlan Hansen; Camille C Dunn
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.672

2.  Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Dorina Kallogjeri; Cameron C Wick; Nedim Durakovic; Shannon M Lefler; Amanda J Ortmann; Jacques A Herzog; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Osama Tarabichi; Megan Jensen; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.814

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.