Literature DB >> 24133227

Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Mathieu Forgues1, Heather A Koehn, Askia K Dunnon, Stephen H Pulver, Craig A Buchman, Oliver F Adunka, Douglas C Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

Almost all patients who receive cochlear implants have some acoustic hearing prior to surgery. Electrocochleography (ECoG), or electrophysiological measures of cochlear response to sound, can identify remaining auditory nerve activity that is the basis for this residual hearing and can record potentials from hair cells that are no longer functionally connected to nerve fibers. The ECoG signal is therefore complex, being composed of both hair cell and neural signals. To identify signatures of different sources in the recorded potentials, we collected ECoG data across frequency and intensity from the round window of gerbils before and after treatment with kainic acid, a neurotoxin. Distortions in the recorded waveforms were produced by different sources over different ranges of frequency and intensity. In response to tones at low frequencies and low-to-moderate intensities, the major source of distortion was from neural phase-locking that was sensitive to kainic acid. At high intensities at all frequencies, the distortion was not sensitive to kainic acid and was consistent with asymmetric saturation of the hair cell transducer current. In addition to loss of phase-locking, changes in the envelope after kainic acid treatment indicate that sustained neural firing combines with receptor potentials from hair cells to produce the envelope of the response to tones. These results provide baseline data to interpret comparable recordings from human cochlear implant recipients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; cochlear microphonic; compound action potential; neurophonic; summating potential

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24133227      PMCID: PMC3921406          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00446.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  The influence of transducer operating point on distortion generation in the cochlea.

Authors:  Davud B Sirjani; Alec N Salt; Ruth M Gill; Shane A Hale
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis.

Authors:  A Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear summating potentials. Descriptive aspects.

Authors:  P Dallos; Z G Schoeny; M A Cheatham
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1972

4.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones.

Authors:  D H Johnson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.

Authors:  J Gardi; M Merzenich; C McKean
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

6.  Origin of summating potential.

Authors:  J R Johnstone; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The dynamic DC potential in the cochlea of the guinea pig (summating potential).

Authors:  R Kupperman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Excitotoxic effect of kainic acid on chicken otoacoustic emissions and cochlear potentials.

Authors:  H Sun; R J Salvi; D L Ding; D E Hashino; M Shero; X Y Zheng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Sensitivity, polarity, and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth; D P Corey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Craig A Buchman; Benjamin P Wei; Margaret T Dillon; Shuman He; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  35 in total

1.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  An analytic approach to identifying the sources of the low-frequency round window cochlear response.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Patterns Seen During Electrode Insertion Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Christopher K Giardina; Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Kanthaiah Koka; Robert F Labadie; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Kendall A Hutson; William C Scott; J David Wilson; Kevin E Fox; Maheer M Masood; Christopher K Giardina; Stephen H Pulver; Gilberto D Grana; Charles Askew; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Compound Action Potential in Subjects Receiving a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  William C Scott; Christopher K Giardina; Andrew K Pappa; Tatyana E Fontenot; Meredith L Anderson; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Estimation of neural phase locking from stimulus-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.