Literature DB >> 16151342

Measurement and analysis of access resistance and polarization impedance in cochlear implant recipients.

Michael Tykocinski1, Lawrence T Cohen, Robert S Cowan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impedance measurements are commonly performed at the end of cochlear implant surgery, not only to confirm that all electrodes are working but also to monitor the impedances of the newly implanted electrodes. The current method of testing allows the determination of only the overall electrode impedance but not its components, access resistance and polarization impedance. To determine whether any longitudinal change in the electrode impedance is caused by a change in the endocochlear environment or rather caused by a change in the surface quality of the electrode, it is necessary to extract access resistance and polarization impedance.
METHODS: We applied an impedance model that enabled us to calculate access resistance and polarization impedance after measurement of electrode impedance at three points along the voltage waveform.
RESULTS: The results show that the value of the components of electrode impedance varied with time after surgery: access resistance increased slowly over time, whereas polarization impedance increased up to Week 2 but decreased after commencement of electrical stimulation at that stage. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that a layer of fibrous tissue forms around the electrode within the cochlear canal, resulting in a slow increase of access resistance, whereas a layer of proteins forms on the surface of the electrode in the early phase after implantation. Electrical stimulation appears to disperse this surface layer, thereby reducing both the polarization impedance and electrode impedance.
CONCLUSION: The method presented enables the extraction of more detailed information about the longitudinal changes in the intracochlear environment after cochlear implantation.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16151342     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185056.99888.f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  25 in total

1.  Programming peculiarities in two cochlear implant users with superficial siderosis of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Mariana Hausen Pinna; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens de Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Systemic immunity influences hearing preservation in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Melanie Souter; Hayden Eastwood; Paul Marovic; Gordana Kel; Sarin Wongprasartsuk; Allen F Ryan; Stephen John O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Micropatterned methacrylate polymers direct spiral ganglion neurite and Schwann cell growth.

Authors:  Joseph C Clarke; Bradley W Tuft; John D Clinger; Rachel Levine; Lucas Sievens Figueroa; C Allan Guymon; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Microtopographical features generated by photopolymerization recruit RhoA/ROCK through TRPV1 to direct cell and neurite growth.

Authors:  Shufeng Li; Bradley W Tuft; Linjing Xu; Marc A Polacco; Joseph C Clarke; C Allan Guymon; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Cochlear Implant in Prelingually Deaf Children: Our Experience.

Authors:  Vikram Kulkarni; Shivkumar Raghuwanshi; Ajit Kumar; Gaurav Batni
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-06-21

7.  Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Christie Huang; Dusan Milojevic; Robert Shepherd; Robert Cowan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Bidirectional telemetry controller for neuroprosthetic devices.

Authors:  Vishnu Sharma; Douglas B McCreery; Martin Han; Victor Pikov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.