Literature DB >> 35410721

Review: Clinical perspective on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation, the University of Iowa experience.

Bruce J Gantz1, Marlan Hansen2, Camille C Dunn2.   

Abstract

Preservation of residual acoustic hearing has emerged as an important concept for those individuals undergoing cochlear implantation with residual low frequency hearing. Acoustic plus electric speech processing improves hearing outcomes in quiet, enables melody recognition, preserves spatial hearing if there is acoustic hearing in both ears and significantly improves hearing in noise. The development of our experience with acoustic plus electric processing is reviewed along with clinical trials and patient outcomes that our team has documented over the past twenty years.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic + electric processing; Cochlear implant; EAS; Hearing preservation; Hybrid Cochlear Implant

Year:  2022        PMID： 35410721      PMCID： PMC9482999          DOI： 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN： 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.672


  57 in total

1.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; W S Parkinson; R S Tyler; B J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Shelley Witt; Mary Adamek; Maureen Mehr; Jenny Rogers; Julie Stordahl; Shelly Ringgenberg
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Correlation between word recognition score and intracochlear new bone and fibrous tissue after cochlear implantation in the human.

Authors:  Takefumi Kamakura; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The Impact of Electrode Array Length on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Marie-Charlot Suhling; Omid Majdani; Rolf Salcher; Melanie Leifholz; Andreas Büchner; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes for 139 Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Thin Straight Electrode Array.

Authors:  Michelle Moran; Richard C Dowell; Claire Iseli; Robert J S Briggs
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Hyejin Yang; Jeong-Seo Kim; Helin Hernandez; Jacob J Oleson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

9.  Risk factors for loss of ipsilateral residual hearing after hybrid cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Lina A J Reiss; Jacob J Oleson; Emily S Lundt; Bruce J Gantz; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.