Literature DB >> 23382052

Molecular mechanisms involved in cochlear implantation trauma and the protection of hearing and auditory sensory cells by inhibition of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase signaling.

Adrien A Eshraghi1, Chhavi Gupta, Thomas R Van De Water, Jorge E Bohorquez, Carolyn Garnham, Esperanza Bas, Victoria Maria Talamo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in electrode insertion trauma (EIT) and to test the otoprotective effect of locally delivered AM-111. STUDY
DESIGN: An animal model of cochlear implantation.
METHODS: Guinea pigs' hearing thresholds were measured by auditory brainstem response (ABR) before and after cochlear implantation in four groups: EIT; pretreated with hyaluronate gel 30 minutes before EIT (EIT+Gel); pretreated with hyaluronate gel/AM-111 30 minutes before EIT (EIT+AM-111); and unoperated contralateral ears as controls. Neurofilament, synapsin, and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-phalloidin staining for hair cell counts were performed at 90 days post-EIT. Immunostaining for 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), activated caspase-3, CellROX, and phospho-c-Jun were performed at 24 hours post-EIT.
RESULTS: ABR thresholds increased post-EIT in the cochleae of EIT only and EIT+Gel treated animals. There was no significant increase in hearing thresholds in cochleae from either EIT+AM-111 treated or unoperated control ears. AM-111 protection of organ of Corti sensory elements (i.e., hair cells [HCs], supporting cells [SCs], nerve fibers, and synapses) was documented at 3 months post-EIT. Immunostaining of 24-hour post-EIT specimens demonstrated increased levels of HNE in HCs and SCs; increased levels of CellROX and activation of caspase-3 was observed only in SCs, and phosphorylation of c-Jun occurred only in HCs of the EIT-only and EIT+Gel specimens. There was no immunostaining for either HNE, CellROX, caspase-3, or phospho-c-Jun in the organ of Corti specimens from AM-111 treated cochleae.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular mechanisms involved in programmed cell death of HCs are different than the ones involved in programmed cell death of SCs. Local delivery of AM-111 provided a significant level of protection against EIT-induced hearing losses, HC losses, and damage to neural elements.
Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382052     DOI: 10.1002/lary.23902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  22 in total

1.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Role of C-Jun N-terminal Kinase in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Guixiang Tai
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Hongzheng Zhang; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chiemi Tanaka; Anh Nguyen-Huynh; Katherine Loera; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.

Authors:  Donald L Swiderski; Deborah J Colesa; Aaron P Hughes; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

6.  Micro-CT scan, electron microscopy and optical microscopy study of insertional traumas of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alexia Le Breton; Franck Jegoux; Paul Pilet; Benoit Godey
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Gemaine Stark; Anh T Nguyen-Huynh; Kayce A Spear; Hongzheng Zhang; Chiemi Tanaka; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model.

Authors:  Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Diego Calavia; Maria Antonia Gallego; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  A cool approach to reducing electrode-induced trauma: Localized therapeutic hypothermia conserves residual hearing in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ilmar Tamames; Curtis King; Esperanza Bas; W Dalton Dietrich; Fred Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.

Authors:  Joseph P Roche; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.