| Literature DB >> 33233832 |
Christian Hundshammer1, Oliver Minge1.
Abstract
Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are structurally versatile sugar molecules constituting the third major group of soluble components in human breast milk. Based on the disaccharide lactose, the mammary glands of future and lactating mothers produce a few hundreds of different HMOs implicating that their overall anabolism utilizes rather high amounts of energy. At first sight, it therefore seems contradictory that these sugars are indigestible for infants raising the question of why such an energy-intensive molecular class evolved. However, in-depth analysis of their molecular modes of action reveals that Mother Nature created HMOs for neonatal development, protection and promotion of health. This is not solely facilitated by HMOs in their indigestible form but also by catabolites that are generated by microbial metabolism in the neonatal gut additionally qualifying HMOs as natural prebiotics. This narrative review elucidates factors influencing the HMO composition as well as physiological roles of HMOs on their way through the infant body and within the gut, where a major portion of HMOs faces microbial catabolism. Concurrently, this work summarizes in vitro, preclinical and observational as well as interventional clinical studies that analyzed potential health effects that have been demonstrated by or were related to either human milk-derived or synthetic HMOs or HMO fractions.Entities:
Keywords: antiadhesive; breast feeding; human milk oligosaccharides; immune system; infant food; intestinal barrier; milk content; milk sugars; prebiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33233832 PMCID: PMC7699834 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1(a) Basic building blocks of human milk oligosaccharides; (b) effect of Secretor and Lewis genes on the composition of HMOs; and (c) main neutral fucosylated, neutral non-fucosylated and acidic HMOs. Abbreviations: 2′FL: 2′-fucosyllactose; 3FL: 3-fucosyllactose; LNFP I, II, III, IV, V, VI: lacto-N-fucopentaose I, II, II, IV, V, IV; F-LNH I, II: fucosyl-lacto-N-hexaose I, II; A-Tetra: A-tetrasaccharide; DFL: difucosyllactose; LNDFH I, II: lacto-N-difucosylhexaose I, II; LNnDFH: lacto-N-neodifucosylhexaose; DFLNH I, II: difucosyllacto-N-hexaose I, II; DFLNnH: difucosyllacto-N-neohexaose; DF-p-LNH: difucosyl-para-lacto-N-hexaose; DF-p-LNnH: difucosyl-para-lacto-N-neohexaose; TF-LNH: trifucosyl-lacto-N-hexaose; LNT: lacto-N-tetraose; LNnT: lacto-N-neotetraose; LNH: lacto-N-hexaose; LNnH: lacto-N-neohexaose; 3′/6′GL: 3′-/6′-galactosyloligosaccharide; 3′/6′SL: 3′-/6′- sialyllactose; LST a, b, c: sialyllacto-N-tetraose a, b, c; DSLNT: disialyllacto-N-tetraose.
Studies that quantified absolute human milk oligosaccharide concentrations.
| HMO Content/g∙L−1 | Period of Observation/d | Location of Study | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5–18.5 | 1–90 | France | N/A | [ |
| 15.2–16.7 | 2–7 | France | 15 | [ |
| 12.9–20.9 | 4–120 | Italy | 46 | [ |
| 7.9 | 2–28 | Germany | 10 | [ |
| 8.6–19.6 | 10–120 | USA | 45 | [ |
| 5.3–6.5 | 180 | Malawi | 88 | [ |
| 7.8–22.4 | 1–140 | China | 30 | [ |
Secretor and Lewis genetic predisposition of different populations. Note that not all studies differentiated between all groups.
| Se+Le+/% | Se−Le+/% | Se+Le−/% | Se−Le−/% | Location of Study | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | 20.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | Germany | 50 | [ |
| 71.7 | 24.5 | 3.8 | Burkina Faso | 53 | [ | |
| 73.3 | 23.3 | 3.3 | Italy | 50 | [ | |
| 73.0 | 17.0 | 10.0 | Germany | 30 | [ | |
| 45.0 | 10.0 | 28.0 | 26.0 | Gambia | 60 | [ |
| 55.6 | 28.6 | 11.1 | 4.8 | Italy | 63 | [ |
| 46.9 | 34.4 | 18.8 | Spain | 32 | [ | |
| 73.0 | 20.0 | 7.0 | - | China | 30 | [ |
| 67.0 | 24.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | Vietnam | 141 | [ |
| 75.0 | 19.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | Switzerland | 25 | [ |
| 70.0 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | Switzerland | 290 | [ |
| 75.6 | 11.5 | 11.5 | 1.3 | Brazil | 78 | [ |
| 76.7 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 | China | 116 | [ |
| 77.0 | 7.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | Germany | 60 | [ |
| 58.3 | 20.8 | 16.7 | 4.2 | China | 24 | [ |
Figure 2Change of the HMO content during the course of lactation. The mean content of total HMOs (yellow) decreases by up to 67% during the course of lactation, which has been shown by Viverge et al. [6] and Coppa et al. [9] (top images). Differentiation of HMOs into the three groups of neutral fucosylated, neutral non-fucosylated and sialylated HMOs shows a similar trend for the individual groups (Xu et al. [4] and Elwakiel et al. [5]). Compared to colostrum, these respectively decrease by up to 61%, 86% and 66% in mature milk.
Figure 3Most dominant HMOs of term-delivering mothers differentiated by the Secretor status. The ten most dominant neutral fucosylated (except for Se−Le−), the four most important neutral non-fucosylated and the six most important acidic HMOs are respectively displayed in red to light orange, blue and violet to pink.
Effects of HMOs on different pathogens. If not stated differently, the antiadhesive activity of HMOs describes the competitive interference of lectin-glycan association.
| Pathogen | Strain/Subtype | HMO/HMO Fraction | Activity | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CBS 113.26 | 3′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| SC5314 | Total HMO | Cellular and gene expression of hyphal morphogenesis | [ |
|
| HM-1:IMSS | Total HMO, neutral non-fucosylated HMO, LNT, LNFP II, LNFP III | Antiadhesive, cytoprotective | [ |
|
| ATCC 19606 | Total HMO | Antimicrobial | [ |
|
| 81–176, 287ip, 84sp, 166ip, 10sp, 57sp | Total HMO, 2′FL | Invasion protection, antiadhesive | [ |
|
| N/A | Total HMO, neutral non-fucosylated HMO, 8 individual HMOs | TcdA toxin inhibition | [ |
|
| N/A | 11 individual HMOs | TcdB toxin inhibition | [ |
|
| O18:K1 | 3′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| N/A | 20 individual HMOs | HLT, Stx1, Stx2 toxin inhibition | [ |
|
| O119, E2348/69, 01163, 0111:H2, 01736, 0119:H6, 851/71, O142:H6 | Total HMO, neutral HMO, fucosylated HMO, acidic HMO, 2′FL, 3FL, DFL, LNFP I, LNFP II, LNFP III, LNT, LNnT, 3′SL, 6′SL | Sta toxin inhibition, antiadhesive | [ |
|
| H4 CFA/I, 23 CFA/II, F18 | Acidic HMO, 2′FL, 3′SL, 6′SL, DSLNT, LST a, 3′SL, 3FL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| CTF073, FVL 25 Fimbria P-like | Total HMO, neutral, tri-, penta-, high molecular weight HMO, sialylated HMO, 3′SL, 6′SL, DSLNT, LST a, 3′SL3FL | Antiadhesive, antiinvasive, cytoprotective | [ |
|
| DSM1707 | 2′FL, 3FL, LNFP II, LNnFP V, LNnDFH II, 3′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| 1832, CP22, 1351, | 3′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| EGD-e | Total HMO | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| 8013 | Acidic and neutral HMO | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| Serovar fyris | Acidic, neutral low weight HMO, 6′SL, 2′FL, 3FL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| USA300 | Total HMO | Antimicrobial, antibiofilm | [ |
|
| CNCTC 10/84, GB590, GB2, ST III (COH-1, A909, NCTC) | Total HMO, neutral HMO, fucosylated HMO, LNT, LNnT, DFL, LNFP I, II, III, LNnH, LNDFHI, LST a, LST c, DSLNT, 3′SL, 6′S | Antimicrobial, antibiofilm | [ |
|
| R6, SIII, AII | LNT, LNnT, 3′SL, 6′SL, LSTc, 3′SLNnT, 3′GL | Antiadhesive | [ |
|
| N/A | Acidic HMO, neutral high. mol. weight HMO, 18 individual neutral and sialylated HMOs, 3′SL | Antiadhesive, cholera toxin B inhibition | [ |
| Influenza virus | H1N1, H1Nx, H9N2 | 3′SL, 6′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |
| Human immunodeficiency virus | N/A | Total HMO | Antiadhesive | [ |
| Norovirus | G.I, GII.4, GII.10, G.17 | 2′FL, 3FL, LNFP I | Antiadhesive | [ |
| Respiratory syncytial virus | NM232 | 2′FL, 3′SL, LNnT | Antiadhesive | [ |
| Rotavirus | OSU; G1P, G2P | 3FL, 3′SL, 6′SL | Antiadhesive | [ |