M Elwakiel, J A Hageman1, W Wang2, I M Szeto2, J B van Goudoever3, K A Hettinga, H A Schols. 1. Biometris-Applied Statistics , Wageningen University & Research , Droevendaalsesteeg 1 , Wageningen 6708 PB , The Netherlands. 2. Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd. , Jinshan Road 8 , Hohhot 010110 , China. 3. Department of Pediatrics , Emma Children's Hospital - AMC , Meibergdreef 9 , Amsterdam 1100 DD , The Netherlands.
Abstract
To study the variability in human milk oligosaccharide (HMO) composition of Chinese human milk over a 20-wk lactation period, HMO profiles of 30 mothers were analyzed using CE-LIF. This study showed that total HMO concentrations in Chinese human milk decreased significantly over a 20-wk lactation period, independent of the mother's SeLe status, although with individual variations. In addition, total acidic and neutral HMO concentrations in Chinese human milk decreased over lactation, and levels are driven by their mother's SeLe status. Analysis showed that total neutral fucosylated HMO concentrations in Chinese human milk were higher in the two secretor groups as compared to the nonsecretor group. On the basis of the total neutral fucosylated HMO concentrations in Chinese human milk, HMO profiles within the Se+Le+ group can be divided into two subgroups. HMOs that differed in level between Se+Le+ subgroups were 2'FL, DF-L, LNFP I, and F-LNO. HMO profiles in Dutch human milk also showed Se+Le+ subgroup division, with 2'FL, LNT, and F-LNO as the driving force.
To study the variability in humanmilkoligosaccharide (HMO) composition of Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period, HMO profiles of 30 mothers were analyzed using CE-LIF. This study showed that total HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk decreased significantly over a 20-wk lactation period, independent of the mother's SeLe status, although with individual variations. In addition, total acidic and neutral HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk decreased over lactation, and levels are driven by their mother's SeLe status. Analysis showed that total neutral fucosylated HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk were higher in the two secretor groups as compared to the nonsecretor group. On the basis of the total neutral fucosylated HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk, HMO profiles within the Se+Le+ group can be divided into two subgroups. HMOs that differed in level between Se+Le+ subgroups were 2'FL, DF-L, LNFP I, and F-LNO. HMO profiles in Dutch humanmilk also showed Se+Le+ subgroup division, with 2'FL, LNT, and F-LNO as the driving force.
Humanmilk is the natural food for infants
after birth, providing
not only nutrition but also protection against infectious diseases.[1] Humanmilk contains a variety of milk components
like proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, which support the healthy growth
and development of infants.[2] Specific protective
components like oligosaccharides and immune-active proteins in humanmilk are present in higher concentrations in early lactation than
in late lactation, while other nutritional components like lactose
and fatty acids increase over lactation.[3]Lactose and humanmilkoligosaccharides (HMOs) are both part
of
the carbohydrate fraction in humanmilk.[4,5] Lactose is
a disaccharide formed by a β-1,4 linkage between galactose and
glucose, and its concentrations in humanmilk range from 56 to 69
g/L over lactation,[3−5] although with large individual variation. The enzyme
lactase is present in the small intestine, and breaks down lactose
into glucose and galactose,[6−8] although lactose may end up in
the colon at early life. HMOs are complex lactose-based glycans synthesized
in the mammary gland throughout lactation.[9−11] HMOs are composed
of five monosaccharides: glucose, galactose, N-acetylglucosamine,
fucose, and N-acetylneuramic acid. During the synthesis
of HMOs, lactose can be elongated by β-1,3 linkages to lacto-N-biose or by β-1,6 linkages to N-acetyllactosamine, and these core HMO structures can be further
decorated with fucose or sialic acid residues.[9−11] HMOs and lactose
are resistant to gastric and duodenal digestion, able to modulate
the immune system of the intestinal mucosa, and influence the composition
of the gut microbiome.[12−17] The size, structure, and function differ between HMOs.[18] More than 100 different structures have been
identified and characterized in humanmilk, including many isomers.[19] Total HMO concentrations in humanmilk ranged
from 5 to 25 g/L over a 6 mo lactation period.[19] HMOs can be classified as neutral or acidic HMOs, with
acidic oligosaccharides generally being present at a 10-fold lower
concentration than neutral oligosaccharides.[20,21]The type and amount of HMOs present in humanmilk depend on
the
genetic profile of the mother, resulting in four major milk-types.[22−25] Fucosyltransferase (FUT) 2 is encoded by the Se gene and determines
the presence of α1,2-fucosylated oligosaccharides in humanmilk.
On the basis of the Lewis blood group system, FUT3 is encoded by the
Le gene, which determines the presence of α1,4-fucosylated oligosaccharides
in humanmilk. Women with an active Se locus are classified as secretors
(Se+), whereas women with an active Le locus are classified
as Lewis positive (Le+). Women without FUT2 or FUT3 activity
are classified as nonsecretors (Se–) or Lewis negative
(Le–), lacking α1,2-fucosylated or α1,4-fucosylated
oligosaccharides, respectively. A large variation in HMO composition
within the four major milk-type groups has been reported,[26] and might be explained by mutations in the Se
and Le genes.[27] Additional Se and Le phenotypes
have been reported, the so-called weak Se and Le phenotype, respectively,
mostly found in the Asian population,[27] and less common in European population. Weak Se and Le phenotypes
are probably able to produce FUT2- and FUT3-mediated oligosaccharides,
respectively, with fucosylated HMO levels lower than typically found
in regular milk of Se and Le phenotypes.[19] For example, it has been reported that FUT2- and FUT3-mediated oligosaccharides,
such as 2′fucosyllactose (2′FL) and 3FL, respectively,
can be present in humanmilk in lower amounts.[19] HMO profiles were also shown to be different within and
between breastfeeding populations from >10 countries.[28−30] Although humanmilk of most individuals can be grouped into the
four SeLe groups, there exists a large variation in HMO levels within
SeLe groups,[26,28,31] but none of these studies so far tried to find patterns in HMO profiles
within the four milk-type groups.The main objective of this
study was to investigate the level and
type of HMOs in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period.
HMO profiles of 30 mothers over the course of lactation were investigated
using capillary electrophoresis-laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF).
To investigate whether the observed clustering in HMO composition
is typical for only Chinese mothers, HMO profiles of 28 Dutch mothers
were determined 4 wk after delivery.
Materials
and Methods
Setup of Study and Sample Collection
Chinese participants
were recruited between August 2014 and November 2015. The Yili Innovation
Center (Hohhot, CN) took care of the humanmilk collection. Women
living in the Hohhot region collected milk samples using a humanmilk
pump. For every time point, a volume of 10 mL was collected in a polypropylene
bottle. Milk bottles were shaken gently, aliquoted into 1 mL Eppendorf
tubes, and stored at −20 °C. Milk samples of 30 mothers
were assessed in wk 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20. Humanmilk collection
was approved by the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical
Trials (ChiECRCT-20150017). Written informed consent was obtained
for all of the Chinese participants. Dutch participants were recruited
between September 2015 and June 2016. Humanmilk samples of women
who gave birth at the obstetric department of the VU Medical Center
in Amsterdam were collected by the Dutch HumanMilk Bank. A volume
of 10 mL was collected in a polypropylene bottle and stored at −20
°C. Milk of 28 Dutch mothers was collected, after 4 wk of delivery.
Humanmilk collection was approved by the VU Medical Center institutional
committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all mothers.
Sample Preparation, Labeling, and Data Analysis
HMOs
were isolated and extracted from humanmilk, as described previously.[20] Defatting of the humanmilk samples was followed
by protein precipitation, and the pellet obtained after centrifugation
containing denatured proteins was removed. HMOs present in the supernatant
were isolated via solid-phase extraction on graphitized carbon cartridges
(Alltech, Deerfield, U.S.). Subsequently, the isolated HMOs were labeled
with fluorescent 9-aminopyrene-1,4,6-trisulfonate (APTS), as described
previously.[20] During derivatization, oligosaccharides
are linked in a molar ratio of 1:1 to the negatively charged label
APTS. After labeling of the HMOs, the samples were analyzed using
CE-LIF, as described previously.[20] Samples
were measured in triplicate, and xylose was used as the internal standard.
HMOs were identified using commercially available standards, and the
elution behavior of HMOs was identified in existing literature.[20] Quantification was done using the molar response
factor of APTS labeled xylose, and concentrations compared nicely
with known quantities of available HMOs measured. HMO standards 3′-
and 6′-sialyllactose (SL) were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, MO). The HMO standards, 2′- and 3FL, sialyllacto-N-tetraose (S-LNT), LNFP I–III, lacto-N-difucosylhexaose (LNDFH) I, fucosyllacto-N-hexaose
(F-LNH) III, and lacto-N-hexaose (LNH) were purchased
from Dextra (Reading, UK). Difucosyllactose (DF-L) was provided by
Elicityl OligoTech (Crolles, FR), while lacto-N-tetraose
(LNT) and disialyllacto-N-tetraose (DS-LNT) were
purchased from Carbosynth (Berkshire, UK). For data analysis, Chromeleon
7.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, U.S.) was used. CE-LIF peak
areas were converted to the corresponding HMO concentration in nanomoles
g/L.
Statistical Analysis
Total HMO concentrations in Chinese
humanmilk over lactation were compared and correlated with maternal
characteristics (age, parity, body mass index) and socioecomic indicators
(employment status and educational background) using SPSS (IBM Corp.,
NY). The scales for educational background, as well as for employment
status, were made from items of a three-point Likert scale. The scale
for parity consisted of two. Participants did not have missing values
for the categorical items in this study. Distributional aspects of
the quantitative variables (age, body mass index, total HMO concentrations)
were assessed by histograms (Gaussian distribution), QQ plots (normal
distribution), Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (normal distribution),
and by asymmetry and kurtosis values (between −3 and 3). The
values of mother 8 at wk 12 postpartum were excluded from analysis.
The quantitative variables were assessed before regression analysis
for linearity, univariate and bivariate outliers, and homoscedasticity,
using scatterplot matrices, box plots, and residue plots, respectively.
For statistical analysis, a t-test for independent
samples, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression were used. The significance
level was set at α = 0.05.Humanmilk was assigned to
their mother’s SeLe status using 2′FL, LNFP I, LNDFH
I, and LNT, as described previously.[20] The
first three structures exclusively qualified the Se+Le+, Se–Le+, and Se+Le– groups. In addition, average concentrations of LNT
make a clear distinction between group Se+ and Se– groups, which can be used as extra information next to the absence
of α1,2-fucosylated or α1,4-fucosylated oligosaccharides
in the Se–Le– group.Interpretation
of the HMO profiles in humanmilk was facilitated
by hierarchical clustering using R (Lucent Technologies, NJ), with
Euclidean distance measure and Ward’s linkage method. Hierarchical
clustering was performed to detect and identify SeLe subgroups based
on total, acidic, neutral, and individual HMO concentrations in Chinese
humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period. HMO concentrations in Dutch
humanmilk were evaluated in a similar way. The total HMO concentrations
are based on 14 HMOs identified in this study, which are expected
to present about 90% of all oligosaccharides present in humanmilk.
Results and Discussion
Total Lactose and HMO Concentrations
To investigate
the variability of lactose and HMOs in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk
lactation period, lactose and HMO profiles of 30 mothers were analyzed
using CE-LIF. Lactose concentrations were ranging from 40 to 85 g/L
over a 20-wk lactation period (Figure ). Lactose levels in Chinese humanmilk increased in
the first 4 wk of lactation, then started to decline. Total HMO concentrations
in Chinese humanmilk, as a sum of all individual HMOs (Supporting Information, data file), were ranging
from 8 to 23 g/L over lactation (Figure ). The 14 HMOs identified in this study represent
about 90% of the oligosaccharides present in humanmilk (Supporting Information, data file). Humanmilk
in early lactation (wk 1 and 2) contained higher total HMO concentrations
than in intermediate (wk 4 and 8) and late lactation (wk 12 and 20).
Figure 1
Total
lactose and HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese human milk
of 30 mothers over a 20-wk lactation period. Error bars indicate the
standard deviation. (a,b) Different alphabet letters indicate different
lactose and HMO concentrations in human milk (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05) between different time points in lactation.
Total
lactose and HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese humanmilk
of 30 mothers over a 20-wk lactation period. Error bars indicate the
standard deviation. (a,b) Different alphabet letters indicate different
lactose and HMO concentrations in humanmilk (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05) between different time points in lactation.The lactose and total HMO concentrations
in Chinese humanmilk
over lactation (Figure ) match with these observed in earlier studies, with average values
of 56–69 g/L3 and 5–25 g/L,[18] respectively, with large individual variation. A change
in lactose levels is expected in the first 2 wk of lactation due to
the general increase in nutritional components in milk.[4,5] Transition milk is produced from a couple of days up to 2 wk postpartum,
supporting the growth and development of the rapidly growing infant.
It has been previously reported that levels of lactose levels are
low in colostrum, increase in transitional milk, and then remain constant
in mature milk;[5] however, lactose levels
may be more variable in mature milk.[4] Milk
becomes fully mature between 4 and 6 wk postpartum, and contains higher
amounts of nutrients as compared to bioactive components.[4,5] In early life, infants have an immature intestinal immune system,
making them more vulnerable to infection by opportunistic pathogens
in early lactation.[1,2] The high HMO level in colostrum
may provide protection to the infant in this sensitive stage of its
development.[10,13]Total HMO concentrations
in humanmilk of Chinese mothers over
a 20-wk lactation period, as presented in Figure , varied significantly among mothers (Figure ). Although total
HMO concentrations were always higher in early lactation than in intermediate
and late lactation, the rate of decline varied among mothers. The
total HMO concentrations, for example, for mothers 11 and 25 both
started around 26 g/L, although showing the lowest (38%) and highest
(85%) decline over lactation (Figure ). As shown in Figure , the lowest concentrations in colostrum (9.9 g/L)
and mature milk (3.7 g/L) were linked to mother 4, whereas the highest
concentrations in colostrum (33.4 g/L) and mature milk (25.4 g/L)
were found for mother 28 and 11, respectively.
Figure 2
Total HMO concentrations
(g/L) in Chinese human milk of 30 individual
mothers over a 20-wk lactation period. Error bars indicate the standard
deviation.
Total HMO concentrations
(g/L) in Chinese humanmilk of 30 individual
mothers over a 20-wk lactation period. Error bars indicate the standard
deviation.Information collected from individual
Chinese mothers, their total
HMO concentrations, and SeLe status are provided in Table S1. No correlation could be found by ANOVA and multiple
regression analysis between the maternal characteristics (age, parity,
and socioecomic status) and the total HMO concentrations up to 20
wk (results not shown). Body mass index seems to be positively correlated
with total HMO concentrations at wk 1 and 2, whereas no significant
relationship was observed at later time points (results not shown).
Total HMO concentrations were lower for mothers with a low body mass
index in wk 1 and 2. Several studies have suggested that mother’s
body mass index might influence the total HMO composition in humanmilk composition, especially colostrum,[15,16,28] but the underlying mechanism is not yet clear.
Secretor and Lewis Histo-blood Group System
Milk samples
were assigned to their mother’s SeLe status (Table S1 and Figure S1). Twenty-two out of the 30 Chinese
mothers can be assigned to the Se+Le+ group
(73%), while 6 and 2 out of the 30 mothers were assigned to the Se–Le+ (20%) and Se+Le– (7%) groups, respectively. Milk samples from Se–Le– mothers were not present in this study. Distributions
of these phenotypes vary among populations, and the frequency of the
secretor phenotype in the Chinese population was previously estimated
to be between 50% and 70%,[29,30] which match with the
findings in this study. The outcomes of this study are also in line
with another performed study on Chinese humanmilk,[19] where 21% of the samples contained levels of 2’FL below
the limit of quantification, similar in frequency for the Se–Le+ group in the European population.[19] Subsequently, total HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk for the three SeLe groups decreased over a 20-wk lactation period
(Figure ), independent
of the mother’s SeLe status. The total HMO concentrations in
Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period for the Se+Le+, Se–Le+, and Se+Le– groups were 8.1–23.0, 6.5–20.0,
and 9.4–23.5 g/L, respectively, and fall within the range of
all combined SeLe groups over lactation.[18]
Figure 3
Total
HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese human milk of 30 mothers
over a 20-wk lactation period categorized per SeLe group. Error bars
indicate the standard deviation. Se+Le+ milk-type
group n = 22, Se–Le+ milk-type group n = 6, and Se+Le– milk-type group n = 2. (a–c)
Different alphabet letters indicate different HMO concentrations in
human milk (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05)
between different time points in lactation per SeLe group.
Total
HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese humanmilk of 30 mothers
over a 20-wk lactation period categorized per SeLe group. Error bars
indicate the standard deviation. Se+Le+milk-type
group n = 22, Se–Le+ milk-type group n = 6, and Se+Le– milk-type group n = 2. (a–c)
Different alphabet letters indicate different HMO concentrations in
humanmilk (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05)
between different time points in lactation per SeLe group.
Acidic and Neutral HMO Concentrations
The total acidic
and total neutral HMO fractions in humanmilk per mother and per time
point in lactation are available in Table S2. For both the Se+Le+ (n =
22) and the Se+Le– (n = 2) groups (Figure , A and C), the concentrations for the total neutral fucosylated HMO
fraction decreased with 10.3 and 7.2 g/L over lactation, respectively,
while the concentrations of the total acidic and neutral nonfucosylated
HMO fractions even decreased relatively faster over lactation. For
the Se–Le+ (n = 6) milk
type, the concentrations for the total neutral nonfucosylated HMO
fraction were decreasing the most with 7.6 g/L over lactation (Figure B).
Figure 4
Concentrations of total
acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated
and fucosylated) HMO fractions in Chinese human milk over a 20-wk
lactation period for (A) Se+Le+ milk-type group n = 22, (B) Se–Le+ milk-type
group n = 6, and (C) Se+Le– milk-type group n = 2.
Concentrations of total
acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated
and fucosylated) HMO fractions in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk
lactation period for (A) Se+Le+milk-type group n = 22, (B) Se–Le+ milk-type
group n = 6, and (C) Se+Le– milk-type group n = 2.For the Se+ groups, higher amounts were found
for the
total neutral fucosylated HMO fraction as compared to the Se– group. Despite the absence of the FUT2 enzyme for the Se–Le+ group, and different profiles of three groups of HMOs
in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period, concentrations
of the total neutral nonfucosylated HMO fraction might function as
compensation, which possibly explains why the total HMO concentration
ends up being the same for all genetic groups (Figure ). However, having very few individuals in
the Se–Le+ and Se+Le– milk-type groups complicates comparison between groups. The concentrations
of the three groups of HMOs expressed in percentages in Chinese humanmilk for the Se+Le+ and Se–Le+ milk-type groups over lactation can be found in Figure S2. The data of the Se+Le– milk-type group are not displayed in Figure S2, because it showed identical patterns over time
with the Se+Le+milk-type. The ratios between
total acidic and total neutral HMO concentrations for the Se+Le+milk-type and Se–Le+ milk-type
group were ranging from 13:87 to 12:88 and from 28:72 to 40:60 over
lactation (Figure S2), respectively, indicating
that acidic HMOs over time might be relatively more dominant in the
Se–Le+ milk-type group than in the Se+Le+milk-type group. Overall, total acidic and
total neutral HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk per SeLe group
vary over the course of lactation, with overall higher total neutral
HMO concentration in all groups.
Se+Le+ Subgroups in Chinese Human Milk
To investigate the observed
variability in total acidic and total
neutral (nonfucosylated and fucosylated) HMO concentrations in humanmilk of Chinese mothers for the three SeLe groups over a 20-wk lactation
period, total acidic and total neutral HMO concentrations per mother
were examined by clustering analysis. Statistical analysis confirmed
the clear difference that exists between Se– and
Se+ groups (Figure , cluster I/II versus III). However, with concentrations of
the total acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated and fucosylated)
HMO fractions in humanmilk per mother, Se+Le+ mothers could be divided into two subgroups (Figure , clusters I and II). The size of the Se–Le+ (n = 6) and Se+Le– (n = 2) groups was
too small to detect any subgroups. Cluster III consisted only of Se–Le+ mothers. Milk from the two mothers having
Se+Le– could not be clustered and end
up in the Se+Le+ group (Figure ).
Figure 5
Hierarchical cluster analysis of total acidic
and total neutral
(nonfucosylated and fucosylated) HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese
human milk per mother over a 20-wk lactation period. (I) Se+Le+ milk-type group I, (II) Se+Le+ milk-type group II, and (III) Se–Le+ milk-type.
Hierarchical cluster analysis of total acidic
and total neutral
(nonfucosylated and fucosylated) HMO concentrations (g/L) in Chinese
humanmilk per mother over a 20-wk lactation period. (I) Se+Le+milk-type group I, (II) Se+Le+milk-type group II, and (III) Se–Le+ milk-type.The 2 Se+Le+ subgroups, displayed in Figure , seem to be distinguished
by their total neutral fucosylated HMO fraction (Figure ). The concentrations of the
total neutral fucosylated HMO fraction are significantly different
and are almost 20% higher in subgroup I than in subgroup II (Figure ). The concentrations
of the total acid and total neutral nonfucosylated HMO fraction did
not differ significantly between the 2 Se+Le+ subgroups.
Figure 6
Concentrations of the total acidic and total neutral (fucosylated
and nonfucosylated) HMO fractions for the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Chinese human milk over a 20-wk lactation period.
The Se+Le+ milk-type group (22 of the 30 mothers,
73%) can be divided into group I = 12 (40%) and group II = 10 (33%).
“*” indicates significant differences (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05).
Concentrations of the total acidic and total neutral (fucosylated
and nonfucosylated) HMO fractions for the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation period.
The Se+Le+milk-type group (22 of the 30 mothers,
73%) can be divided into group I = 12 (40%) and group II = 10 (33%).
“*” indicates significant differences (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05).The phenomena of the Se+Le+ subgroup
formation
might be a consequence of the observation that Se and Le genes can
contain mutations.[27] Besides the full absence
of FUT2 and FUT3, two different phenotypes have been found, so-called
weak Se and Le phenotypes, respectively.[27] Because of modifications in the amino acid sequence, the activity
of the FUT2 or FUT3 enzyme can be reduced, thereby possibly leading
to a decrease in the synthesis of HMOs in one of the subgroups.[19] From the table containing all individual HMO
concentrations (Supporting Information, data file), it could be deducted that HMOs that differed between Se+Le+ subgroups were 2′FL, DF-L, LNFP I, and F-LNO
(Figure ), having
in common α1,2-fucosylated linkages to the core HMO structures.
Figure 7
HMO concentrations
(g/L) in Chinese human milk over a 20-wk lactation
period per Se+Le+ subgroup. (I) Se+Le+ milk-type group I, (II) Se+Le+ milk-type group II. “*” indicates significant differences
(two-sided t-test, α < 0.05). Other than
2′FL, LNFP I, and LNDFH I, isomers are not further specified.
HMO concentrations
(g/L) in Chinese humanmilk over a 20-wk lactation
period per Se+Le+ subgroup. (I) Se+Le+milk-type group I, (II) Se+Le+milk-type group II. “*” indicates significant differences
(two-sided t-test, α < 0.05). Other than
2′FL, LNFP I, and LNDFH I, isomers are not further specified.The reason for the variation in
these specific HMOs in this study
(Figure ) is not yet
clarified. However, previous studies have reported that levels of 2’FL and LNFP I were found below normal ranges in humanmilk from
a small group of Chinese participants.[19] Gene mutations are not limited to the FUT2 enzyme activity, because
various mutations have also been reported in the Le gene encoding
for the FUT3 enzyme. In humanmilk collected from the Chinese mothers,
variation based on FUT3-mediated oligosaccharides in Se+Le+ and Se–Le+ groups could
not be seen. Additionally, it has been noticed that 3FL, as indicator
for the FUT3 enzyme, was removed in the pretreatment step, and therefore
3FL was not able to be detected in the samples of this study.
Se+Le+ Subgroups in Dutch Human Milk
To investigate
whether the observed differentiation in Se+Le+ subgroups in Chinese humanmilk also applies to other
populations, HMO profiles from 28 Dutch mothers were collected 4 wk
after delivery and analyzed. Total HMO concentrations measured in
Dutch humanmilk, as a sum of the 14 HMOs (Supporting Information, data file), ranged from 4 to 27 g/L 4 wk postpartum
(Table S3), independent of the mother’s
SeLe status and body mass index (results not shown).Milk samples
were also assigned to their mother’s SeLe status (Table 3). Fourteen Dutch mothers can be assigned
to the Se+Le+ group (50%), while 11 and 3 mothers
are identified as belonging to the Se–Le+ (39%) and Se+Le– (11%) groups, respectively.
Milk samples from Se–Le– mothers
were not present in this study. The distribution over the four SeLe
groups for the Dutch mothers did not correspond with previously reported
numbers reporting 70–80% being Se+Le+ for the European population[21−25] and 80% for the Dutch population.[20] These
unexpected proportions should not affect the analysis, as the group
for Se+Le+ mothers was large enough to perform
cluster analysis, and the observed uncommon ratio between SeLe groups
made it even possible to investigate the Se–Le+ group in more detail. After clustering analysis, HMO levels
in milk of 28 Dutch mothers also showed Se+Le+ subgroup division (Figure ). Two Se+Le+ mothers (8%) did not fall
in either the Se+Le+ subgroup I or II (Figure ). The Se–Le+ milk-type (39%) can be roughly divided into group
III = 6 (21%), group IV = 2 (11%), and group V = 3 (7%).
Figure 8
Hierarchical
clustering analysis based on concentrations of the
total acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated and fucosylated) HMO
fractions (g/L) in Dutch human milk per mother collected after 4 wk
of delivery.
Hierarchical
clustering analysis based on concentrations of the
total acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated and fucosylated) HMO
fractions (g/L) in Dutch humanmilk per mother collected after 4 wk
of delivery.As shown in Figure , there is a lot
of variation in HMO concentrations in Dutch humanmilk for the Se–Le+ group (cluster III–V).
However, no significant difference could be found in concentrations
of the total acidic and total neutral (nonfucosylated and fucosylated)
HMO fractions between the Se–Le+ subgroups
(data not shown). Milk of the Dutch mothers categorized in the Se+Le+ group (Figure ) can be divided into two subgroups (I and II) on the
basis of the concentrations of the neutral fucosylated HMO fraction
(Figure ), like it
was done for the Se+Le+ group in Chinese humanmilk (Figure ), however,
with 2′FL, LNT, and F-LNO contributing to the differentiation
more than the other HMOs (Figure ).
Figure 9
Concentrations of the total acidic and total neutral (fucosylated
and nonfucosylated) HMO fractions for the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Dutch human milk collected 4 wk postpartum.
The Se+Le+ milk-type group (14 of the 28 mothers,
50%) can be divided into group I = 6 (21%), group II = 6 (21%), and
group IV = 2 (8%). The two Se+Le+ mothers (8%),
which could not be grouped into Se+Le+ subgroup
I and II, were excluded from comparison. “*” indicates
significant differences (two-sided t-test, α
< 0.05).
Figure 10
HMO concentrations (g/L)
of the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Dutch human milk
after 4 wk of delivery. (I) Se+Le+ milk-type
group I, (II) Se+Le+ milk-type group II. “*”
indicates significant
differences (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05).
Other than 2′FL, LNFP I, and LNDFH I, isomers are not further
specified.
Concentrations of the total acidic and total neutral (fucosylated
and nonfucosylated) HMO fractions for the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Dutch humanmilk collected 4 wk postpartum.
The Se+Le+milk-type group (14 of the 28 mothers,
50%) can be divided into group I = 6 (21%), group II = 6 (21%), and
group IV = 2 (8%). The two Se+Le+ mothers (8%),
which could not be grouped into Se+Le+ subgroup
I and II, were excluded from comparison. “*” indicates
significant differences (two-sided t-test, α
< 0.05).HMO concentrations (g/L)
of the two Se+Le+ subgroups in Dutch humanmilk
after 4 wk of delivery. (I) Se+Le+milk-type
group I, (II) Se+Le+milk-type group II. “*”
indicates significant
differences (two-sided t-test, α < 0.05).
Other than 2′FL, LNFP I, and LNDFH I, isomers are not further
specified.Although the levels
of HMOs, like DF-L and LNFP I, do not differ
significantly between the Se+Le+ subgroups in
Dutch humanmilk (Figure ), a trend was visible that concentrations were slightly higher
for Se+Le+ subgroup I as compared to subgroup
II, which was much more clear for Chinese humanmilk. Levels of DF-L
and LNFP I were significantly different between the Se+Le+ subgroups in Chinese humanmilk, also higher in Se+Le+ subgroup I than in subgroup II (Figure ). Subsequently, concentrations
for LNT in Chinese humanmilk were significantly higher for Se+Le+ subgroup II than subgroup I (Figure ); such a trend could also
be observed in Dutch humanmilk (Figure ), although not significantly different.
Overall, FUT2-mediated HMO structures play a key role in the differentiation
between the subgroups in both Chinese and Dutch humanmilk, indicating
that enzyme activity may be reduced for the FUT2 enzyme due to polymorphism.This study tried to fill a gap in the literature by trying to recognize
subgroups with statistics and highlight the variability in HMO composition
in Chinese humanmilk of 30 mothers over a 20-wk lactation period.
This study showed that total HMO concentrations in Chinese humanmilk
are not driven by their mother’s SeLe status, but ratios of
the total acidic and total neutral HMO fractions in humanmilk of
Chinese mothers are responsible for the clustering. On the basis of
the neutral fucosylated HMO fraction, Se+Le+ subgroups were recognized. To investigate whether the observed variability
in HMO composition is typical for only Chinese mothers, HMO profiles
of 28 Dutch mothers 4 wk postpartum were investigated, which resulted
in Se+Le+ subgroups, based on the concentrations
of the neutral fucosylated HMO fraction, although with distinctive
HMOs having a different concentration for the two subgroups.
Authors: Simone Albrecht; Henk A Schols; Ellen G H M van den Heuvel; Alphons G J Voragen; Harry Gruppen Journal: Carbohydr Res Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Michelle K McGuire; Courtney L Meehan; Mark A McGuire; Janet E Williams; James Foster; Daniel W Sellen; Elizabeth W Kamau-Mbuthia; Egidioh W Kamundia; Samwel Mbugua; Sophie E Moore; Andrew M Prentice; Linda J Kvist; Gloria E Otoo; Sarah L Brooker; William J Price; Bahman Shafii; Caitlyn Placek; Kimberly A Lackey; Bianca Robertson; Susana Manzano; Lorena Ruíz; Juan M Rodríguez; Rossina G Pareja; Lars Bode Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Andreas Cederlund; Ylva Kai-Larsen; Gordana Printz; Hiroyuki Yoshio; Gunvor Alvelius; Hugo Lagercrantz; Roger Strömberg; Hans Jörnvall; Gudmundur H Gudmundsson; Birgitta Agerberth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sean Austin; Carlos A De Castro; Norbert Sprenger; Aristea Binia; Michael Affolter; Clara L Garcia-Rodenas; Lydie Beauport; Jean-François Tolsa; Céline J Fischer Fumeaux Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Linda P Siziba; Marko Mank; Bernd Stahl; John Gonsalves; Bernadet Blijenberg; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Jon Genuneit Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 5.717