| Literature DB >> 26303932 |
Saumya Wickramasinghe1,2,3, Alline R Pacheco4,5,6, Danielle G Lemay7,8, David A Mills9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breastfed human infants are predominantly colonized by bifidobacteria that thrive on human milk oligosaccharides (HMO). Two predominant species of bifidobacteria in infant feces are Bifidobacterium breve (B. breve) and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis (B. infantis), both of which include avid HMO-consumer strains. Our laboratory has previously shown that B. infantis, when grown on HMO, increases adhesion to intestinal cells and increases the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of carbon source-glucose, lactose, or HMO-on the ability of B. breve and B. infantis to adhere to and affect the transcription of intestinal epithelial cells on a genome-wide basis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26303932 PMCID: PMC4548914 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0508-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Binding of B. breve SC95 and B. infantis ATCC 15697 to Caco-2 cell monolayers, expressed as percentage of initial bacterial input. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA, and binding percentages were compared to LAC. * P < 0.01
Summary of the RNA-Seq gene expression analysis. Numbers of genes that had significant expression changes in Caco-2 cells
| Strain | Comparison | Expression changea |
|---|---|---|
|
| GLU vs HMO | 12 genes upregulated and 61 genes downregulated by HMO |
| LAC vs HMO | 196 genes upregulated and 144 genes downregulated by HMO | |
| GLU vs LAC | 96 genes upregulated and 426 genes downregulated by LAC | |
|
| GLU vs HMO | 107 genes upregulated and 178 genes downregulated by HMO |
| LAC vs HMO | 21 genes upregulated and 37 genes downregulated by HMO | |
| GLU vs LAC | 97 genes upregulated and 48 genes downregulated by LAC |
aGenes with statistically significant changes in expression
Fig. 2Number of Caco-2 genes differentially expressed between B. infantis ATCC 15697 and B. breve SC95 in response to different substrates (GLU = glucose, LAC = lactose, HMO = human milk oligosaccharides). Venn diagram prepared using EulerAPE [62]
Enriched annotation terms with significant changes in Caco-2 cells exposed to B. breve SC95 grown on different carbon sources
| GLU vs HMO comparison: cluster annotation of genes downregulated by HMO | ||
| Enrichment score | Term1 | Gene count |
| 8.8 | GO:0008009 ~ chemokine activity | 9 |
| 4.2 | GO:0005576 ~ extracellular region | 19 |
| 3.8 | GO:0050900 ~ leukocyte migration | 5 |
| 2.9 | GO:0048514 ~ blood vessel morphogenesis | 6 |
| 2.8 | GO:0006915 ~ apoptosis | 9 |
| 2.7 | GO:0051101 ~ regulation of DNA binding | 5 |
| 2.7 | GO:0031328 ~ positive regulation cellular biosynthetic process | 10 |
| 2.3 | GO:0043066 ~ negative regulation of apoptosis | 7 |
| 2.1 | GO:0031349 ~ positive regulation of defense response | 4 |
| 1.9 | GO:0002763 ~ positive regulation myeloid leukocyte differentiation | 3 |
| HMO vs LAC comparison: cluster annotation of genes upregulated by HMO | ||
| Enrichment score | Term1 | Gene count |
| 9.5 | GO:0045449 ~ regulation of transcription | 58 |
| 4.6 | IPR015880:Zinc finger, C2H2-like | 24 |
| 2.8 | IPR012287:Homeodomain-related | 10 |
| HMO vs LAC comparison: cluster annotation of genes downregulated by HMO | ||
| Enrichment score | Term1 | Gene count |
| 6.4 | GO:0008009 ~ chemokine activity | 8 |
| 5.9 | GO:0042981 ~ regulation of apoptosis | 21 |
| 5.0 | GO:0043066 ~ negative regulation of apoptosis | 13 |
| 4.2 | GO:0031328 ~ positive regulation cellular biosynthetic process | 18 |
| 3.3 | IPR004827:Basic-leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor | 6 |
| 3.1 | GO:0051272 ~ positive regulation of cell motion | 7 |
| 3.1 | GO:0051674 ~ localization of cell | 10 |
| 2.7 | GO:0005840 ~ ribosome | 8 |
| 2.7 | GO:0051090 ~ regulation of transcription factor activity | 6 |
| 2.6 | GO:0001525 ~ angiogenesis | 7 |
| 2.4 | GO:0010557 ~ positive regulation macromolecule biosynthesis | 14 |
Term1: Annotation terms with enrichment score ≥1.3, p value (EASE score) ≤0.05 and globally corrected enrichment Benjamini p-value (to control family-wide false discovery rate) ≤0.05 were selected
Enriched annotation terms with significant changes in Caco-2 cells exposed to B. infantis ATCC 15697 grown on different carbon sources
| GLU vs HMO cluster annotation of genes downregulated by HMO | ||
| Enrichment score | Term | Gene count |
| 3.51 | IPR000558:Histone H2B | 4 |
| 3.16 | GO:0032993 ~ protein-DNA complex | 8 |
| 3.07 | GO:0003677 ~ DNA binding | 33 |
| HMO vs LAC cluster annotation of genes downregulated by HMO | ||
| Enrichment score | Term | Gene count |
| 5.68 | GO:0008009 ~ chemokine activity | 6 |
| 2.63 | GO:0005615 ~ extracellular space | 8 |
Fig. 3Heat map of inflammation related genes with significant changes in expression in Caco2 cells exposed B. infantis ATCC 15697 grown in GLU, HMO or LAC. Three replicates are shown for each sugar
Fig. 4Heat map of inflammation related genes with significant changes in expression in Caco2 cells exposed B.breve SC95 grown in GLU, HMO or LAC. Three replicates are shown for each sugar
Fig. 5Expression of CXCL1, CXCL2 and CXCL3 genes in a B. infantis ATCC 15697 grown on HMO, GLU or LAC, and b B. breve SC95 grown on HMO, GLU or LAC. Expression of these genes were significantly downregulated by HMO grown bifidobacteria
Known candidate genes for Crohn’s disease and IBD with significant changes of expression in Caco-2 cells exposed to bifidobacteria strains grown on different carbon sources
| Comparison |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| GLU vs HMO | ||
| Upregulated by HMO | LTB | None |
| TNNI2 | ||
| Downregulated by HMO | LRRK2 | FOS |
| SOCS1 | ICAM1 | |
| TNFAIP3 | ||
| TNFRSF18 | ||
| LAC vs HMO | ||
| Upregulated by HMO | None | DOK3 |
| LAT | ||
| MUC1 | ||
| RASIP1 | ||
| Downregulated by HMO | ICAM1 | FOS |
| LRRK2 | ICAM1 | |
| LTB | ||
| MAP3K8 | ||
| TNF | ||
| TNFAIP3 | ||
| TNFRSF18 |
Candidate genes for Crohn’s disease: LTB, LRRK2, ICAM1, LAT, MUC1, RASIP1, TNF
Candidate genes for Ulcerative colitis: TNNI2, SOCS1, FOS, TNFAIP3, TNFRSF18, DOK3, MUC1, MAP3K8