| Literature DB >> 27644050 |
Paula Smith-Brown1, Mark Morrison2, Lutz Krause2, Peter S W Davies1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One mechanism by which early life environment may influence long term health is through modulation of the gut microbiota. It is widely accepted that the optimal source of nutrition in early life is breast milk, with Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) thought to play an important role in nourishing the developing microbiota. However, mothers with inactive secretor genes have altered HMO composition and quantities in their breast milk. In this pilot study we examine the influence of secretor status and breast-feeding on microbiota composition at 2 to 3 years of age.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27644050 PMCID: PMC5028039 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Participant characteristics by child and mother secretor status.
| CHILD SECRETOR STATUS | MOTHER SECRETOR STATUS | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secretor | Non-secretor | Secretor | Non-secretor | |||||||
| Independent sample T test | ||||||||||
| n | Mean(S.D) | n | Mean (S.D) | p | n | Mean (S.D) | n | Mean (S.D) | p | |
| Child Age (years) | 20 | 2.77(0.24) | 8 | 2.57 (0.26) | 0.066 | 11 | 2.69 (0.28) | 6 | 2.87 (0.17) | 0.187 |
| Child BMI WHO Z Score | 20 | 0.4(0.9) | 8 | 0.39 (0.77) | 0.983 | 11 | 0.12 (0.85) | 6 | 0.25 (0.82) | 0.771 |
| Income(AUD) | 20 | 119100(41718) | 7 | 113214 (3880) | 0.747 | 11 | 131545 (4732) | 6 | 103333 (4578) | 0.693 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 18 | 24.47(3.82) | 6 | 24.63 (5.32) | 0.936 | 11 | 24.01 (3.81) | 6 | 21.56 (1.7) | 0.087 |
| % Gestational Weight Gain | 17 | 21.26(10.63) | 7 | 25.86 (14.88) | 0.4 | 10 | 22.53 (10.41) | 5 | 33.89 (13.2) | 0.09 |
| Gestation length (days) | 20 | 273.95(20.86) | 8 | 277.88 (9.935) | 0.618 | 11 | 267.73 (26.79) | 6 | 278.83 (6.91) | 0.341 |
| Birth Weight WHO Z Score | 17 | 0.4(0.97) | 7 | 0.28 (0.67) | 0.766 | 10 | -0.07 (1.06) | 5 | 0.88 (0.37) | 0.026 |
| Fisher’s Exact Test | ||||||||||
| n | % | n | % | p | n | % | n | % | p | |
| Gender (Male) | 12 | 60 | 5 | 62.5 | 1 | 6 | 54.5 | 4 | 66.7 | 1 |
| Anti-biotics last 12 mths | 11 | 55 | 5 | 62.5 | 1 | 5 | 45.5 | 4 | 66.7 | 1 |
| Delivery Mode (C Section) | 8 | 50 | 3 | 42.9 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 2 | 40 | 1 |
| Exclusively Breast Fed | 13 | 86.4 | 6 | 75 | 8 | 80 | 3 | 50 | ||
| Mixed Fed | 5 | 26.3 | 1 | 12.5 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 16.7 | ||
| Formula Fed | 1 | 5.3 | 1 | 12.5 | 0 | 2 | 33.3 | |||
| Secretor Child | 10 | 90.9 | 3 | 60 | 0.305 | |||||
Children’s characteristics by child and mother secretor status. For continuous variables sample size (n), mean, standard deviation (S.D) and independent sample T test p value are presented. For categorical variables number of samples in category (n), percentage of total sample and Fisher’s Exact test p value are presented.
Effect of secretor status on children’s unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances.
| Unweighted UniFrac | Weighted UniFrac | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size (secretor) | R2 | p | R2 | p | |
| Child Secretor Status | 28 (20 S) | 0.069 | 0.030 | 0.023 | 0.699 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status | 17 (11 S) | 0.071 | 0.256 | 0.104 | 0.111 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status—ABF | 14(10 S) | 0.111 | 0.102 | 0.116 | 0.138 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status–EBF | 11 (8 S) | 0.167 | 0.028 | 0.159 | 0.081 |
Results of Adonis analysis (total sample size (number of secretors), R2 and p value) of association of unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances with child secretor status, mother secretor status, mother secretor status—ABF (Any Breast-Feeding) subgroup, with the 2 formula-fed children excluded, and mother secretor status—EBF (Exclusively Breast-Fed) sub-group, containing only children who had been exclusively breast-fed for at least 4 months.
Effect of secretor status on Prevotella abundance.
| Median | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size(secretor) | p | pFDR | S | N-S | |
| Child Secretor Status | 28 (20 S) | < 0.001 | <0.001 | 0 | 3 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status | 17 (11 S) | < 0.001 | <0.001 | 0 | 4 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status–ABF | 14(10 S) | < 0.001 | <0.001 | 0 | 4055.5 |
| Mother’s Secretor Status–EBF | 11 (8 S) | < 0.001 | <0.001 | 0 | 8106 |
Results of DESeq2 analysis (total sample size (number of secretors), DeSeq2 calculated p value, Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p values (pFDR) and median absolute count of Prevotella) of association of Prevotella abundance by child secretor status, mother secretor status, mother secretor status—ABF (Any Breast-Feeding) subgroup, with the 2 formula-fed children excluded, and mother secretor status—EBF (Exclusively Breast-Fed) sub-group, containing only children who had been exclusively breast-fed for at least 4 months.
Fig 1KEGG Functional Pathways differentially abundant by mother’s secretor status.
Differentially abundant KEGG Functional Pathways (LDA Effect Size > 2(log10)) in children’s PICRUSt predicted metagenome by mother secretor status (NS = non-secretor mother (n = 6), S = secretor mother (n = 11)), as calculated using LEfSe.