Literature DB >> 32945088

Sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Bitan Chakraborty1, Alexandra Joshi-Imre2, Jimin Maeng3, Stuart F Cogan3.   

Abstract

We have investigated the deposition and electrochemical properties of sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes. A combination of oxygen and water vapor was used as a reactive gas mixture during DC magnetron sputtering from a ruthenium metal target. The sputtering plasma was monitored by optical emission spectroscopy to determine the reactive species present and confirm the control of plasma chemistry by reactive gas flow rates into the deposition chamber. The effect of the O2 :H2 O gas ratio on the microstructure and electrochemical properties of the ruthenium oxide were studied in detail. We employed a combination of surface characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, to understand the relationship between plasma chemistry and the microstructure of the films produced under different gas flow conditions. Electrochemical characterization included cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and voltage transient measurements, performed on planar ruthenium oxide electrodes with a geometric surface area of 1960 μm2 . At an O2 :H2 O gas flow rate ratio of 1:3, a cathodal charge-storage capacity per unit film thickness of 228.7 mC cm-2 μm-1 (median, Q1 = 134.5, Q3 = 236.6, n = 15) and a charge-injection capacity (0.6 V anodal interpulse bias) of 7.4 mC cm-2 (median, Q1 = 6.9, Q3 = 8.3, n = 15) were obtained in phosphate buffered saline. The charge-injection capacity of ruthenium oxide sputtered with water vapor in the reactive plasma is comparable with sputtered iridium oxide (SIROF) and higher than reported values for porous TiN, a commonly employed high-surface area stimulation electrode coating.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  charge injection capacity; charge storage capacity; neural stimulation and recording; ruthenium oxide; water vapor plasma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32945088      PMCID: PMC8293704          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  22 in total

1.  The effects of prolonged intracortical microstimulation on the excitability of pyramidal tract neurons in the cat.

Authors:  Douglas B McCreery; William F Agnew; Leo A Bullara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1.

Authors:  D C Bradley; P R Troyk; J A Berg; M Bak; S Cogan; R Erickson; C Kufta; M Mascaro; D McCreery; E M Schmidt; V L Towle; H Xu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Assessment of capacitor electrodes for intracortical neural stimulation.

Authors:  T L Rose; E M Kelliher; L S Robblee
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Electrodeposited iridium oxide for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  R D Meyer; S F Cogan; T H Nguyen; R D Rauh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  James D Weiland; David J Anderson; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.

Authors:  Steven R Otto; Robert V Shannon; Eric P Wilkinson; William E Hitselberger; Douglas B McCreery; Jean K Moore; Derald E Brackmann
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Ruthenium oxide based microelectrode arrays for in vitro and in vivo neural recording and stimulation.

Authors:  Rahul Atmaramani; Bitan Chakraborty; Rashed T Rihani; Joshua Usoro; Audrey Hammack; Justin Abbott; Patrick Nnoromele; Bryan J Black; Joseph J Pancrazio; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  C 1s Peak of Adventitious Carbon Aligns to the Vacuum Level: Dire Consequences for Material's Bonding Assignment by Photoelectron Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Grzegorz Greczynski; Lars Hultman
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.102

10.  Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in humans elicited by intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Michelle Armenta Salas; Luke Bashford; Spencer Kellis; Matiar Jafari; HyeongChan Jo; Daniel Kramer; Kathleen Shanfield; Kelsie Pejsa; Brian Lee; Charles Y Liu; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

1.  Parylene C as an Insulating Polymer for Implantable Neural Interfaces: Acute Electrochemical Impedance Behaviors in Saline and Pig Brain In Vitro.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Jing Zhang; Song Le; Lan Niu; Jin Tao; Jingqiu Liang; Lihua Zhang; Xiaoyang Kang
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.368

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.