Literature DB >> 34259381

Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Bitan Chakraborty1, Alexandra Joshi-Imre2, Stuart F Cogan3.   

Abstract

We have studied the charge-injection characteristics and electrochemical impedance of sputtered ruthenium oxide (RuOx ) films as electrode coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes. RuOx films were deposited by reactive DC magnetron sputtering, using a combination of water vapor and oxygen gas as reactive plasma constituents. The cathodal charge storage capacity of planar RuOx electrodes was found to be 54.6 ± 9.5 mC/cm2 (mean ± SD, n = 12), and the charge-injection capacity in a 0.2-ms cathodal current pulse was found to be 7.1 ± 0.3 mC/cm2 (mean ± SD, n = 15) at 0.6 V positive bias versus Ag|AgCl, in phosphate buffer saline at room temperature for ~250 nm thick films. In general, the RuOx films exhibited high charge-injection capacities, with or without a positive interpulse bias, comparable to sputtered iridium oxide (SIROF) coatings. The charge-injection capacity increased monotonically with film thickness from 120 to 630 nm, and reached 11.30 ± 0.34 mC/cm2 (mean ± SD, n = 5) at 0.6 V bias versus Ag|AgCl at 630 nm film thickness. In addition, RuOx films showed minimal changes in electrochemical characteristics over 1.5 billion cycles of constant current pulsing at a charge density of 408 μC/cm2 (8 nC/phase, 200 μs pulse width). The findings of low-impedance, high charge-injection capacity, and long-term pulsing stability suggest the suitability of RuOx as a comparatively inexpensive and favorable choice of electrode material for neural stimulation and recording.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  charge injection; impedance; neural stimulation and recording; reactive sputtering; ruthenium oxide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34259381      PMCID: PMC8608743          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  24 in total

1.  Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1.

Authors:  D C Bradley; P R Troyk; J A Berg; M Bak; S Cogan; R Erickson; C Kufta; M Mascaro; D McCreery; E M Schmidt; V L Towle; H Xu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Dhillon; Kenneth W Horch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  The influence of electrolyte composition on the in vitro charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Philip R Troyk; Julia Ehrlich; Christina M Gasbarro; Timothy D Plante
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sharlene N Flesher; Jennifer L Collinger; Stephen T Foldes; Jeffrey M Weiss; John E Downey; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Sliman J Bensmaia; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Robert A Gaunt
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses.

Authors:  T L Rose; L S Robblee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  In vitro electrical properties for iridium oxide versus titanium nitride stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  James D Weiland; David J Anderson; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Jimin Maeng; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Proprioceptive and cutaneous sensations in humans elicited by intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Michelle Armenta Salas; Luke Bashford; Spencer Kellis; Matiar Jafari; HyeongChan Jo; Daniel Kramer; Kathleen Shanfield; Kelsie Pejsa; Brian Lee; Charles Y Liu; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  1 in total

1.  A portable neurostimulator circuit with anodic bias enhances stimulation injection capacity.

Authors:  Alpaslan Ersöz; Insoo Kim; Martin Han
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 5.043

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.