Literature DB >> 31678740

Ruthenium oxide based microelectrode arrays for in vitro and in vivo neural recording and stimulation.

Rahul Atmaramani1, Bitan Chakraborty2, Rashed T Rihani1, Joshua Usoro1, Audrey Hammack3, Justin Abbott1, Patrick Nnoromele1, Bryan J Black1, Joseph J Pancrazio1, Stuart F Cogan4.   

Abstract

We have characterized the in vitro and in vivo extracellular neural recording and stimulation properties of ruthenium oxide (RuOx) based microelectrodes. Cytotoxicity and functional neurotoxicity assays were carried out to confirm the in vitro biocompatibility of RuOx. Material extract assays, in accordance to ISO protocol "10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices", revealed no significant effect on neuronal cell viability or the functional activity of cortical networks. In vitro microelectrode arrays (MEAs), with indium tin oxide (ITO) sites modified with sputtered iridium oxide (IrOx) and RuOx in a single array, were developed for a direct comparison of electrochemical and recording performance of RuOx to ITO and IrOx deposited microelectrode sites. The impedance of the RuOx-coated electrodes measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was notably lower than that of ITO electrodes, resulting in robust extracellular recordings from cortical networks in vitro. We found comparable signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for RuOx and IrOx, both significantly higher than the SNR for ITO. RuOx-based MEAs were also fabricated and implanted in the rat motor cortex to demonstrate manufacturability of the RuOx processing and acute recording capabilities in vivo. We observed single-unit extracellular action potentials with a SNR >22, representing a first step for neurophysiological recordings in vivo with RuOx based microelectrodes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A critical challenge in neural interface technology is the development of microelectrodes that have recording and electrical stimulation capabilities suitable for bidirectional communication between the external electronic device and the nervous system. The present study explores the feasibility and functional capabilities of ruthenium oxide microelectrodes as a neural interface. Significant improvement in electrochemical properties and neuronal recordings are reported when compared to commercially available indium tin oxide and was similar to that of iridium oxide electrodes. The data demonstrate the potential for future development of chronic neural interfaces using ruthenium oxide based microelectrodes for recording and stimulation.
Copyright © 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical networks; Iridium oxide; Multi-electrode arrays; Neuronal recording; Ruthenium oxide

Year:  2019        PMID: 31678740      PMCID: PMC7197741          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  23 in total

1.  Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex.

Authors:  P J Rousche; R A Normann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Microfabricated cylindrical multielectrodes for neural stimulation.

Authors:  Sean Snow; Stephen C Jacobsen; David L Wells; Kenneth W Horch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Gold nanostructure microelectrode arrays for in vitro recording and stimulation from neuronal networks.

Authors:  Anil Koklu; Rahul Atmaramani; Audrey Hammack; Ali Beskok; Joseph J Pancrazio; Bruce E Gnade; Bryan J Black
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses.

Authors:  T L Rose; L S Robblee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings.

Authors:  Edward W Keefer; Barry R Botterman; Mario I Romero; Andrew F Rossi; Guenter W Gross
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-06-29       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 6.  Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings.

Authors:  Marie Engelene J Obien; Kosmas Deligkaris; Torsten Bullmann; Douglas J Bakkum; Urs Frey
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Chronic Intracortical Recording and Electrochemical Stability of Thiol-ene/Acrylate Shape Memory Polymer Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Allison M Stiller; Joshua Usoro; Christopher L Frewin; Vindhya R Danda; Melanie Ecker; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Kate C Musselman; Walter Voit; Romil Modi; Joseph J Pancrazio; Bryan J Black
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Liquid Crystal Elastomer-Based Microelectrode Array for In Vitro Neuronal Recordings.

Authors:  Rashed T Rihani; Hyun Kim; Bryan J Black; Rahul Atmaramani; Mohand O Saed; Joseph J Pancrazio; Taylor H Ware
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Iridium oxide microelectrode arrays for in vitro stimulation of individual rat neurons from dissociated cultures.

Authors:  Stefan Eick; Jens Wallys; Boris Hofmann; André van Ooyen; Uwe Schnakenberg; Sven Ingebrandt; Andreas Offenhäusser
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-11-16

10.  Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Eduardo Fernández; Bradley Greger; Paul A House; Ignacio Aranda; Carlos Botella; Julio Albisua; Cristina Soto-Sánchez; Arantxa Alfaro; Richard A Normann
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2014-07-21
View more
  6 in total

1.  Sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Jimin Maeng; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 2.  Electrode Materials for Chronic Electrical Microstimulation.

Authors:  Xin Sally Zheng; Chao Tan; Elisa Castagnola; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 11.092

Review 3.  Electrophysiological Analysis of Brain Organoids: Current Approaches and Advancements.

Authors:  Austin P Passaro; Steven L Stice
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Engineering Brain Organoids: Toward Mature Neural Circuitry with an Intact Cytoarchitecture.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Jang; Seo Hyun Kim; Youmin Koh; Ki-Jun Yoon
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Copper-Ruthenium Composite as Perspective Material for Bioelectrodes: Laser-Assisted Synthesis, Biocompatibility Study, and an Impedance-Based Cellular Biosensor as Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Daniil D Stupin; Anna A Abelit; Andrey S Mereshchenko; Maxim S Panov; Mikhail N Ryazantsev
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.368

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.