Literature DB >> 15661300

Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Daniel R Merrill1, Marom Bikson, John G R Jefferys.   

Abstract

The physical basis for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue, as used by electrophysiological researchers and clinicians in functional electrical stimulation, is presented with emphasis on the fundamental mechanisms of charge injection at the electrode/tissue interface. Faradaic and non-Faradaic charge transfer mechanisms are presented and contrasted. An electrical model of the electrode/tissue interface is given. The physical basis for the origin of electrode potentials is given. Various methods of controlling charge delivery during pulsing are presented. Electrochemical reversibility is discussed. Commonly used electrode materials and stimulation protocols are reviewed in terms of stimulation efficacy and safety. Principles of stimulation of excitable tissue are reviewed with emphasis on efficacy and safety. Mechanisms of damage to tissue and the electrode are reviewed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15661300     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  428 in total

1.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation for epilepsy: experimental approaches.

Authors:  John D Rolston; Sharanya Arcot Desai; Nealen G Laxpati; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  The relative impact of microstimulation parameters on movement generation.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Safety of multi-channel stimulation implants: a single blocking capacitor per channel is not sufficient after single-fault failure.

Authors:  Antoine Nonclercq; Laurent Lonys; Anne Vanhoestenberghe; Andreas Demosthenous; Nick Donaldson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Layered nanocomposites from gold nanoparticles for neural prosthetic devices.

Authors:  Huanan Zhang; Jimmy Shih; Jian Zhu; Nicholas A Kotov
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 8.  Applications of biological pores in nanomedicine, sensing, and nanoelectronics.

Authors:  Sheereen Majd; Erik C Yusko; Yazan N Billeh; Michael X Macrae; Jerry Yang; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.