Literature DB >> 9665613

Encoding loudness by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve.

F G Zeng1, J J Galvin, C Zhang.   

Abstract

Electric charge has long been hypothesized to be the effective stimulus variable that determines loudness evoked by directly stimulating the auditory nerve. This 'equal-charge, equal-loudness' hypothesis predicts that stimulus amplitude and duration can be traded linearly to produce equal loudness. Loudness sensations from threshold to maximum loudness were measured systematically as a function of stimulus amplitude and duration in cochlear implant listeners. The measured data do not support the equal-charge, equal-loudness hypothesis: an increment in stimulus amplitude produces a significantly louder sensation than the same change in stimulus duration. Instead of the linear equal-charge model, a power-function model successfully predicts the measured data and should be used to encode loudness in electric hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665613     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  17 in total

1.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

4.  Binaural enhancement for bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirby; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Christine Etler; Sara O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation.

Authors:  Ziyan Zhu; Qing Tang; Fan-Gang Zeng; Tian Guan; Datian Ye
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

9.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17

10.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.