Literature DB >> 9348680

Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.

D W Smith1, C C Finley.   

Abstract

The interface between electrode and neural target tissue is thought to influence certain characteristics of neural and behavioral responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory system. At present, the biophysical properties of this interface are not well understood. Here the effects of biphasic phase duration and electrode configuration on psychophysical threshold in response to electrical stimulation in cats are described. Five cats were trained to respond to acoustic stimuli using food as a reward in an operant reinforcement paradigm. After training, the animals were unilaterally deafened and implanted with a multicontact intracochlear electrode array. Thresholds for single presentations of biphasic current pulses were measured as a function of phase duration and electrode arrangement. Statistical analyses of the data indicated that strength-duration function slopes between 200 and 1600 microseconds/phase were significantly different for the different electrode configurations and, overall, were unrelated to the absolute level of the strength-duration function (i.e., were independent of absolute threshold). For all subjects, the slope of this function for intermediate pulse durations was dependent on electrode configuration and most shallow for radial-bipolar configurations (-3.4 dB/doubling), was steepest for monopolar arrangements (-5.9 dB/doubling), and was intermediate for longitudinal-bipolar pairings. (-4.4 dB/doubling). Slopes for both shorter and longer phase duration stimuli were not significantly different. The underlying mechanisms for these effects may include, or be a combination of altered electrical field patterns, integrated activity across multiple fibers, and stochastic behavior of individual auditory neurons to electrical stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9348680     DOI: 10.1121/1.419636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Sensitivity to pulse phase duration in cochlear implant listeners: effects of stimulation mode.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Matthew Cadmus; Lixue Dong; Juliana Mathews
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-25

7.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay; L P Paredes; R N Leao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.

Authors:  Shuman He; Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Xiuhua Chao; William J Riggs; Ruijie Wang; Chloe Vaughan; Jianfen Luo; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.