Literature DB >> 24469861

Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Dyan Ramekers1, Huib Versnel, Stefan B Strahl, Emma M Smeets, Sjaak F L Klis, Wilko Grolman.   

Abstract

After severe hair cell loss, secondary degeneration of spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) is observed-a gradual process that spans years in humans but only takes weeks in guinea pigs. Being the target for cochlear implants (CIs), the physiological state of the SGCs is important for the effectiveness of a CI. For assessment of the nerve's state, focus has generally been on its response threshold. Our goal was to add a more detailed characterization of SGC functionality. To this end, the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was recorded in normal-hearing guinea pigs and guinea pigs that were deafened 2 or 6 weeks prior to the experiments. We evaluated changes in eCAP characteristics when the phase duration (PD) and inter-phase gap (IPG) of a biphasic current pulse were varied. We correlated the magnitude of these changes to quantified histological measures of neurodegeneration (SGC packing density and SGC size). The maximum eCAP amplitude, derived from the input-output function, decreased after deafening, and increased with both PD and IPG. The eCAP threshold did not change after deafening, and decreased with increasing PD and IPG. The dynamic range was wider for the 6-weeks-deaf animals than for the other two groups. Excitability increased with IPG (steeper slope of the input-output function and lower stimulation level at the half-maximum eCAP amplitude), but to a lesser extent for the deafened animals than for normal-hearing controls. The latency was shorter for the 6-weeks-deaf animals than for the other two groups. For several of these eCAP characteristics, the effect size of IPG correlated well with histological measures of degeneration, whereas effect size of PD did not. These correlations depend on the use of high current levels, which could limit clinical application. Nevertheless, their potential of these correlations towards assessment of the condition of the auditory nerve may be of great benefit to clinical diagnostics and prognosis in cochlear implant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24469861      PMCID: PMC3946144          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  47 in total

Review 1.  Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve.

Authors:  H Spoendlin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1975 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Post-treatment effects of local GDNF administration to the inner ears of deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Anette Fransson; Jun Maruyama; Josef M Miller; Mats Ulfendahl
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Degeneration of neural elements in the cochlea of the guinea-pig after damage to the organ of corti by ototoxic antibiotics.

Authors:  J Ylikoski; J Wersäll; B Björkroth
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1974

5.  Interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Severe cochlear damage in guinea pigs.

Authors:  B A West; R E Brummett; D L Himes
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1973-07

6.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes.

Authors:  F Rattay; P Lutter; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  J H Frijns; J J Briaire; J J Grote
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential and speech perception: a study in cochlear implant users with short electrode array.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Christine P Etler; Sara O'Brien; Lee-Suk Kim
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A computer simulation of conduction in demyelinated nerve fibres.

Authors:  Z J Koles; M Rasminsky
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Enhanced survival of spiral ganglion cells after cessation of treatment with brain-derived neurotrophic factor in deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Martijn J H Agterberg; Huib Versnel; Lotte M van Dijk; John C M J de Groot; Sjaak F L Klis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14
View more
  67 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Effects of Stimulus Polarity and Artifact Reduction Method on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sangsook Choi; Erin Glickman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; Sangsook Choi; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-31

10.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.