Literature DB >> 10320107

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.

R K Shepherd1, E Javel.   

Abstract

To investigate the generation of action potentials by electrical stimulation we studied the response of auditory nerve fibres (ANFs) to a variety of stimulus waveforms. Current pulses were presented to longitudinal bipolar scala tympani electrodes implanted in normal and deafened cochleae. Capacitively coupled monophasic current pulses evoked single ANF responses that were more sensitive to one phase (the 'excitatory' phase) than the other. Anodic pulses produced a significantly shorter mean latency compared with cathodic pulses, indicating that their site for spike initiation is located more centrally along the ANF. The fine temporal structure of ANF responses to biphasic pulses appeared similar to that evoked by monophasic pulses. An excitatory monophasic pulse evoked a significantly lower threshold than a biphasic current pulse having the same polarity and duration leading phase, i.e. the addition of a second phase leads to an increase in threshold. Increasing the temporal separation of the two phases of a biphasic pulse resulted in a moderate reduction in threshold which approached that of an excitatory monophasic pulse for interphase gaps > 100 micros. Greater threshold reductions were observed with narrower current pulses. There was a systematic reduction in threshold with increasing pulse width for biphasic current pulses, reflecting the general charge-dependent properties of ANFs for narrow pulse widths. Chopped biphasic current pulses, which uniformly delivered multiple packets of charge (2 x 30 micros, 3 x 20 micros or 6 x 10 micros) with the same polarity over a 120 micros period, followed by a similar series in the reverse polarity, demonstrated the ability of the neural membrane to integrate sub-threshold packets of charge to achieve depolarisation. Moreover, thresholds for these current pulses were approximately 1.5 dB lower than 60 micros/phase biphasic current pulses with no interphase gap. Finally, stimulation using charge-balanced triphasic and asymmetric current pulses produced systematic changes in threshold and latency consistent with the charge-dependent properties of ANFs. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms underlying the generation of action potentials using electrical stimuli. Moreover, a number of these novel stimuli may have potential clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10320107     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00011-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  66 in total

1.  The effect of waveform asymmetry on perception with epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Kathleen E Finn; V Swetha E Jeganathan; Uday Patel; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Arup Roy; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

6.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.