| Literature DB >> 32256856 |
Kirill A Fadeev1,2, Alexey S Smirnov1,2, Olga P Zhigalova1, Polina S Bazhina1, Alexey V Tumialis1,2, Kirill S Golokhvast1,3.
Abstract
The evolution of virtual reality (VR) technologies requires setting boundaries of its use. In this study, 3 female participants were experiencing VR scenarios with stressful content and their activity of the autonomic nervous system and EEG were recorded. It has been discovered that virtual reality can evoke acute stress reactions accompanied by activation of the sympathetic nervous system and a decrease in the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system. The high-stress response is accompanied by a decrease in the power of the EEG, and, on the contrary, the activation of the avoidance reaction is accompanied by an increase in the power of the EEG alpha waves. Therefore, the use of stressful VR content can cause high emotional stress to a user and restrictions should be considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256856 PMCID: PMC7091527 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5758038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurol ISSN: 0953-4180 Impact factor: 3.342
Breathing rate (breaths per minute).
| Subject | Rest | City | Flight | Roller Coaster | Cosmos | ISS1 | ISS2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.4 | 14.6 | 23 | 19.4 | 15.4 | 19.4 | 17.6 |
| 2 | 18.2 | 18.8 | 24 | 24 | — | 18.8 | 21.4 |
| 3 | 17.6 | 18.8 | 20.7 | 15.4 | 15.8 | 16.7 | 18.2 |
Figure 1Heart rate variability results of participant 1. List of scenarios: R—rest with eyes open; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; S—space; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; heart rate variability indices: VLF—very low frequency; LF—low frequency; HF—high frequency; HR—heart rate in beats per second; SP—spectral power; Corr Dim—correlation dimension.
Figure 2EEG spectral power results of participant 1. List of scenarios: EO—rest with eyes open; EC—rest with eyes closed; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; S—space; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario.
Figure 3Heart rate variability results of participant 2. List of scenarios: R—rest with eyes open; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; heart rate variability indices: VLF—very low frequency; LF—low frequency; HF—high frequency; HR—heart rate in beats per second; SP—spectral power; Corr Dim—correlation dimension.
Figure 4EEG spectral power results of participant 2. List of scenarios: EO—rest with eyes open; EC—rest with eyes closed; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; ISS1—first period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario.
Figure 5Heart rate variability results of participant 3. List of scenarios: R—rest with eyes open; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; S—space; ISS1—first period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; heart rate variability indices: VLF—very low frequency; LF—low frequency; HF—high frequency; HR—heart rate in beats per second; SP—spectral power; Corr Dim—correlation dimension.
Figure 6EEG spectral power results of participant 3. List of scenarios: EO—rest with eyes open; EC—rest with eyes closed; C—city; CF—flying above the city; RC—roller coaster; S—space; ISS1—first period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario; ISS2—second period of analysis within the International Space Station scenario.