Literature DB >> 27633216

Cybersickness without the wobble: Experimental results speak against postural instability theory.

Mark Stephen Dennison1, Michael D'Zmura2.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that postural instability is necessary for cybersickness to occur. Seated and standing subjects used a head-mounted display to view a virtual tunnel that rotated about their line of sight. We found that the offset direction of perceived vertical settings matched the direction of the tunnel's rotation, so replicating earlier findings. Increasing rotation speed caused cybersickness to increase, but had no significant impact on perceived vertical settings. Postural sway during rotation was similar to postural sway during rest. While a minority of subjects exhibited postural sway in response to the onset of tunnel rotation, the majority did not. Furthermore, cybersickness increased with rotation speed similarly for the seated and standing conditions. Finally, subjects with greater levels of cybersickness exhibited less variation in postural sway. These results lead us to conclude that the link between postural instability and cybersickness is a weak one in the present experiment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cybersickness; Perceived vertical; Postural instability; Vection; Virtual reality; Visually induced motion sickness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27633216     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  12 in total

1.  Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Benjamin Arcioni; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of virtual reality technology locomotive multi-sensory motion stimuli on a user simulator sickness and controller intuitiveness during a navigation task.

Authors:  Cassandra N Aldaba; Zahra Moussavi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Clinical predictors of cybersickness in virtual reality (VR) among highly stressed people.

Authors:  Hyewon Kim; Dong Jun Kim; Won Ho Chung; Kyung-Ah Park; James D K Kim; Dowan Kim; Kiwon Kim; Hong Jin Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Influence of bone-conducted vibration on simulator sickness in virtual reality.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Jae Moon; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of mixed reality head-mounted glasses during 90 minutes of mental and manual tasks on cognitive and physiological functions.

Authors:  Carole Cometti; Christos Païzis; Audrey Casteleira; Guillaume Pons; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Too Real to Be Virtual: Autonomic and EEG Responses to Extreme Stress Scenarios in Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Kirill A Fadeev; Alexey S Smirnov; Olga P Zhigalova; Polina S Bazhina; Alexey V Tumialis; Kirill S Golokhvast
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 7.  The Influence of Virtual Reality Head-Mounted Displays on Balance Outcomes and Training Paradigms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pooya Soltani; Renato Andrade
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2021-02-09

8.  Assessing balance through the use of a low-cost head-mounted display in older adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  Santiago J Saldana; Anthony P Marsh; W Jack Rejeski; Jack K Haberl; Peggy Wu; Scott Rosenthal; Edward H Ip
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Estimating the sensorimotor components of cybersickness.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Jessy Parokaran Varghese; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Saredakis; Ancret Szpak; Brandon Birckhead; Hannah A D Keage; Albert Rizzo; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.