Literature DB >> 32198313

Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology.

Suleman Surti1, Varsha Viswanath2, Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon2, Maurizio Conti3, Michael E Casey3, Joel S Karp2.   

Abstract

The latest digital whole-body PET scanners provide a combination of higher sensitivity and improved spatial and timing resolution. We performed a lesion detectability study on two generations of Biograph PET/CT scanners, the mCT Flow and the Vision, to study the impact of improved physical performance on clinical performance. Our hypothesis was that the improved performance of the Vision would result in improved lesion detectability, allowing shorter imaging times or, equivalently, a lower injected dose.
Methods: Data were acquired with the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Clinical Trials Network torso phantom combined with a 20-cm-diameter cylindrical phantom. Spherical lesions were emulated by acquiring sphere-in-air data and combining them with the phantom data to generate combined datasets with embedded lesions of known contrast. Two sphere sizes and uptakes were used: 9.89-mm-diameter spheres with 6:1 (lung) and 3:1 (cylinder) local activity concentration uptakes and 4.95-mm-diameter spheres with 9.6:1 (lung) and 4.5:1 (cylinder) local activity concentration uptakes. Standard image reconstruction was performed: an ordinary Poisson ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm with point-spread function and time-of-flight modeling and postreconstruction smoothing with a 5-mm gaussian filter. The Vision images were also generated without any postreconstruction smoothing. Generalized scan statistics methodology was used to estimate the area under the localized receiver-operating-characteristic curve (ALROC).
Results: The higher sensitivity and improved time-of-flight performance of the Vision leads to reduced contrast in the background noise nodule distribution. Measured lesion contrast is also higher on the Vision because of its improved spatial resolution. Hence, the ALROC is noticeably higher for the Vision than for the mCT Flow.
Conclusion: Improved overall performance of the Vision provides a factor of 4-6 reduction in imaging time (or injected dose) over the mCT Flow when using the ALROC metric for lesions at least 9.89 mm in diameter. Smaller lesions are barely detected in the mCT Flow, leading to even higher ALROC gains with the Vision. The improved spatial resolution of the Vision also leads to a higher measured contrast that is closer to the real uptake, implying improved quantification. Postreconstruction smoothing, however, reduces this improvement in measured contrast, thereby reducing the ALROC for small, high-uptake lesions.
© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LROC; digital PET; lesion detection; sensitivity; spatial and timing resolution

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32198313      PMCID: PMC9364891          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.242305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   11.082


  19 in total

1.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model.

Authors:  Lucreţiu M Popescu; Robert M Lewitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joshua Scheuermann; Georges El Fakhri; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Ruth Lim; Nathalie Abi-Hatem; Elie Moussallem; Francois Benard; David Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images.

Authors:  R G Swensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Continuous bed motion on clinical scanner: design, data correction, and reconstruction.

Authors:  V Y Panin; A M Smith; J Hu; F Kehren; M E Casey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Emission computer assisted tomography with single-photon and positron annihilation photon emitters.

Authors:  T F Budinger; S E Derenzo; G T Gullberg; W L Greenberg; R H Huesman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Automated model-based quantitative analysis of phantoms with spherical inserts in FDG PET scans.

Authors:  Ethan J Ulrich; John J Sunderland; Brian J Smith; Imran Mohiuddin; Jessica Parkhurst; Kristin A Plichta; John M Buatti; Reinhard R Beichel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of Multiclass Model Observers in PET LROC Studies.

Authors:  H C Gifford; P E Kinahan; C Lartizien; M A King
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Design Study of a Whole-Body PET Scanner with Improved Spatial and Timing Resolution.

Authors:  S Surti; Adam R Shore; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Varsha Viswanath; Michael J Geagan; Gerd Muehllehner; Austin R Pantel; Michael J Parma; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey P Schmall; Matthew E Werner; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.082

View more
  12 in total

1.  Hot spot imaging in cardiovascular diseases: an information statement from SNMMI, ASNC, and EANM.

Authors:  Brett W Sperry; Timothy M Bateman; Esma A Akin; Paco E Bravo; Wengen Chen; Vasken Dilsizian; Fabien Hyafil; Yiu Ming Khor; Robert J H Miller; Riemer H J A Slart; Piotr Slomka; Hein Verberne; Edward J Miller; Chi Liu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  A personalized deep learning denoising strategy for low-count PET images.

Authors:  Qiong Liu; Hui Liu; Niloufar Mirian; Sijin Ren; Varsha Viswanath; Joel Karp; Suleman Surti; Chi Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 3.  Advances in Preclinical PET.

Authors:  Stephen S Adler; Jurgen Seidel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.802

4.  Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images acquired with a reduced scan time duration in lymphoma patients using the digital biograph vision.

Authors:  Manuel Weber; Walter Jentzen; Regina Hofferber; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Christoph Rischpler; Lale Umutlu; Maurizio Conti; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Miriam Sraieb; David Kersting
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Ian Alberts; Christos Sachpekidis; George Prenosil; Marco Viscione; Karl Peter Bohn; Clemens Mingels; Kuangyu Shi; Ali Ashar-Oromieh; Axel Rominger
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.

Authors:  Julian M M Rogasch; Ronald Boellaard; Lucy Pike; Peter Borchmann; Peter Johnson; Jürgen Wolf; Sally F Barrington; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Intra-vagal parathyroid adenoma on digital PET/CT with 18F-fluorocholine.

Authors:  Ismini C Mainta; Marie-Laure Matthey Gié; Frédéric Triponez; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view.

Authors:  George A Prenosil; Michael Hentschel; Thilo Weitzel; Hasan Sari; Kuangyu Shi; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Axel Rominger
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-04-08

9.  Small lesion depiction and quantification accuracy of oncological 18F-FDG PET/CT with small voxel and Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Ru-Shuai Li; Run-Ze Wu; Rui Yang; Qin-Qin You; Xiao-Chen Yao; Hui-Fang Xie; Yang Lv; Yun Dong; Feng Wang; Qing-Le Meng
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 10.  Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  David Kersting; Stephan Settelmeier; Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi; Ken Herrmann; Robert Seifert; Christoph Rischpler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.