Literature DB >> 33446147

Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images acquired with a reduced scan time duration in lymphoma patients using the digital biograph vision.

Manuel Weber1,2, Walter Jentzen3,4, Regina Hofferber3,4, Ken Herrmann3,4, Wolfgang Peter Fendler3,4, Christoph Rischpler3,4, Lale Umutlu4,5, Maurizio Conti6, Pedro Fragoso Costa3,4, Miriam Sraieb3,4, David Kersting3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The superior accuracy and sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in comparison to morphological imaging alone leads to an upstaging in up to 30% of lymphoma patients. Novel digital PET/CT scanners might enable to reduce administered tracer activity or scan time duration while maintaining diagnostic performance; this might allow for a higher patient throughput or a reduced radiation exposure, respectively. In particular, the radiation exposure reduction is of interest due to the often young age and high remission rate of lymphoma patients.
METHODS: Twenty patients with (suspected) lymphoma (6 for initial staging, 12 after systemic treatment, 2 in suspicion of recurrence) sequentially underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT examinations on a digital PET/CT (Siemens Biograph Vision) with a total scan time duration of 15 min (reference acquisition protocol) and 5 min (reduced acquisition protocol) using continuous-bed-motion. Both data sets were reconstructed using either standalone time of flight (TOF) or in combination with point spread function (PSF), each with 2 and 4 iterations. Lesion detectability by blinded assessment (separately for supra- and infradiaphragmal nodal lesions and for extranodal lesions), lesion image quantification, and image noise were used as metrics to assess diagnostic performance. Additionally, Deauville Score was compared for all patients after systemic treatment.
RESULTS: All defined regions were correctly classified in the images acquired with reduced emission time, and therefore, no changes in staging were observed. Lesion quantification was acceptable, that is, mean absolute percentage deviation of maximum and peak standardized uptake values were 6.8 and 6.4% (derived from 30 lesions). A threefold reduction of scan time duration led to an increase in image noise from 7.1 to 11.0% (images reconstructed with 4 iterations) and from 4.7 to 7.2% (images reconstructed with 2 iterations). No deviations in Deauville Score were observed.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that scan time duration or administered tracer activity can be reduced threefold without compromising diagnostic performance. Especially a reduction of administered activity might allow for a lower radiation exposure and better health economics. Larger trials are warranted to confirm our results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG; Image quality; Lymphoma; PET/CT; Silicon photomultiplier

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33446147      PMCID: PMC7807699          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07723-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  20 in total

1.  Uptake in supraclavicular area fat ("USA-Fat"): description on 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Christian Cohade; Medhat Osman; Harpreet K Pannu; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality.

Authors:  Akio Nagaki; Masahisa Onoguchi; Norikazu Matsutomo
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2011-05-12

3.  Liver SULmean at FDG PET/CT: interreader agreement and impact of placement of volume of interest.

Authors:  Maya Viner; Gustavo Mercier; Frank Hao; Ashish Malladi; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Pre-medication to block [(18)F]FDG uptake in the brown adipose tissue of pediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Michael J Gelfand; Sara M O'hara; Lois A Curtwright; Joseph R Maclean
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-06-30

5.  Image quality and semi-quantitative measurements of the Siemens Biograph Vision PET/CT: Initial experiences and comparison with Siemens Biograph mCT PET/CT.

Authors:  Joyce van Sluis; Ronald Boellaard; Ananthi Somasundaram; Paul van Snick; Ronald Borra; Rudi Dierckx; Gilles Stormezand; Andor Glaudemans; Walter Noordzij
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view.

Authors:  D J Shah; R K Sachs; D J Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Test-Retest Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Andrew T Shields; Jean H Lee; Darrin W Byrd; Alena Novakova-Jiresova; Mark Muzi; Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Can the Injected Dose Be Reduced in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT While Maintaining High Image Quality for Lesion Detection?

Authors:  Isabel Rauscher; Wolfgang P Fendler; Thomas A Hope; Andrew Quon; Stephan G Nekolla; Jeremie Calais; Antonia Richter; Bernhard Haller; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang A Weber; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti; Lars Eriksson
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-05-23

10.  Initial experience with a SiPM-based PET/CT scanner: influence of acquisition time on image quality.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Lucia Baratto; Sonya Park; Negin Hatami; Shyam Srinivas; Guido Davidzon; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2018-04-18
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing lesion detection efficacy and image quality across different PET system generations to optimize the iodine-124 PET protocol for recurrent thyroid cancer.

Authors:  David Kersting; Walter Jentzen; Miriam Sraieb; Pedro Fragoso Costa; Maurizio Conti; Lale Umutlu; Gerald Antoch; Michael Nader; Ken Herrmann; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Christoph Rischpler; Manuel Weber
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 2.  Shining Damaged Hearts: Immunotherapy-Related Cardiotoxicity in the Spotlight of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  David Kersting; Stephan Settelmeier; Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi; Ken Herrmann; Robert Seifert; Christoph Rischpler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.

Authors:  Pedro Fragoso Costa; Walter Jentzen; Alissa Brahmer; Ilektra-Antonia Mavroeidi; Fadi Zarrad; Lale Umutlu; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christoph Rischpler; Ken Herrmann; Maurizio Conti; Robert Seifert; Miriam Sraieb; Manuel Weber; David Kersting
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Charline Lasnon; Adam Kesner; Craig S Levin; Irene Buvat; Andrei Iagaru; Ken Hermann; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Kevin M Bradley; Daniel R McGowan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.