What are the association patterns between handgrip strength and adverse health conditions? A topical review.

Measures of handgrip strength can be used to conveniently assess overall muscle strength capacity. Although stand-alone measures of handgrip strength provide robust health information, the clinical meaningfulness to determine prevention and treatment options for weakness remains limited because the etiology of muscle weakness remains unclear. Moreover, clinical outcomes associated with handgrip strength are wide-ranging. Therefore, disentangling how handgrip strength is associated with health conditions that are metabolically or neurologically driven may improve our understanding of the factors linked to handgrip strength. The purpose of this topical review was to highlight and summarize evidence examining the associations of handgrip strength with certain health outcomes that are metabolically and neurologically driven. From this perusal of the literature, we posit that stand-alone handgrip strength be considered an umbrella assessment of the body systems that contribute to strength capacity, and a panoptic measurement of muscle strength that is representative of overall health status, not a specific health condition. Recommendations for future strength capacity-related research are also provided.

Introduction

Overall muscle strength is conveniently assessed by measuring handgrip strength (HGS) with a handgrip dynamometer.[1] Measures of HGS are characterized by completing a maximal isometric grip force task, wherein individuals squeeze a handgrip dynamometer with maximum effort for a short duration (i.e. seconds) and then relax the contracting musculature.[2] Given the relatively low cost and ease of assessment, measures of HGS are used in clinical and epidemiological settings for determining strength capacity.[3] For example, larger population-based studies such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,[4,5] and UK Biobank have included measures of HGS in their protocols.[6] As such, information from HGS measurements have been used in the United States and globally for making several health-related inferences,[7] creating HGS percentiles,[8,9] and generating weakness cut-points.[10,11]

Decreased HGS is particularly associated with poor health.[12] Specifically, measures of HGS are included in validated criteria for determining frailty,[13] and weakness often represents the onset of the frailty phenotype.[14] Measures of HGS are also associated with more markers of frailty than age, thereby suggesting that HGS is a superior health marker of frailty relative to chronological age alone.[15] Moreover, several investigations have revealed that low HGS is associated with arguably the most impactful health outcome, premature mortality.[16-19] Although low HGS is associated with early mortality, the mechanisms connecting HGS with mortality remain relatively unknown. Many have presented a sequence of events that may help to explain the systematic pathways linking HGS with premature mortality.[7,20] Within such sequences, decreased HGS has been shown to be associated with a variety of chronic cardiometabolic (e.g. type II diabetes mellitus (diabetes)) and neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. cognitive impairment).[7] The widespread evidence that measures of HGS have in predicting future adverse health events demonstrates that HGS is a powerful biomarker of aging and “vital sign” of health.[21,22]

Muscle weakness, as measured by HGS, is associated with a wide-range of health conditions, which makes it challenging to delineate what body system processes are responsible for weakness. Zamboni et al.[23] indicated that muscle weakness is part of sarcopenia, wherein decreases in muscle endurance and increases in muscle fatigability occur primarily at the muscular system level. Others have posited that nervous system dysfunction brings structural and functional changes to skeletal muscle, subsequently contributing to weakness.[24] Manini and Clark[25] also suggest weakness is a product of age-related physiological deficits in both the muscular and nervous systems. Age-related declines to the muscular and nervous systems each factor into reductions in HGS, explaining why HGS is associated with health outcomes that are metabolically and neurologically driven.

As evidence linking low HGS to poor health status continues to accumulate, measures of HGS will become more commonplace in routine health assessments.[26] However, HGS as a stand-alone measure of strength capacity brings a large amount of uncertainty for future health risks because the measure is associated with such varying health conditions. For example, healthcare providers that utilize cut-points for identifying weakness may experience difficulty explaining what weakness is a risk factor exactly to their patients. Such challenges diminish the clinical meaningfulness of HGS and ability for healthcare providers to prescribe appropriate prevention and treatment options for weakness. Therefore, unraveling how HGS is associated with health conditions that are driven by the muscular or nervous systems will help to provide a better understanding of the risk factors for weakness, which in turn, will bolster the interpretation and significance of HGS measurements. The purposes of this topical review were to (1) highlight and summarize evidence examining the associations of HGS with certain health outcomes that tend to be metabolically and neurologically driven and (2) provide some recommendations for future research in this area.

Methods

The PubMed database was used to search for articles. PubMed was selected for this review because articles indexed in PubMed contain several peer-reviewed studies related to HGS and health. Database searches began in August 2019 and concluded in January 2020. The following MeSH and keyword search terms were executed: adult, aged, aged 80 and over, middle aged, humans, hand strength, handgrip strength, grip strength, muscle weakness, muscle strength, sarcopenia, frailty, cardiovascular diseases, blood glucose, diabetes mellitus, falls, gait, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, activities of daily living, walking, geriatrics, geriatric assessment, exercise test, prevalence, epidemiology, exercise, physical activity, preventative health. The search terms included for our review were selected based on the purposes of the review. To be considered for inclusion, articles must have been published in English language and analyzed HGS with a health condition that was pertinent to our review. Articles that were not original research and did not assess HGS were not considered.

HGS and chronic cardiometabolic morbidities

Chronic cardiometabolic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes have a large global disease burden.[27] Metabolic syndrome is a strong precursor for both cardiovascular disease and diabetes,[28] and HGS is associated with each of the components used to diagnosis metabolic syndrome. For example, in a cross-sectional study of 2677 adults aged 59–73 years, Sayer et al.[29] found that every standard deviation decrease of HGS was associated with a 0.05 standard deviation increase in fasting triglycerides (p = 0.006), 1.13 greater odds for high blood pressure (p = 0.004), 0.08 standard deviation unit increase in waist circumference (p < 0.001), 0.07 standard deviation unit increase in 2-h glucose (p = 0.001), and 0.05 standard deviation unit increase in homeostatic model assessment (p = 0.008). This investigation also found that lower HGS was associated with 1.18 greater odds (p < 0.001) for metabolic syndrome when using Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and 1.11 greater odds (p = 0.03) for metabolic syndrome when utilizing International Diabetes Federation guidelines.[29] Another cross-sectional study of adults aged at least 20 years revealed that men (n = 2472) and women (n = 2542) in the strongest HGS quartile had 0.22 (p < 0.0001) and 0.16 decreased odds (p < 0.0001) for metabolic syndrome, respectively.[30] Given decreased HGS is associated with metabolic syndrome, and that metabolic syndrome is a precursor for cardiovascular disease,[28] it is plausible that HGS is also associated with cardiovascular morbidity.

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide.[31] Identifying biomarkers that help in the prevention and treatment for cardiovascular disease may help to mitigate cardiovascular disease mortality. Leong et al.[18] revealed that every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with a 1.17 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality and 1.07 higher hazard (p = 0.002) for myocardial infarction at a median 4-year follow-up in 142,861 adults aged 35–70 years. Interestingly, this investigation also found that HGS was a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality than systolic blood pressure.[18] Celis-Morales et al.[32] found that every 5-kg lower HGS was associated with a 1.11 (p < 0.001) and 1.15 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence, and a 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 1.19 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality at 7.1-year follow-up in 217,011 men and 260,063 women, respectively. This study also revealed that men who were classified as weak had a 1.36 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence and 1.84 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality, while women who were considered weak had a 1.30 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence and 1.44 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality.[32]

A secondary data analysis of 452,931 adults from the UK Biobank found that low HGS was associated with cardiovascular disease events (hazard ratios ranged from 1.05 to 1.09) at follow-up.[33] Another longitudinal-panel study of 17,431 Americans aged at least 50 years determined that those who were weak had a 1.35 higher hazard (p < 0.05) for developing chronic heart failure compared to persons who were not weak at 4.7 ± 2.7 years of follow-up.[34] Although there appears to be an association between HGS and cardiovascular disease, measures of HGS may also help to predict other prevalent chronic morbidities such as diabetes.

Diabetes is a widespread chronic cardiometabolic disease in the United States and worldwide.[35,36] Weakness may factor into the incidence of diabetes. A 19-year longitudinal study of adults aged at least 65 years revealed men (n = 801) and women (n = 1102) who were considered weak had a 1.05 (p < 0.001) and 1.38 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for incident diabetes, respectively.[37] Another 16-year longitudinal study of 424 adults aged 46.4 ± 2.8 years determined that every 0.1 higher body weight normalized HGS was associated with a 0.81 lower hazard (p = 0.006) for incident diabetes.[38] Li et al.[39] found that every 5-kg higher HGS was associated with 0.87 decreased odds for incident diabetes in 1632 men aged at least 35 years. While HGS might be useful for predicting diabetes risk, measures of HGS may also help to determine risk for poor health outcomes in persons already living with diabetes.

A retrospective cohort study of 1282 adults aged 63.8 ± 13.9 years with diabetes demonstrated that every 1-kg increase in HGS at baseline was associated with 0.89 decreased odds (p = 0.025) for cardiovascular disease events and 0.96 decreased odds (p < 0.001) for hospitalization at 2.36 ± 0.73 years of follow-up.[40] Celis-Morales et al.[41] similarly determined that persons with diabetes who also had lower HGS were at greater risk for adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease incidence (hazard ratio: 1.98; p < 0.05), cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio: 2.88; p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.05; p < 0.05) compared to those with higher HGS.

Table 1 outlines the studies that were reviewed for the associations between HGS and chronic cardiometabolic health conditions. There is certainly existing evidence for the association of HGS and chronic cardiometabolic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Lower HGS may also be associated with multimorbidity and other chronic diseases that were not reviewed herein.[42] Likewise, measures of HGS could be used in those living with a cardiometabolic disease to determine risk for a future adverse health event. Lifestyle behaviors that are associated with cardiometabolic diseases such as sedentary behavior and an unhealthy diet are primary contributors to weakness.[43] Changing such poor lifestyle behaviors, especially earlier in life, may help to preserve the muscular system functions that contribute to weakness and cardiometabolic morbidities over the lifespan.

Table 1.

Outline of reviewed studies for the associations between handgrip strength and chronic cardiometabolic health conditions.

Article	Participants	Health condition	Key findings
Sayer et al.[29]	2677 men aged 59–73 years	Metabolic syndrome	Every standard deviation decrease of HGS was associated with a 0.05 standard deviation increase in fasting triglycerides (p = 0.006), 1.13 greater odds for high blood pressure (p = 0.004), 0.08 standard deviation unit increase in waist circumference (p < 0.001), 0.07 standard deviation unit increase in 2-h glucose (p = 0.001), and 0.05 standard deviation unit increase in homeostatic model assessment (p = 0.008). It was also found that lower HGS was associated with 1.18 greater odds (p < 0.001) for metabolic syndrome when using Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines and 1.11 greater odds (p = 0.03) for metabolic syndrome when utilizing International Diabetes Federation guidelines
Yi et al.[30]	2472 men and 2542 women aged ⩾ 20 years	Metabolic syndrome	Men (n = 2472) and women (n = 2542) in the strongest HGS quartile had 0.22 (p < 0.0001) and 0.16 decreased odds (p < 0.0001) for metabolic syndrome, respectively
Leong et al.[18]	142,861 adults aged 35–70 years	Cardiovascular disease mortality and myocardial infarction	Every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with a 1.17 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality and 1.07 higher hazard (p = 0.002) for myocardial infarction
Celis-Morales et al.[32]	217,011 men and 260,063 women aged 40–69 years	Cardiovascular disease incidence, cardiovascular disease mortality	Every 5-kg lower HGS was associated with a 1.11 (p < 0.001) and 1.15 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence, and a 1.22 (p < 0.001) and 1.19 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality in men and women, respectively. Men who were weak had a 1.36 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence and 1.84 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease mortality, while women who were weak had a 1.30 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular disease incidence and 1.44 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality
Farmer et al.[33]	452,931 adults	Cardiovascular disease events	Low HGS was associated with cardiovascular disease events (hazard ratios ranged from 1.05 to 1.09)
McGrath et al.[34]	17,431 adults aged ⩾ 50 years	Chronic heart failure	Those who were weak had a 1.35 higher hazard (p < 0.05) for developing chronic heart failure compared to persons who were not weak
McGrath et al.[37]	801 men and 1102 women aged ⩾ 65 years	Diabetes	Men and women who were considered weak had a 1.05 (p < 0.001) and 1.38 higher hazard (p < 0.001) for incident diabetes, respectively
Karvonen-Gutierrez et al.[38]	424 adults aged 46.4 ± 2.8 years	Diabetes	Every 0.1 higher body weight normalized HGS was associated with a 0.81 lower hazard (p = 0.006) for incident diabetes
Li et al.[39]	1632 men aged ⩾ 35 years	Diabetes	Every 5-kg higher HGS was associated with 0.87 decreased odds for incident diabetes
Hamasaki et al.[40]	1282 adults aged 63.8 ± 13.9 years with diabetes	Cardiovascular disease events and hospitalization	Every 1-kg increase in HGS at baseline was associated with 0.89 decreased odds (p = 0.025) for cardiovascular disease events and 0.96 decreased odds (p < 0.001) for hospitalization
Celis-Morales et al.[41]	347,130 adults aged 55.9 ± 8.1 years	Cardiovascular disease incidence, cardiovascular disease mortality, all-cause mortality	Persons with diabetes who also had low HGS were at greater risk for adverse health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease incidence (hazard ratio: 1.98; p < 0.05), cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio: 2.88; p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.05; p < 0.05) compared to those with higher HGS

HGS: handgrip strength.

Contents included in this table may have only captured findings from studies that were relevant for our review.

HGS and neural morbidities

Previous work has demonstrated that the muscle force generated during HGS assessments in older adults is around half of what would be expected if the skeletal musculature itself were fully activated because of age-related neural deficits.[44,45] This finding suggests that diminished nervous system functioning plays an important role in strength capacity and may help to explain why HGS is linked to diseases of the nervous system. For example, cognitive impairment without dementia (i.e. mild cognitive impairment) is more prevalent in the United States than dementia,[46] and the presence of a mild cognitive impairment often leads to more advanced dementias.[47] A cross-sectional study of 1366 men and 1616 women aged at least 65 years found that men and women in the highest HGS quartile had 0.38 (p < 0.001) and 0.51 decreased odds (p < 0.001) for mild cognitive impairment compared to those in the lowest HGS quartile, respectively.[48] Another cross-sectional study of 32,715 adults aged 62.0 ± 15.6 years revealed that weakness was associated with 1.41 greater odds (p < 0.05) for mild cognitive impairment.[49] Although cross-sectional study designs provide insights into the association of HGS and cognitive impairment, longitudinal study designs will help to reveal temporal inferences.

A mild cognitive impairment is a precursor for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias,[47] and strength capacity is associated with both mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.[50] A longitudinal study of 13,828 adults aged at least 50 years that were followed for 8 years determined that every 5-kg lower HGS was associated with 1.10 greater odds (p < 0.05) for any cognitive impairment, 1.18 greater odds (p < 0.05) for severe cognitive impairment, and 1.10 greater odds (p < 0.05) for poorer cognitive functioning.[51] Buchman et al.[52] revealed that each 1-pound decrease in baseline HGS was associated with a 1.5% increased risk (p < 0.05) for Alzheimer’s disease. Furthermore, Alfaro-Acha et al.[53] reported a significant time-by-HGS quartile interaction for cognitive impairment (Q1: β = −0.18 ± 0.06, p < 0.0001; Q2: β = −0.21 ± 0.06, p < 0.001; Q3: β = −0.09 ± 0.05, p > 0.05; Q4 = reference) in a 7-year prospective cohort study of 2160 Mexican Americans aged 71.9 ± 5.9 years. While an association exists between HGS and diseases of the nervous system such as cognitive impairment, HGS may also help to identify the acceleration of cognitive declines.

Decision making after disease diagnosis is critical for the health status of those living with a disease.[54] Continuing to utilize measures that detect disease progression may help evaluate treatment strategies. For example, HGS decreased in 220 older women as Alzheimer’s disease advanced from “early Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 17.4 ± 3.7 kg; p < 0.01) to “mild Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 16.9 ± 3.7 kg; p < 0.0001) to “moderate Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 15.8 ± 3.8 kg; p < 0.0001) relative to women with normal cognition (HGS: 20.1 ± 3.3 kg).[55] Likewise, a cross-sectional study of 79 adults with Parkinson’s diseases revealed that HGS was correlated with Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale scores (r = −0.36; p = 0.006) and Hoehn–Yahr scores (r = −0.37; p = 0.005).[56] Therefore, measures of HGS could be a useful indicator for disease progression for certain morbidities that are driven by reduced neural function.

Table 2 outlines the studies that were reviewed for the associations between HGS and neural health conditions. A fair amount of attention has been given to combating muscle weakness at the musculoskeletal level; however, treating weakness at the neural level may show promise for the prevention and treatment of weakness.[45] More acknowledgment should be given to the role of motor performance in muscle function and strength capacity, as HGS is also a discriminating measure of neurological functioning.[2] For example, the cortical and subcortical portions of the brain that control hand dexterity are also linked to cognitive function, suggesting that factors which represent neurological declines of non-cognitive and cognitive processes may have a shared cause.[57] Thus, nervous system deficits that contribute to muscle weakness could be identified by measures of HGS.

Table 2.

Outline of reviewed studies for the associations between handgrip strength and neural health conditions.

Article	Participants	Health condition	Key findings
Jang and Kim[48]	1366 men and 1616 women aged ⩾ 65 years	Cognitive impairment	Men and women in the highest HGS quartile had 0.38 (p < 0.001) and 0.51 decreased odds (p < 0.001) for mild cognitive impairment compared to those in the lowest HGS quartile, respectively
Vancampfort et al.[49]	32,715 adults aged 62.0 ± 15.6 years	Cognitive impairment	Weakness was associated with 1.41 greater odds (p < 0.05) for mild cognitive impairment
McGrath et al.[51]	13,828 adults aged ⩾ 50 years	Cognitive impairment	Every 5-kg lower HGS was associated with 1.10 greater odds (p < 0.05) for any cognitive impairment, 1.18 greater odds (p < 0.05) for severe cognitive impairment, and 1.10 greater odds (p < 0.05) for poorer cognitive functioning
Buchman et al.[52]	887 older adults	Alzheimer’s disease	Each 1-pound decrease in baseline HGS was associated with a 1.5% increased risk (p < 0.05) for Alzheimer’s disease
Alfaro-Acha et al.[53]	2160 adults aged 71.9 ± 5.9 years	Cognitive impairment	A significant time-by-HGS quartile interaction existed for cognitive impairment (Q1: β = −0.18 ± 0.06, p < 0.0001; Q2: β = −0.21 ± 0.06, p < 0.001; Q3: β = −0.09 ± 0.05, p > 0.05; Q4 = reference)
Ogawa et al.[55]	352 older adults	Alzheimer’s disease	In women, Alzheimer’s disease advanced from “early Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 17.4 ± 3.7 kg; p < 0.01) to “mild Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 16.9 ± 3.7 kg; p < 0.0001) to “moderate Alzheimer’s disease” (HGS: 15.8 ± 3.8 kg; p < 0.0001) relative to women with normal cognition (HGS: 20.1 ± 3.3 kg)
Roberts et al.[56]	79 adults	Parkinson’s diseases	HGS was correlated with Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale scores (r = −0.36; p = 0.006) and Hoehn–Yahr scores (r = −0.37; p = 0.005)

HGS: handgrip strength; Q: quartile.

Contents included in this table may have only captured findings from studies that were relevant for our review.

HGS and functional disability

Functional capacity is often measured by questionnaires regarding a person’s ability to complete a series of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and basic activities of daily living (BADLs).[58] IADLs require higher neuropsychological functioning and are considered necessary for independent living;[59] whereas, BADLs are more physically driven and are considered necessary for basic self-care.[60] Many working-age and older adults are living with a functional disability,[61,62] and the presence of a functional disability increases risk for further disabilities,[63] morbidities,[64] and premature mortality.[65] Given that IADLs are more neural driven and BADLs are more physically driven, it is possible that HGS is associated with functional disability.

A cross-sectional study of 947 adults aged at least 65 years revealed that every 10-kg increase in HGS was associated with 0.61 decreased odds (p < 0.05) for IADL disability.[66] Another cross-sectional investigation of 10,149 adults aged 71.8 ± 7.7 years revealed that those in the middle and high HGS tertile had 0.61 (p < 0.05) and 0.47 lower odds (p < 0.05) for an IADL disability compared to individuals in the lowest HGS tertile, respectively.[67] A longitudinal investigation of 672 Mexican Americans aged 81.7 ± 4.1 years determined that every 10-kg increase in HGS at baseline was associated with 0.95 decreased odds (p < 0.05) for losses in IADLs at 2-year follow-up.[68] When examining individual IADLs, a longitudinal study of 15,336 adults aged at least 50 years who were followed for 8 years uncovered that every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with 1.11 greater odds for an impairment in using a map, 1.07 greater odds for an impairment in preparing hot meals, 1.09 greater odds for an impairment in taking medications, 1.06 greater odds for an impairment in managing money, 1.05 greater odds for an impairment in using a telephone, and 1.10 greater odds for an impairment in shopping for groceries (all p < 0.05).[69] Impairments in IADLs often precede BADL limitations;[59] thus, HGS may also be associated with BADLs.

Al Snih et al.[70] revealed that men (n = 1050; age: 72.5 ± 6.2 years) and women (n = 1443; age: 72.3 ± 6.2 years) in the lowest HGS quartiles had a 1.90 and 2.28 higher hazard (p < 0.05) for any BADL limitation over the 7-year study period. Likewise, another longitudinal study of 2270 Mexican Americans aged at least 65 years found that those who were considered weak had a 1.25 higher hazard (p < 0.0001) for incident BADL disability compared to persons who were not weak and did not have diabetes over a 19-year study period.[71] Zhang et al.[72] examined the association between weakness and BADL disability in 6127 Chinese adults aged at least 45 years and found that those who were considered weak had 2.26 greater odds (p < 0.001) for BADL disability compared to those who were not weak. McGrath et al.[73] investigated the association between HGS and individual BADLs in 17,747 Americans aged at least 50 years during an 8-year study period and found every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with a 1.20 higher hazard for an eating limitation, 1.14 higher hazard for a walking limitation, 1.14 higher hazard for a bathing limitation, 1.09 higher hazard for a dressing limitation, 1.08 higher hazard for a transferring limitation, and 1.06 higher hazard for a toileting limitation (p < 0.05 for all).

An outline of studies that were reviewed for the associations between HGS and functional health conditions is presented in Table 3. Measures of HGS are unique in that they are associated with performance in functional tasks that are both neuropsychologically (i.e. IADL) and physically driven (i.e. BADL). Clark and Manini[74] suggest that muscular and nervous system impairments each contribute to the decreased skeletal muscle activation and force generation that characterizes muscle weakness, which subsequently leads to functional disability. IADL and BADL tasks indirectly reflect neural and muscular system functioning, which are also mechanisms for strength capacity. Therefore, decreased HGS may signify not only impairments of the muscular and neural systems that contribute to muscle weakness but also the impairments of the muscular and neural systems that factor into functional disability.

Table 3.

Outline of reviewed studies for the associations between handgrip strength and functional health conditions.

Article	Participants	Health condition	Key findings
Gopinath et al.[66]	947 adults aged ⩾ 65 years	IALD disability	Every 10-kg increase in HGS was associated with 0.61 decreased odds (p < 0.05) for IADL disability
Germain et al.[67]	10,149 adults aged 71.8 ± 7.7 years	IADL disability	Those in the middle and high HGS tertile had 0.61 (p < 0.05) and 0.47 lower odds (p < 0.05) for an IADL disability compared to individuals in the lowest HGS tertile, respectively
McGrath et al.[68]	672 adults aged 81.7 ± 4.1 years	IADL disability	Every 10-kg increase in HGS at baseline was associated with 0.95 decreased odds (p < 0.05) for losses in IADLs
McGrath et al.[69]	15,336 adults aged ⩾ 50 years	IADL disability	Every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with 1.11 greater odds for an impairment in using a map, 1.07 greater odds for an impairment in preparing hot meals, 1.09 greater odds for an impairment in taking medications, 1.06 greater odds for an impairment in managing money, 1.05 greater odds for an impairment in using a telephone, and 1.10 greater odds for an impairment in shopping for groceries (all p < 0.05)
Al Snih et al.[70]	1050 older men and 1443 older women	BADL disability	Men and women in the lowest HGS quartiles had a 1.90 and 2.28 higher hazard (p < 0.05) for any BADL limitation
McGrath et al.[71]	2270 older adults aged ⩾ 65 years	BADL disability	Those who were considered weak had a 1.25 higher hazard (p < 0.0001) for incident BADL disability compared to persons who were not weak and did not have diabetes
Zhang et al.[72]	6127 adults aged ⩾ 45 years	BADL disability	Those who were considered weak had 2.26 greater odds (p < 0.001) for BADL disability compared to those who were not weak
McGrath et al.[73]	17,747 adults aged ⩾ 50 years	BADL disability	Every 5-kg decrease in HGS was associated with a 1.20 higher hazard for an eating limitation, 1.14 higher hazard for a walking limitation, 1.14 higher hazard for a bathing limitation, 1.09 higher hazard for a dressing limitation, 1.08 higher hazard for a transferring limitation, and 1.06 higher hazard for a toileting limitation (p < 0.05 for all)

BADLs: basic activities of daily living; HGS: handgrip strength; IADLs: instrumental activities of daily living.

Contents included in this table may have only captured findings from studies that were relevant for our review.

HGS and dynamic assessments of function

The muscular and neural systems are important for physical functions that are dynamic in nature such as the timed-up-and-go, 6-min walk, gait speed, and balance tests.[75,76] Deficits in such physical functions can carry pronounced health consequences. For example, slower gait speed is strongly associated with mortality.[77] Moreover, slow gait speed is a characteristic of individuals with a chronic cardiometabolic disease such as diabetes and neural morbidities such as cognitive impairment.[78,79] HGS, which can be considered a measure of muscle function, may also be associated with dynamic, physical functions.[80]

Cross-sectional evidence from 110 women aged 67.4 ± 5.9 years indicated that HGS on the dominant (r = −0.20; p = 0.03) and non-dominant hand (r = −0.20; p = 0.03) is correlated with the timed-up-and-go test.[81] The 6-min walk test is a popular method for assessing physical functioning and fitness.[82] Martín-Ponce et al.[83] found that adults aged at least 60 years who were in the lower HGS category walked a shorter distance (84.3 ± 12.0 m) on the 6-min walk test than those in the higher HGS category (178.0 ± 14.0 m; p < 0.001). Furthermore, Zhang et al.[84] revealed that HGS was correlated with 6-min walk test distance (r = 0.221; p = 0.029) and also predicted 6-min walk distance (β = 3.162; p < 0.001) in cross-sectional study of 106 adults aged 62.0 ± 10.0 years.

HGS is an important factor for gait speed, and both HGS and gait speed are part of frailty assessments.[13] Cut-points for determining clinically relevant weakness have also been created from the association between HGS and gait speed.[10,11] Harris-Love et al.[85] demonstrated that HGS is related to gait speed (r = 0.42; p = 0.021) in a cross-sectional study of 30 men aged 62.5 ± 9.2 years. Balance is important for the prevention of falls, and Arvandi et al.[86] examined the association between HGS and fall history in 808 adults aged at least 65 years, revealing that every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with 0.97 decreased odds (p = 0.26) for falls.

Measures of HGS are associated with deficits in several physical functions. Stevens et al.[87] assessed the associations between HGS and components of the Short Physical Performance Battery in 349 men and 280 women aged 63–73 years and determined that every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with a 0.07-s decrease in the timed-up-and-go test, 0.02-s decrease in 3-m walk time, and 1% decrease in chair rises time for men (all p < 0.001). This study also found that every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with a 0.13-s decrease in the timed-up-and-go test, 0.03-s decrease in 3-m walking time, and 1% decrease in chair rises time for women (all p < 0.001).[87] Table 4 outlines studies that were reviewed for the associations between HGS and dynamic functional assessments. With HGS being associated with mobility and other dynamic measures of physical function, overlap in the muscular and neural system processes that are needed to properly complete measures of HGS and dynamic physical functioning may exist.

Table 4.

Outline of reviewed studies for the associations between handgrip strength and dynamic functional assessments.

Article	Participants	Assessment	Key findings
Alonso et al.[81]	110 women aged 67.4 ± 5.9	Timed-up-and-go	HGS on the dominant (r = −0.20; p = 0.03) and non-dominant hand (r = −0.20; p = 0.03) is correlated with the timed-up-and-go test
Martin-Ponce et al.[83]	310 adults aged ⩾ 60 years	6-min walk	Those who were in the lower HGS category walked a shorter distance (84.3 ± 12.0 m) on the 6-min walk test than those in the higher HGS category (178.0 ± 14.0 m; p < 0.001)
Zhang et al.[84]	106 adults aged 62.0 ± 10.0 years	6-min walk	HGS was correlated with 6-min walk test distance (r = 0.221; p = 0.029) and also predicted 6-min walk distance (β = 3.162; p < 0.001)
Harris-Love et al.[85]	30 adults aged 62.5 ± 9.2 years	Gait speed	HGS is correlated with gait speed (r = 0.42; p = 0.021)
Arvandi et al.[86]	808 adults aged ⩾ 65 years	Fall history	Every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with 0.97 decreased odds (p = 0.26) for falls
Stevens et al.[87]	349 men and 280 women aged 63–73 years	Short physical performance battery	Every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with a 0.07-s decrease in the timed-up-and-go test, 0.02-s decrease in 3-m walk time, and 1% decrease in chair rises time for men (all p < 0.001). Every 1-kg increase in HGS was associated with a 0.13-s decrease in the timed-up-and-go test, 0.03-s decrease in 3-m walking time, and 1% decrease in chair rises time for women (all p < 0.001)

HGS: handgrip strength.

Contents included in this table may have only captured findings from studies that were relevant for our review.

Discussion

This review presented and summarized evidence for HGS being associated with a wide-range of health conditions, thereby supporting sentiments that suggest HGS is a powerful biomarker of aging and “vital sign” of health.[21,22] Muscular strength, as often measured by HGS, is also an important part of intrinsic capacity.[88] Although decreased HGS and being considered clinically weak is a risk factor for morbidity,[18] disability,[73] and early mortality,[16] measures of maximal HGS alone may not provide enough information to determine the specific health risks from low HGS. Therefore, we recommend that measures of HGS be included in routine health assessments (especially for older adults); however, we also suggest that HGS be considered an umbrella assessment of the body system processes that contribute to strength capacity, and a panoptic measurement of muscle strength that is representative of overall health status.

While there is a strong body of evidence that shows HGS is associated with several health conditions,[7,22,26] some have posited that HGS alone cannot be assumed a proxy for overall muscle strength[89] and that other physical measures such as knee extension strength may provide additional value in assessments of strength capacity.[90] Accordingly, HGS has been included, as part, in decision algorithms for defining sarcopenia and dynapenia.[25,91] Although HGS alone provides robust health information that is feasible to measure,[92] we postulate that HGS could be an incomplete measure of overall strength capacity. The inclusion of HGS as part of decision algorithms and criteria for determining sarcopenia,[91] dynapenia,[25] and frailty[13] support that other measures should be considered for improving precision in the diagnoses of health conditions. Future research should attempt to distinguish the etiology of weakness from the muscular and neural systems, which in turn, may help in determining how weakness is a risk factor for morbidities that are metabolically or neurologically driven. This may include reevaluating HGS measures and methods, the inclusion of additional HGS measures that reflect other aspects of muscle function, and further refining decision algorithms. Avoiding physical measures that share common constructs with HGS, and that are more burdensome to participants such as maximal knee extension strength, may help to avoid overlap in assessing body system processes that contribute to weakness.[93] Furthermore, maintaining uniformity in methods for how strength capacity data (including HGS) are collected will help to develop consistencies in protocols, comparisons across studies, and simplicity for healthcare providers and their patients.

To determine the role of the muscular and neural systems within the etiology of weakness, examining potential third factors (mediators) may help to reveal new insights into the associations of strength capacity on metabolic and neural diseases. This might be especially helpful because it is challenging trying to separate the contribution of the muscular and neural systems in strength capacity. For example, previous research has revealed that a temporal, bidirectional association exists for HGS and cognitive function.[94,95] Similarly, a longitudinal, bidirectional association may exist between HGS and metabolic diseases such as diabetes.[96,97] Such findings indicate that when paralleling associations exist, losses of function in one factor could lead to losses in the other. Figure 1 provides a conceptual model for identifying third factors for paralleling associations between HGS and diseases that are metabolically or neurologically driven, while Figure 2 postulates how such mediators may influence strength capacity and health through the muscular and nervous systems. Identifying these mediating factors may help not only in distinguishing how the muscular and neural systems contribute to weakness but also in uncovering new prevention and treatment strategies for weakness.

Figure 1.

Conceptual model for identifying third factors for paralleling associations between muscle strength capacity and morbidities that are metabolically or neural driven.

Figure 2.

Conceptual model for evaluating how strength capacity and health could be influenced through the muscular and nervous systems by different categories of mediating factors.

Some limitations of this review should be acknowledged. While this topical review highlighted evidence for the association between HGS and several clinically relevant health conditions, this work is not intended to be an all-encompassing review that used systematic methods. Thus, the articles included in the narrative portion of this topical review share common limitations with other similar types of reviews.[98] Articles that did not meet our criteria for the narrative portion of this review could have been used to support relevant text and directions for future research in HGS. Nonetheless, all the included articles were germane to the overarching premise of this review, thereby allowing for a detailed description of published articles on HGS and health, and rational for future HGS research.[99]

Conclusion

This review highlighted evidence for the associations of HGS and outcomes that are metabolically and neurologically driven. There were several studies that found low HGS was associated with chronic cardiometabolic diseases, neural morbidities, functional declines, and mobility limitations. The wide-range of conditions linked to low HGS suggests that the muscular and neural systems may both factor into strength declines. Although stand-alone measures of HGS are feasible to complete and provide robust health information, the clinical meaningfulness, interpretability, and treatment options for low HGS are currently limited because the mechanistic processes that may contribute to weakness remains unclear and associated outcomes are broad. As such, we suggest that HGS as a stand-alone measure be considered an umbrella assessment of the body system processes that contribute to strength capacity, and a measurement of muscle strength that is representative of overall health status, not a specific health condition. Nevertheless, measures of HGS should be included in routine health assessments in clinical and epidemiological settings. Continuing to distinguish the etiology of lower HGS from the muscular and neural systems may provide insights into how deficiencies in these systems contribute to weakness, which subsequently can help in providing specificity in future risk, prevention, and treatment for health conditions associated with low HGS.