Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez1, Qing Peng1, Mark Peterson2, Kate Duchowny1, Bin Nan3, Sioban Harlow1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
Background: skeletal muscle is the primary site of glucose uptake, yet the impact of age-related changes in muscle strength on diabetes risk is unknown. Methods: four hundred and twenty-four participants (60% Black, 40% White) from the Michigan site of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation contributed annual grip strength measures and were followed from 1996 to 2012 to identify incident cases of diabetes. Diabetes was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, use of anti-diabetic medications or measured fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl or haemoglobin A1c > 6.5%. Results: the 16-year diabetes incidence was 37%. The average baseline weight-normalised grip strength (NGS, kg per kg body weight) was 0.41 ± 0.12 and a mean of 0.29 ± 0.14 kg of absolute grip strength was lost per year. Each 0.1 higher NGS was associated with a 19% lower hazard of incident diabetes (P = 0.006) after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, economic strain, smoking, menopause status, hormone use, physical activity and waist-hip ratio. In race/ethnic-stratified models, each 0.10 increase in NGS was associated with a 54% lower hazard of incident diabetes (P < 0.0001) among White women but the association among Black women was not statistically significant. In models without adjustment for waist-hip ratio or restricted to women <48 years of age at baseline, there was a statistically significant association between baseline NGS and incident diabetes among Black women. The rate of change in grip strength was not associated with diabetes incidence. Conclusion: the mid-life is an important risk period for diabetes onset. Improving muscle strength. during mid-life may contribute to preventing diabetes among women.
Background: skeletal muscle is the primary site of glucose uptake, yet the impact of age-related changes in muscle strength on diabetes risk is unknown. Methods: four hundred and twenty-four participants (60% Black, 40% White) from the Michigan site of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation contributed annual grip strength measures and were followed from 1996 to 2012 to identify incident cases of diabetes. Diabetes was defined as self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, use of anti-diabetic medications or measured fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dl or haemoglobin A1c > 6.5%. Results: the 16-year diabetes incidence was 37%. The average baseline weight-normalised grip strength (NGS, kg per kg body weight) was 0.41 ± 0.12 and a mean of 0.29 ± 0.14 kg of absolute grip strength was lost per year. Each 0.1 higher NGS was associated with a 19% lower hazard of incident diabetes (P = 0.006) after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, economic strain, smoking, menopause status, hormone use, physical activity and waist-hip ratio. In race/ethnic-stratified models, each 0.10 increase in NGS was associated with a 54% lower hazard of incident diabetes (P < 0.0001) among White women but the association among Black women was not statistically significant. In models without adjustment for waist-hip ratio or restricted to women <48 years of age at baseline, there was a statistically significant association between baseline NGS and incident diabetes among Black women. The rate of change in grip strength was not associated with diabetes incidence. Conclusion: the mid-life is an important risk period for diabetes onset. Improving muscle strength. during mid-life may contribute to preventing diabetes among women.
Authors: P L Wander; E J Boyko; D L Leonetti; M J McNeely; S E Kahn; W Y Fujimoto Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Mark D Peterson; Ryan McGrath; Peng Zhang; Kyriakos S Markides; Soham Al Snih; Rebeca Wong Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: S M Haffner; R D'Agostino; M F Saad; M Rewers; L Mykkänen; J Selby; G Howard; P J Savage; R F Hamman; L E Wagenknecht Journal: Diabetes Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Gail Greendale; Sybil L Crawford; Nancy E Avis; Maria M Brooks; Rebecca C Thurston; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez; L Elaine Waetjen; Karen Matthews Journal: Menopause Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 2.953