| Literature DB >> 35624963 |
Alma Delia Genis-Mendoza1, Ana Fresán2, Thelma Beatriz González-Castro3, Sherezada Pool-García4, Carlos Alfonso Tovilla-Zárate5, Rosa Giannina Castillo-Avila6, Pedro Iván Arias-Vázquez5, María Lilia López-Narváez7, Humberto Nicolini1.
Abstract
Hand grip strength has been considered as a possible marker for metabolic and psychiatric disease. To date, however, no research has focused on the association between alexithymia and hand grip strength. The objective of the present study was to investigate the correct association between hand grip strength and alexithymia. A cross-sectional study was carried out in Comalcalco, Tabasco, México. A total of 246 individuals were included. Hand grip strength was evaluated in the dominant hand using a Takei® portable digital dynamometer. Alexithymia was measured using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Two linear regression models adjusted by confounders were used to determine the association between alexithymia and hand grip strength. The rate for positive alexithymia was 39.0% (n = 94). Individuals with alexithymia showed a weaker hand grip strength than the comparison group (t = 2.4, 244 df, p = 0.01). Individuals with alexithymia had significantly reduced levels of hand grip strength (β = -0.39 ± 0.14; p = 0.006); after additional adjustment for clinical variables, decreased hand grip strength remained (β = 8.00 ± 1.86; p ≤ 0.001). Our results suggest that a decrease in hand grip strength could be associated with alexithymia. This measurement could be useful as a predictive marker for the identification of alexithymia in Mexican individuals who attend outpatient clinics.Entities:
Keywords: TAS-20; alexithymia; hand grip strength; weak hand grip strength
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624963 PMCID: PMC9138985 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050576
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.
| Demographic Characteristics | Total Sample (n = 246) |
|---|---|
| Gender (n, %) | |
| Men | 28 (11.4) |
| Women | 218 (88.6) |
| Age, years (mean, SD) [range] | 40.2 ± 13.6 [18–80] |
| Years of education, years (mean, SD) [range] | 7.9 ± 4.0 [0–19] |
| Marital status (n, %) | |
| Married | 186 (75.6) |
| Single | 40 (16.3) |
| Widow | 8 (3.3) |
| Divorced | 12 (4.9) |
| Current activity (n, %) | |
| Household related | 190 (77.2) |
| Remunerated employment | 43 (17.5) |
| Unemployed | 9 (3.7) |
| Student | 4 (1.6) |
|
| |
| Reported medical condition * (n, %) | |
| Cardiovascular | 54 (38.0) |
| Metabolic | 47 (33.1) |
| Gyneco-obstetrics | 47 (33.1) |
| Infectious | 4 (2.8) |
| Respiratory | 8 (3.3) |
| Other chronic disease | 23 (16.2) |
| Tobacco consumption—yes (n, %) | 11 (4.5) |
| Alcohol consumption—yes (n, %) | 36 (14.6) |
| Current pain—yes (n, %) | 151 (61.4) |
| Body mass index (BMI) (mean, SD) [range] | 29.3 ± 5.6 [18.5–50.2] |
* n = 142, from those who identified the medical reason for their attendance.
Association of hand grip strength and alexithymia—regression models.
| Characteristics | β Coefficient | S.E. | 95% C.I. β | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Age | −0.05 | 0.07 | −0.19–0.09 | 0.46 |
| Gender | −2.63 | 3.26 | −9.05–3.78 | 0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Age | −0.05 | 0.07 | −0.21–0.09 | 0.48 |
| Gender | −3.56 | 3.17 | −9.82–2.69 | 0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alcohol consumption | −3.47 | 2.78 | −8.95–2.00 | 0.21 |
| Tobacco consumption | −3.64 | 4.86 | −13.22–5.93 | 0.45 |
| BMI | 0.02 | 0.15 | −0.28–0.34 | 0.87 |
| Reported medical condition | −3.09 | 2.08 | −7.19–1.00 | 0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|