Kate Duchowny1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muscle weakness, as measured by handgrip strength, is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality; however, there are wide inconsistencies in the magnitude of these effects due to divergent definitions used to define muscle weakness across studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the relationship between previously defined sex- and race-specific cutpoints of clinical muscle weakness and early mortality. METHODS: Data come from the 2006-2014 Health and Retirement Study. Time-varying clinical muscle weakness, as defined by handgrip strength cutpoints, was the primary exposure. Time to death, ascertained from the National Death Index, was the outcome of interest. The association between time-varying clinical muscle weakness and early mortality across a 9-year observation period was determined using Kaplan-Meier methods and extended Cox regression. RESULTS: Out of the 8,326 individuals in the study, 1,799 deaths (21%) occurred during the observation period. Median follow-up time was 8.3 years (SD ±1.9 years). Weak individuals had a steeper decline in their survival trajectory, compared to non-weak individuals (Log-Rank test, p < .001). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors and time-varying smoking history, weak individuals were over 50% more likely to die earlier than non-weak individuals (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15, 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use muscle weakness cutpoints derived in a nationally representative sample to identify those individuals who may be at greatest risk for premature mortality. Results underscore the importance of muscle weakness, as defined by handgrip strength, as a key risk factor for premature mortality in older Americans.
BACKGROUND:Muscle weakness, as measured by handgrip strength, is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality; however, there are wide inconsistencies in the magnitude of these effects due to divergent definitions used to define muscle weakness across studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the relationship between previously defined sex- and race-specific cutpoints of clinical muscle weakness and early mortality. METHODS: Data come from the 2006-2014 Health and Retirement Study. Time-varying clinical muscle weakness, as defined by handgrip strength cutpoints, was the primary exposure. Time to death, ascertained from the National Death Index, was the outcome of interest. The association between time-varying clinical muscle weakness and early mortality across a 9-year observation period was determined using Kaplan-Meier methods and extended Cox regression. RESULTS: Out of the 8,326 individuals in the study, 1,799 deaths (21%) occurred during the observation period. Median follow-up time was 8.3 years (SD ±1.9 years). Weak individuals had a steeper decline in their survival trajectory, compared to non-weak individuals (Log-Rank test, p < .001). After adjusting for sociodemographic factors and time-varying smoking history, weak individuals were over 50% more likely to die earlier than non-weak individuals (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15, 1.47). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use muscle weakness cutpoints derived in a nationally representative sample to identify those individuals who may be at greatest risk for premature mortality. Results underscore the importance of muscle weakness, as defined by handgrip strength, as a key risk factor for premature mortality in older Americans.
Authors: V A Hughes; W R Frontera; M Wood; W J Evans; G E Dallal; R Roubenoff; M A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: T Rantanen; T Harris; S G Leveille; M Visser; D Foley; K Masaki; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anne B Newman; Varant Kupelian; Marjolein Visser; Eleanor M Simonsick; Bret H Goodpaster; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Frances A Tylavsky; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Taina Rantanen; Stefano Volpato; Luigi Ferrucci; Eino Heikkinen; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Avan Aihie Sayer; Elaine M Dennison; Holly E Syddall; Helen J Gilbody; David I W Phillips; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Carlos J Padilla; Markus E Harrigan; Hallie Harris; Jan M Schwab; Seward B Rutkove; Mark M Rich; Brian C Clark; W David Arnold Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Ryan McGrath; Brenda M Vincent; Mark D Peterson; Donald A Jurivich; Lindsey J Dahl; Kyle J Hackney; Brian C Clark Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Leatha A Clark; David W Russ; Dallin Tavoian; W David Arnold; Timothy D Law; Christopher R France; Brian C Clark Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 4.253
Authors: Sathya Karunananthan; Erica E M Moodie; Howard Bergman; Hélène Payette; Paula H Diehr; Christina Wolfson Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.163