Kate A Duchowny1, Mark D Peterson2, Philippa J Clarke3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: duchowny@umich.edu. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Muscle weakness is an important indicator of disability, chronic disease, and early mortality. Grip strength is a simple, cost-effective measure of overall muscle strength. The Foundation of the National Institutes of Health recently proposed sex-specific grip strength cut points for clinical muscle weakness. However, these criteria were established using non-nationally representative data. This study used nationally representative data on Americans aged ≥65 years to identify race- and sex-specific cut points for clinical muscle weakness and quantify prevalence among older blacks and whites by sex. METHODS: Classification and Regression Tree models were used to identify cut points based on individual-level grip strength associated with slow gait speed (<0.8 m/second) among 7,688 individuals (57% female; 8% black; mean age, 74.6 [SD=6.79] years) from the 2010/2012 Health and Retirement Study during January-April 2016. Identified cut points were then used to quantify the prevalence of weakness by race/sex subgroup. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of men (maximum grip strength <39 kg) and 47% of women (maximum grip strength <22 kg) were classified as weak. Higher cut points were identified for black men (maximum grip strength <40 kg) and women (maximum grip strength <31 kg), and the prevalence of weakness (57% and 88%, respectively) was higher compared with whites. Fifty-five percent of individuals had slow gait speed (<0.8 m/second). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of weakness was substantially higher than previous reports, underscoring the importance of using population-level data to identify individuals at greatest risk for adverse health outcomes. This is the first study to establish cut points for muscle weakness in a nationally representative sample by race and sex.
INTRODUCTION:Muscle weakness is an important indicator of disability, chronic disease, and early mortality. Grip strength is a simple, cost-effective measure of overall muscle strength. The Foundation of the National Institutes of Health recently proposed sex-specific grip strength cut points for clinical muscle weakness. However, these criteria were established using non-nationally representative data. This study used nationally representative data on Americans aged ≥65 years to identify race- and sex-specific cut points for clinical muscle weakness and quantify prevalence among older blacks and whites by sex. METHODS: Classification and Regression Tree models were used to identify cut points based on individual-level grip strength associated with slow gait speed (<0.8 m/second) among 7,688 individuals (57% female; 8% black; mean age, 74.6 [SD=6.79] years) from the 2010/2012 Health and Retirement Study during January-April 2016. Identified cut points were then used to quantify the prevalence of weakness by race/sex subgroup. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of men (maximum grip strength <39 kg) and 47% of women (maximum grip strength <22 kg) were classified as weak. Higher cut points were identified for black men (maximum grip strength <40 kg) and women (maximum grip strength <31 kg), and the prevalence of weakness (57% and 88%, respectively) was higher compared with whites. Fifty-five percent of individuals had slow gait speed (<0.8 m/second). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of weakness was substantially higher than previous reports, underscoring the importance of using population-level data to identify individuals at greatest risk for adverse health outcomes. This is the first study to establish cut points for muscle weakness in a nationally representative sample by race and sex.
Authors: Anne B Newman; Varant Kupelian; Marjolein Visser; Eleanor M Simonsick; Bret H Goodpaster; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Frances A Tylavsky; Susan M Rubin; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Gregory E Hicks; Michelle Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Ram R Miller; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack Guralnik; Fulvio Lauretani; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Mousumi Banerjee; Daniel G Muenz; Joanne T Chang; Maria Papaleontiou; Megan R Haymart Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Dawn E Alley; Michelle D Shardell; Katherine W Peters; Robert R McLean; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Anne M Kenny; Maren S Fragala; Tamara B Harris; Douglas P Kiel; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Stephanie A Studenski; Maria T Vassileva; Peggy M Cawthon Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; Todd Manini; Sheena M Patel; Anne Newman; Thomas Travison; Douglas P Kiel; Adam J Santanasto; Kristine E Ensrud; Qian-Li Xue; Michelle Shardell; Kate Duchowny; Kristine M Erlandson; Karol M Pencina; Roger A Fielding; Jay Magaziner; Timothy Kwok; Magnus Karlsson; Claes Ohlsson; Dan Mellström; Vasant Hirani; Eva Ribom; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Shalender Bhasin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ryan McGrath; Sheria G Robinson-Lane; Mark D Peterson; Ryan R Bailey; Brenda M Vincent Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Todd M Manini; Sheena M Patel; Anne B Newman; Thomas G Travison; Douglas P Kiel; Michelle D Shardell; Karol M Pencina; Kevin E Wilson; Thomas L Kelly; Joseph M Massaro; Roger A Fielding; Jay Magaziner; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Timothy C Y Kwok; Vasant Hirani; Magnus K Karlsson; Ralph B DʼAgostino; Dan Mellström; Claes Ohlsson; Eva Ribom; Joanne M Jordan; Shalender Bhasin; Peggy M Cawthon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.562