| Literature DB >> 32055737 |
Joham Surfraz Ali1, Noor Ul Ain1, Sania Naz1, Muhammad Zia1.
Abstract
Malignant cells reprogram metabolic pathways to meet the demands of growth and proliferation. These altered manners of metabolism are now identified as hallmarks of cancer. Studies have revealed tumor cells alter specific pathways such as glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis and amino acid synthesis to support their proliferation. In this review, we provide a theoretical framework to understand metabolic reprogramming and the mechanisms accompanying distorted metabolism to tumor progression. How these alterations will be assisting in cancer diagnostics and advances in standard techniques in marker identification and imagining are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemistry; Cancer; Cancer research; Cell differentiation; DOPA; Imaging; MRI; Medical imaging; Metabolic pathway; Metabolomics; Nuclear medicine; PET; SPECT
Year: 2020 PMID: 32055737 PMCID: PMC7005466 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Crabtree positive and negative effect. Crabtree effect demonstrated in yeasts cells with Crabtree-positive and negative cells. It lowers biomass production as a portion of sugar is converted into ethanol. Thus Crabtree-positive yeast cells exhibit increased glucose consumption to attain the same yield of cells in comparison to Crabtree-negative yeast. Though, ethanol acts as a device to reduce and control the proliferation of other competitive microbes.
Figure 2Elevated glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and lipogenesis within cancer cell. Increased glucose uptake powers glycolysis, but because of the inefficient utilization of glycolytic endproducts by the cancer cell, pyruvate is converted to lactate. Cancer cells take in more glutamine that feeds the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle leading to more citrate production. Citrate is transported into the cytosol mediated by citrate transport proteins (CTP). Cytosolic citrate is converted to acetyl CoA that supports lipid and cholesterol biosynthesis.
Figure 3Biomarkers associated with metabolic pathways including glucose, lipids and amino acids.
Metabolic biomarkers and their significance.
| Biomarker | Analogue | Targeted Metabolism | Cancer | Significance | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 2DG | Aerobic glycolysis | Almost all cancers | Oxidative stress, Glycosylation inhibition, Facilitates apoptosis, | False positive results due to frequent uptake by normal and inflamed cells. |
| 18F-FDG | Glycolysis | Colorectal, Lung, Head, Neck, Breast, Gall bladder, Lymphoma, | Detecting malignant lesions, FDA approved, Efficient early diagnosis, | Difficulty in detection of inflammation lesions, | |
| 18F-FLT | Thymidine kinase (DNA synthesis, cell cycle/nucleotide synthesis) | Extra cranial tumors Lung, Melanoma, Laryngeal, Soft tissue, | Better imaging contrast than FDG, Promising tracer for gliomas, | Poor spatial resolution | |
| 2-NBDG | Glucose uptake | Oral neoplasia, Malignant cells, | Submicron resolution image, Significant substitute of radiopharmaceuticals, Easy production, Easy local topical delivery, | Uptake by benign lesions and penetration depth | |
| Choline | 11C-choline | Lipid synthesis | Brain, Lungs, Colon, Esophageal, Bladder, Prostate, | Used to image breast, head and hepatocellular carcinoma, | Insufficient diagnostic accuracy in staging the disease, Allergic reaction, Radiation risk |
| 18F-choline (FCH) | Membrane lipid and protein | Brain, Prostate, | Longer half life | Less specific and sensitive than MRI | |
| Androgen receptor | 18F-FDHT | Protein synthesis, (antigen) | Prostate, Breast, | Noninvasive approach for tumor study, | reduced affectivity when administered along testosterone |
| Amino acid | C11-methionine | Amino acid transport, | Brain, Melanoma, Endometrial, Lymphoma, | Effective Monitoring tool for therapeutic effect, Identifies tumor recurrence, Differentiate b/w neoplastic and non-neoplastic origin of hemorrhage, | Binding to protein, Accumulation in pelvic bone, esophagus, pancreas, endometrium etc, |
| 18F-F-DOPA | Ambiguous mechanism but associated to Neutral amino acid transporter | Brain tumor | Monitor striatal dopamine pathway, Identify movement disorders, Longer half-life, | Confusion in its accumulation either due to dopaminergic reaction or due to tumorigenicity | |
| 18F-OMFD | Neutral amino acid transporter | Brain lesions | Similar kinetic profile as 18F-FDOPA, | Expensive due to complicated labeling procedures. | |
| 18F-L-DOPA | Catechol amines biosynthesis | Neuroendocrine, Laryngeal, Melanoma, | Effective for solid neoplasms | Expensive due to complicated labeling procedures. | |
| Glycoprotein | PAP | Basal cell layer disruption causing PSA leakage, | Prostate, | Used in prostrate cancer prognosis. Used as staining agent to determine the malignant cells being metastasized | Less sensitivity, Detection of proper stage issues, False positive results |
| AMACR | Fat metabolism | Prostate, | Growth promoter, High sensitivity and specificity, | Feasibility issues, Humoral response, | |
| Amino acid | Sarcosine | Amino acid | Prostate, | Malignancy of prostate cancer, | Still under clinical trials, |
Diagnostic techniques and their characteristics.
| Technique | Cancer | Nature of detection | Detection limit | Significance | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computed Tomography | Almost all types of cancer (Colorectal and lungs) and tumor infection especially Bone tumors (conventional method) | X-rays | 10−10- 10−11 M. | Helps in generating multiplanar reformatted imaging. | Only provide information about structural Characteristics |
| PET | Almost All cancers | Nuclear imaging (Radioisotopes) | 10−11- 10−12 M. | High sensitivity, | Expensive, Qualified staff required |
| SPECT | Colorectal, Lung, Head, Neck, Breast, | Nuclear imaging (Radioisotopes) | 10−10- 10−11 M. | Detection of biochemical and physiological anomalies | Lengthy acquisition time, inefficiency in terms of modality constrains. |
| Optical imaging | Extra cranial tumors | UV-Infra red. | 10−12 M. | Cost effective, | Surfaced penetration, |
| Magnetic resonance imaging | Brain, Head, Neck, | Radio waves. | 10−3- 10−5 M. | Robust imaging technique, | Time, Expensive. |
| Nanotechnology | Brain, Lungs, Colon, Esophageal, Bladder, Prostate | Nanoparticles | Depending among diagnostic technique incorporated | Highly sensitive, | Under trials, |