Literature DB >> 20847166

Correlation of 6-18F-fluoro-L-dopa PET uptake with proliferation and tumor grade in newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas.

Barbara J Fueger1, Johannes Czernin, Timothy Cloughesy, Daniel H Silverman, Cheri L Geist, Martin A Walter, Christiaan Schiepers, Phioanh Nghiemphu, Albert Lai, Michael E Phelps, Wei Chen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: 6-(18)F-fluoro-l-dopa ((18)F-FDOPA) measured with PET as a biomarker of amino acid uptake has been investigated in brain tumor imaging. The aims of the current study were to determine whether the degree of (18)F-FDOPA uptake in brain tumors predicted tumor grade and was associated with tumor proliferative activity in newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (40 men, 19 women; mean age ± SD, 44.4 ± 12.3 y) with newly diagnosed (n = 22) or recurrent (n = 37) gliomas underwent (18)F-FDOPA PET perioperatively. Tumor tissue was obtained by resection or biopsy in all patients. The tumor grade and Ki-67 proliferation index were obtained by standard pathology assays. Tumor (18)F-FDOPA uptake was quantified by determining various standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters (mean SUV, maximum SUV [SUVmax], mean values of voxels with top 20% SUVs, and tumor-to-normal-brain tissue ratios) that were then correlated with histopathologic grade and Ki-67 proliferation index.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine lesions in 59 patients were analyzed. (18)F-FDOPA uptake was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade tumors for newly diagnosed tumors (SUVmax, 4.22 ± 1.30 vs. 2.34 ± 1.35, P = 0.005) but not for recurrent tumors that had gone through treatment previously (SUVmax, 3.36 ± 1.26 vs. 2.67 ± 1.18, P = 0.22). An SUVmax threshold of 2.72 differentiated low-grade from high-grade tumors, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 89%, respectively, using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve, 0.86). (18)F-FDOPA PET uptake correlated significantly with Ki-67 tumor proliferation index in newly diagnosed tumors (r = 0.66, P = 0.001) but not in recurrent tumors (r = 0.14, P = 0.41).
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDOPA uptake is significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade tumors in newly diagnosed but not recurrent tumors that had been treated previously. A significant correlation between (18)F-FDOPA uptake and tumor proliferation in newly diagnosed tumors was observed, whereas this correlation was not identified for recurrent tumors. Thus, (18)F-FDOPA PET might serve as a noninvasive marker of tumor grading and might provide a useful surrogate of tumor proliferative activity in newly diagnosed gliomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20847166     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  55 in total

1.  Treatment response evaluation using 18F-FDOPA PET in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on bevacizumab therapy.

Authors:  Johannes Schwarzenberg; Johannes Czernin; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; Whitney B Pope; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Cheri Geist; Daniel H S Silverman; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Image-derived input function for brain PET studies: many challenges and few opportunities.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Kewei Chen; Jeih-San Liow; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Rate of change in maximum 18F-FDOPA PET uptake and non-enhancing tumor volume predict malignant transformation and overall survival in low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Talia C Oughourlian; Jingwen Yao; Jacob Schlossman; Catalina Raymond; Matthew Ji; Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Johannes Czernin; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  "The simplest explanation is usually the correct one" - Can Occam's razor be applied for diffuse astrocytoma and paradoxical amino acid metabolism?

Authors:  Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  (18)F-FDG PET-CT-Negative Recurrent High-Grade Anaplastic Astrocytoma Detected by (18)F-FDOPA PET-CT.

Authors:  Sellam Karunanithi; Harmandeep Singh; Punit Sharma; Deepak Kumar Gupta; Chandrasekhar Bal
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-27

9.  18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Sellam Karunanithi; Punit Sharma; Abhishek Kumar; Bangkim Chandra Khangembam; Guru Pada Bandopadhyaya; Rakesh Kumar; Deepak Kumar Gupta; Arun Malhotra; Chandrasekhar Bal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Correlation of MRI-derived apparent diffusion coefficients in newly diagnosed gliomas with [18F]-fluoro-L-dopa PET: what are we really measuring with minimum ADC?

Authors:  S Rose; M Fay; P Thomas; P Bourgeat; N Dowson; O Salvado; Y Gal; A Coulthard; S Crozier
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.