BACKGROUND: Delineation of glioma extent for surgical or radiotherapy planning is routinely based on MRI. There is increasing awareness that contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images (T1-CE) may not reflect the entire extent of disease. The amino acid tracer (18)F-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-l-phenylalanine) has a high tumor-to-background signal and high sensitivity for glioma imaging. This study compares (18)F-DOPA PET against conventional MRI for neurosurgical biopsy targeting, resection planning, and radiotherapy target volume delineation. METHODS: Conventional MR and (18)F-DOPA PET/CT images were acquired in 10 patients with suspected malignant brain tumors. One to 3 biopsy locations per patient were chosen in regions of concordant and discordant (18)F-DOPA uptake and MR contrast enhancement. Histopathology was reviewed on 23 biopsies. (18)F-DOPA PET was quantified using standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-normal hemispheric tissue (T/N) ratios. RESULTS: Pathologic review confirmed glioma in 22 of 23 biopsy specimens. Thirteen of 16 high-grade biopsy specimens were obtained from regions of elevated (18)F-DOPA uptake, while T1-CE was present in only 6 of those 16 samples. Optimal (18)F-DOPA PET thresholds corresponding to high-grade disease based on histopathology were calculated as T/N > 2.0. In every patient, (18)F-DOPA uptake regions with T/N > 2.0 extended beyond T1-CE up to a maximum of 3.5 cm. SUV was found to correlate with grade and cellularity. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-DOPA PET SUV(max) may more accurately identify regions of higher-grade/higher-density disease in patients with astrocytomas and will have utility in guiding stereotactic biopsy selection. Using SUV-based thresholds to define high-grade portions of disease may be valuable in delineating radiotherapy boost volumes.
BACKGROUND: Delineation of glioma extent for surgical or radiotherapy planning is routinely based on MRI. There is increasing awareness that contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images (T1-CE) may not reflect the entire extent of disease. The amino acid tracer (18)F-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-l-phenylalanine) has a high tumor-to-background signal and high sensitivity for glioma imaging. This study compares (18)F-DOPA PET against conventional MRI for neurosurgical biopsy targeting, resection planning, and radiotherapy target volume delineation. METHODS: Conventional MR and (18)F-DOPA PET/CT images were acquired in 10 patients with suspected malignant brain tumors. One to 3 biopsy locations per patient were chosen in regions of concordant and discordant (18)F-DOPA uptake and MR contrast enhancement. Histopathology was reviewed on 23 biopsies. (18)F-DOPA PET was quantified using standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-normal hemispheric tissue (T/N) ratios. RESULTS: Pathologic review confirmed glioma in 22 of 23 biopsy specimens. Thirteen of 16 high-grade biopsy specimens were obtained from regions of elevated (18)F-DOPA uptake, while T1-CE was present in only 6 of those 16 samples. Optimal (18)F-DOPA PET thresholds corresponding to high-grade disease based on histopathology were calculated as T/N > 2.0. In every patient, (18)F-DOPA uptake regions with T/N > 2.0 extended beyond T1-CE up to a maximum of 3.5 cm. SUV was found to correlate with grade and cellularity. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-DOPA PET SUV(max) may more accurately identify regions of higher-grade/higher-density disease in patients with astrocytomas and will have utility in guiding stereotactic biopsy selection. Using SUV-based thresholds to define high-grade portions of disease may be valuable in delineating radiotherapy boost volumes.
Authors: Anca-Ligia Grosu; Wolfgang A Weber; Eva Riedel; Branislav Jeremic; Carsten Nieder; Martina Franz; Hartmut Gumprecht; Ruprecht Jaeger; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander Becherer; Georgios Karanikas; Monica Szabó; Georg Zettinig; Susanne Asenbaum; Christine Marosi; Christine Henk; Patrick Wunderbaldinger; Thomas Czech; Wolfgang Wadsak; Kurt Kletter Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-07-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: K Miwa; J Shinoda; H Yano; A Okumura; T Iwama; T Nakashima; N Sakai Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Victor A Levin; Peter J Tonge; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Arvin C Dar; Antonio Iavarone; Patrick J Paddison; Timothy P Heffron; William F Elmquist; Jean E Lachowicz; Ted W Johnson; Forest M White; Joohee Sul; Quentin R Smith; Wang Shen; Jann N Sarkaria; Ramakrishna Samala; Patrick Y Wen; Donald A Berry; Russell C Petter Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Nathalie L Albert; Isabel Winkelmann; Bogdana Suchorska; Vera Wenter; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Erik Mille; Andrei Todica; Matthias Brendel; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Christian la Fougère Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Minjee Kim; Janice K Laramy; Gautham Gampa; Karen E Parrish; Richard Brundage; Jann N Sarkaria; William F Elmquist Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Nathalie L Albert; Michael Weller; Bogdana Suchorska; Norbert Galldiks; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Christian la Fougère; Whitney Pope; Ian Law; Javier Arbizu; Marc C Chamberlain; Michael Vogelbaum; Ben M Ellingson; Joerg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Vera C Keil; Bogdan Pintea; Gerrit H Gielen; Susanne Greschus; Rolf Fimmers; Jürgen Gieseke; Matthias Simon; Hans H Schild; Dariusch R Hadizadeh Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Chani M Becker; Rajneet K Oberoi; Stephan J McFarren; Daniel M Muldoon; Deanna H Pafundi; Jenny L Pokorny; Debra H Brinkmann; John R Ohlfest; Jann N Sarkaria; David A Largaespada; William F Elmquist Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 12.300