Literature DB >> 23620633

Role of (18)F-FDG PET-CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

P Castaldi1, L Leccisotti, F Bussu, F Miccichè, V Rufini.   

Abstract

The role of PET-CT imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma during pre-treatment staging, radiotherapy planning, treatment response assessment and post-therapy follow-up is reviewed with focus on current evidence, controversial issues and future clinical applications. In staging, the role of (18)F-FDG PET-CT is well recognized for detecting cervical nodal involvement as well as for exclusion of distant metastases and synchronous primary tumours. In the evaluation of treatment response, the high negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT performed at least 8 weeks from the end of radio-chemotherapy allows prevention of unnecessary diagnostic invasive procedures and neck dissection in many patients, with a significant impact on clinical outcome. On the other hand, in this setting, the low positive predictive value due to possible post-radiation inflammation findings requires special care before making a clinical decision. Controversial data are currently available on the role of PET imaging during the course of radio-chemotherapy. The prognostic role of (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is recently emerging, in addition to the utility of this technique in evaluation of the tumour volume for planning radiation therapy. Additionally, new PET radiopharmaceuticals could provide considerable information on specific tumour characteristics, thus overcoming the limitations of (18)F-FDG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; Carcinoma; Head and neck tumours; PET-CT; Squamous cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23620633      PMCID: PMC3631810     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  73 in total

Review 1.  Head and neck cancers.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Kie-Kian Ang; David M Brizel; Barbara A Burtness; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Renato Martins; Thomas McCaffrey; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Sandeep Samant; Giuseppe Sanguineti; David E Schuller; Jatin P Shah; Sharon Spencer; Andy Trotti; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maria Hentschel; Steffen Appold; Andreas Schreiber; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Andrij Abramyuk; Wolfgang Dörr; Joerg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Klaus Zöphel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  18F-FDG PET or PET-CT to evaluate prognosis for head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Minghuan Li; Hanxi Zhao; Xindong Sun; Zheng Fu; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Comparison of FLT-PET and FDG-PET for visualization of head and neck squamous cell cancers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hoshikawa; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Takehito Kishino; Yuka Yamamoto; Reiji Haba; Nozomu Mori
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Characterization of positron emission tomography hypoxia tracer uptake and tissue oxygenation via electrochemical modeling.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Albert J van der Kogel; Marianne Nordsmark; Søren M Bentzen; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Reduction of [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole uptake after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomohiko Yamane; Masahiro Kikuchi; Shogo Shinohara; Michio Senda
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Molecular imaging in radiotherapy planning for head and neck tumors.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Arturo Chiti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area.

Authors:  Andreas Boss; Lars Stegger; Sotirios Bisdas; Armin Kolb; Nina Schwenzer; Markus Pfister; Claus D Claussen; Bernd J Pichler; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor.

Authors:  Kyle E Rusthoven; Mary Koshy; Arnold C Paulino
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Can FDG PET predict radiation treatment outcome in head and neck cancer? Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Dominic A X Schinagl; Paul N Span; Wim J Oyen; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  The sweet spot: FDG and other 2-carbon glucose analogs for multi-modal metabolic imaging of tumor metabolism.

Authors:  Benjamin L Cox; Thomas R Mackie; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Oncologic significance of unexpected osseous foci on FDG-PET without correlative CT abnormalities.

Authors:  Edgar Zamora; Ana Y Valdivia
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.668

4.  A Scoring System for Prediction of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  M S Chung; Y J Choi; S O Kim; Y S Lee; J Y Hong; J H Lee; J H Baek
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  A head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/MR in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Chunxia Qin; Fang Liu; Jing Huang; Weiwei Ruan; Qingyao Liu; Yongkang Gai; Fan Hu; Dawei Jiang; Yu Hu; Kunyu Yang; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  [PET-CT in head and neck cancer].

Authors:  T Send; B Kreppel; F C Gaertner; R A Bundschuh; H Strunk; F Bootz; M Essler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Head-to-Head Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT for Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Simone Wegen; Lutz van Heek; Philipp Linde; Karina Claus; Dennis Akuamoa-Boateng; Christian Baues; Shachi Jenny Sharma; Klaus Schomäcker; Thomas Fischer; Katrin Sabine Roth; Jens Peter Klußmann; Simone Marnitz; Alexander Drzezga; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  PET/MRI and PET/CT in follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Marcelo A Queiroz; Martin Hüllner; Felix Kuhn; Gerhardt Huber; Christian Meerwein; Spyros Kollias; Gustav von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Association of Fludeoxyglucose F 18-Labeled Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography With the Detection of Oropharyngeal Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Shanmugappiriya Sivarajah; Andre Isaac; Tim Cooper; Han Zhang; Lakshmi Puttagunta; Jonathan Abele; Vincent Biron; Jeffery Harris; Hadi Seikaly; Daniel A O' Connell
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

10.  Application of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the prognostic factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positron emission tomography, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement and combined model.

Authors:  Haodan Dang; Yu Chen; Zhuhua Zhang; Xiaohua Shi; Xingming Chen; Xiaoli Zhu; Bo Hou; Haiqun Xing; Huadan Xue; Zhengyu Jin
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.