Literature DB >> 15937304

Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.

Wei Chen1, Timothy Cloughesy, Nirav Kamdar, Nagichettiar Satyamurthy, Marvin Bergsneider, Linda Liau, Paul Mischel, Johannes Czernin, Michael E Phelps, Daniel H S Silverman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: 3'-Deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) is a recently developed PET tracer to image tumor cell proliferation. We characterized (18)F-FLT PET of brain gliomas and compared (18)F-FLT with (18)F-FDG PET in side-by-side studies of the same patients.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated glioma underwent PET with (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG on consecutive days. Three stable patients in long-term remission were included as negative control subjects. Tracer kinetics in normal brain and tumor were measured. Uptake of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG was quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio. The accuracy of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas was compared. More than half of the patients underwent resection after the PET study and correlations between PET uptake and the Ki-67 proliferation index were examined. Patients were monitored for a mean of 15.4 mo (range, 12-20 mo). The predictive power of PET for tumor progression and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics.
RESULTS: (18)F-FLT uptake in tumors was rapid, peaking at 5-10 min after injection and remaining stable up to 75 min. Hence, a 30-min scan beginning at 5 min after injection was sufficient for imaging. (18)F-FLT visualized all high-grade (grade III or IV) tumors. Grade II tumor did not show appreciable (18)F-FLT uptake and neither did the stable lesions. The absolute uptake of (18)F-FLT was low (maximum-pixel SUV [SUV(max)], 1.33) but image contrast was better than with (18)F-FDG (T/N ratio, 3.85 vs. 1.49). (18)F-FDG PET studies were negative in 5 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who subsequently suffered tumor progression within 1-3 mo. (18)F-FLT SUV(max) correlated more strongly with Ki-67 index (r = 0.84; P < 0.0001) than (18)F-FDG SUV(max) (r = 0.51; P = 0.07). (18)F-FLT uptake also had more significant predictive power with respect to tumor progression and survival (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Thirty-minute (18)F-FLT PET 5 min after injection was more sensitive than (18)F-FDG to image recurrent high-grade tumors, correlated better with Ki-67 values, and was a more powerful predictor of tumor progression and survival. Thus, (18)F-FLT appears to be a promising tracer as a surrogate marker of proliferation in high-grade gliomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  155 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of pre-treatment 18-FDG-PET in high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Cécile Colavolpe; Philippe Metellus; Julien Mancini; Maryline Barrie; Céline Béquet-Boucard; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Olivier Mundler; Olivier Chinot; Eric Guedj
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  The development, past achievements, and future directions of brain PET.

Authors:  Terry Jones; Eugenii A Rabiner
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-3'-deoxy-3'fluorothymidine (FLT) as a predictor of outcome in patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby; Robert J Myerson; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Changqing Ma; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michelle M Kim; Abhijit Parolia; Mark P Dunphy; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Invited review--neuroimaging response assessment criteria for brain tumors in veterinary patients.

Authors:  John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 8.  Treating recurrent glioblastoma: an update.

Authors:  Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2015

9.  (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin brain SPECT in the assessment of meningiomas-correlation with histological grade and proliferation index.

Authors:  Andreas D Fotopoulos; George A Alexiou; Ann Goussia; Athanasios Papadopoulos; Athanasios P Kyritsis; Konstantinos S Polyzoidis; Spyridon Voulgaris; Spyridon Tsiouris
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Evaluation of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) kinetics correlated with thymidine kinase-1 expression and cell proliferation in newly diagnosed gliomas.

Authors:  Aya Shinomiya; Nobuyuki Kawai; Masaki Okada; Keisuke Miyake; Takehiro Nakamura; Yoshio Kushida; Reiji Haba; Nobuyuki Kudomi; Yuka Yamamoto; Masaaki Tokuda; Takashi Tamiya
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.