OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of using a universal abdominal acquisition protocol on a photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) system and to compare its performance to that of single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) CT using energy-integrating detectors (EIDs). METHODS: Iodine inserts of various concentrations and sizes were embedded into different sizes of adult abdominal phantoms. Phantoms were scanned on a research PCD-CT and a clinical EID-CT with SE and DE modes. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were generated from PCD-CT and DE mode of EID-CT. For each image type and phantom size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured for each iodine insert and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for iodine detectability was calculated using a channelized Hotelling observer. The optimal energy (in kiloelectrovolt) of VMIs was determined separately as the one with highest CNR and the one with the highest AUC. The PCD-CT VMIs at the optimal energy were then compared with DE VMIs and SE images in terms of CNR and AUC. RESULTS: Virtual monoenergetic image at 50 keV had both the highest CNR and highest AUC for PCD-CT and DECT. For 1.0 mg I/mL iodine and 35 cm phantom, the CNRs of 50 keV VMIs from PCD-CT (2.01 ± 0.67) and DE (1.96 ± 0.52) were significantly higher (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) than SE images (1.11 ± 0.35). The AUC of PCD-CT (0.98 ± 0.01) was comparable to SE (0.98 ± 0.01), and both were slightly lower than DE (0.99 ± 0.01, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A similar trend was observed for other phantom sizes and iodine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual monoenergetic images at a fixed energy from a universal acquisition protocol on PCD-CT demonstrated higher iodine CNR and comparable iodine detectability than SECT images, and similar performance compared with DE VMIs.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of using a universal abdominal acquisition protocol on a photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) system and to compare its performance to that of single-energy (SE) and dual-energy (DE) CT using energy-integrating detectors (EIDs). METHODS: Iodine inserts of various concentrations and sizes were embedded into different sizes of adult abdominal phantoms. Phantoms were scanned on a research PCD-CT and a clinical EID-CT with SE and DE modes. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) were generated from PCD-CT and DE mode of EID-CT. For each image type and phantom size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured for each iodine insert and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for iodine detectability was calculated using a channelized Hotelling observer. The optimal energy (in kiloelectrovolt) of VMIs was determined separately as the one with highest CNR and the one with the highest AUC. The PCD-CT VMIs at the optimal energy were then compared with DE VMIs and SE images in terms of CNR and AUC. RESULTS: Virtual monoenergetic image at 50 keV had both the highest CNR and highest AUC for PCD-CT and DECT. For 1.0 mg I/mL iodine and 35 cm phantom, the CNRs of 50 keV VMIs from PCD-CT (2.01 ± 0.67) and DE (1.96 ± 0.52) were significantly higher (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) than SE images (1.11 ± 0.35). The AUC of PCD-CT (0.98 ± 0.01) was comparable to SE (0.98 ± 0.01), and both were slightly lower than DE (0.99 ± 0.01, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A similar trend was observed for other phantom sizes and iodine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual monoenergetic images at a fixed energy from a universal acquisition protocol on PCD-CT demonstrated higher iodine CNR and comparable iodine detectability than SECT images, and similar performance compared with DE VMIs.
Authors: Lifeng Yu; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Jia Wang; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Wei Zhou; Dilbar Abdurakhimova; Michael Bruesewitz; Ahmed Halaweish; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2018-03
Authors: David M Hough; Joel G Fletcher; Katharine L Grant; Jeff L Fidler; Lifeng Yu; Jennifer R Geske; Rickey E Carter; Rainer Raupach; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Zhicong Yu; Shuai Leng; Steven M Jorgensen; Zhoubo Li; Ralf Gutjahr; Baiyu Chen; Ahmed F Halaweish; Steffen Kappler; Lifeng Yu; Erik L Ritman; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Thomas Sartoretti; Damien Racine; Victor Mergen; Lisa Jungblut; Pascal Monnin; Thomas G Flohr; Katharina Martini; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi; André Euler Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-02-18
Authors: Victor Mergen; Thomas Sartoretti; Ernst Klotz; Bernhard Schmidt; Lisa Jungblut; Kai Higashigaito; Robert Manka; André Euler; Markus Kasel; Matthias Eberhard; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 10.065