Literature DB >> 22149820

Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality.

Lifeng Yu1, Jodie A Christner, Shuai Leng, Jia Wang, Joel G Fletcher, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality of virtual monochromatic images synthesized from dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in comparison with conventional polychromatic single-energy CT for the same radiation dose.
METHODS: In dual-energy CT, besides the material-specific information, one may also synthesize monochromatic images at different energies, which can be used for routine diagnosis similar to conventional polychromatic single-energy images. In this work, the authors assessed whether virtual monochromatic images generated from dual-source CT scanners had an image quality similar to that of polychromatic single-energy images for the same radiation dose. First, the authors provided a theoretical analysis of the optimal monochromatic energy for either the minimum noise level or the highest iodine contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for a given patient size and dose partitioning between the low- and high-energy scans. Second, the authors performed an experimental study on a dual-source CT scanner to evaluate the noise and iodine CNR in monochromatic images. A thoracic phantom with three sizes of attenuating rings was used to represent four adult sizes. For each phantom size, three dose partitionings between the low-energy (80 kV) and the high-energy (140 kV) scans were used in the dual-energy scan. Monochromatic images at eight energies (40 to 110 keV) were generated for each scan. Phantoms were also scanned at each of the four polychromatic single energy (80, 100, 120, and 140 kV) with the same radiation dose.
RESULTS: The optimal virtual monochromatic energy depends on several factors: phantom size, partitioning of the radiation dose between low- and high-energy scans, and the image quality metrics to be optimized. With the increase of phantom size, the optimal monochromatic energy increased. With the increased percentage of radiation dose on the low energy scan, the optimal monochromatic energy decreased. When maximizing the iodine CNR in monochromatic images, the optimal energy was lower than that when minimizing noise level. When the total radiation dose was equally distributed between low and high energy in dual-energy scans, for minimum noise, the optimal energies were 68, 71, 74, and 77 keV for small, medium, large, and extra-large (xlarge) phantoms, respectively; for maximum iodine CNR, the optimal energies were 66, 68, 70, 72 keV. With the optimal monochromatic energy, the noise level was similar to and the CNR was better than that in a single-energy scan at 120 kV for the same radiation dose. Compared to an 80 kV scan, however, the iodine CNR in monochromatic images was lower for the small, medium, and large phantoms.
CONCLUSIONS: In dual-source dual-energy CT, optimal virtual monochromatic energy depends on patient size, dose partitioning, and the image quality metric optimized. With the optimal monochromatic energy, the noise level was similar to and the iodine CNR was better than that in 120 kV images for the same radiation dose. Compared to single-energy 80 kV images, the iodine CNR in virtual monochromatic images was lower for small to large phantom sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22149820      PMCID: PMC3230639          DOI: 10.1118/1.3658568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

1.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach.

Authors:  John M Boone; Estella M Geraghty; J Anthony Seibert; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.

Authors:  Marilyn J Siegel; Bernhard Schmidt; David Bradley; Christoph Suess; Charles Hildebolt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study.

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Kazuo Awai; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Kiyotaka Kakei; Nozomu Nagasue; Masamichi Shimamura; Natsuko Sato; Shamima Sultana; Shoji Morishita; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Accuracies of the synthesized monochromatic CT numbers and effective atomic numbers obtained with a rapid kVp switching dual energy CT scanner.

Authors:  Mitchell M Goodsitt; Emmanuel G Christodoulou; Sandra C Larson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. I. Phantom studies.

Authors:  W A Kalender; W H Perman; J R Vetter; E Klotz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography.

Authors:  L A Lehmann; R E Alvarez; A Macovski; W R Brody; N J Pelc; S J Riederer; A L Hall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Noise considerations in dual energy CT scanning.

Authors:  F Kelcz; P M Joseph; S K Hilal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Andrew N Primak; Joel G Fletcher; Terri J Vrtiska; Oleksandr P Dzyubak; John C Lieske; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Markus Bader; Michael Staehler; Nicolas Haseke; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian G Stief; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  70 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant Vasudeo Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Value of dual-energy CT angiography in patients with treated intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Iulia Mocanu; Morgane Van Wettere; Julie Absil; Michaël Bruneau; Boris Lubicz; Niloufar Sadeghi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-05

Review 4.  Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications.

Authors:  Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Can virtual monochromatic images from dual-energy CT replace low-kVp images for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT in small- and medium-sized patients?

Authors:  Peijie Lv; Zhigang Zhou; Jie Liu; Yaru Chai; Huiping Zhao; Hua Guo; Daniele Marin; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Spectral performance of a whole-body research photon counting detector CT: quantitative accuracy in derived image sets.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Wei Zhou; Zhicong Yu; Ahmed Halaweish; Bernhard Krauss; Bernhard Schmidt; Lifeng Yu; Steffen Kappler; Cynthia McCollough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Determination of Optimal Image Type and Lowest Detectable Concentration for Iodine Detection on a Photon Counting Detector-Based Multi-Energy CT System.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Rachel Schornak; Gregory Michalak; Jayse Weaver; Dilbar Abdurakhimova; Andrea Ferrero; Kenneth A Fetterly; Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03

8.  Optimization of computed tomography (CT) arthrography of hip for the visualization of cartilage: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Pierre-Philippe Leyder; Adelin Albert; Françoise Malchair; Carole Maréchal; Laura Scarciolla; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Victoria Alvarez Miezentseva; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Changes in measured size of atherosclerotic plaque calcifications in dual-energy CT of ex vivo carotid endarterectomy specimens: effect of monochromatic keV image reconstructions.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Lee M Mitsumori; Marina Ferguson; Dongxiang Xu; Baocheng Chu; Kelley R Branch; William P Shuman; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Added value of a single-energy projection-based metal-artifact reduction algorithm for the computed tomography evaluation of oral cavity cancers.

Authors:  Kenichiro Hirata; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Masafumi Kidoh; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Morikatsu Yoshida; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.