Literature DB >> 21060140

Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing.

Ying-Yee Kong1, Ala Mullangi, Jeremy Marozeau, Michael Epstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate musical timbre perception in cochlear-implant (CI) listeners using a multidimensional scaling technique to derive a timbre space. Methods Sixteen stimuli that synthesized western musical instruments were used (McAdams, Winsberg, Donnadieu, De Soete, & Krimphoff, 1995). Eight CI listeners and 15 normal-hearing (NH) listeners participated. Each listener made judgments of dissimilarity between stimulus pairs. Acoustical analyses that characterized the temporal and spectral characteristics of each stimulus were performed to examine the psychophysical nature of each perceptual dimension.
RESULTS: For NH listeners, the timbre space was best represented in three dimensions, one correlated with the temporal envelope (log-attack time) of the stimuli, one correlated with the spectral envelope (spectral centroid), and one correlated with the spectral fine structure (spectral irregularity) of the stimuli. The timbre space from CI listeners, however, was best represented by two dimensions, one correlated with temporal envelope features and the other weakly correlated with spectral envelope features of the stimuli.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporal envelope was a dominant cue for timbre perception in CI listeners. Compared to NH listeners, CI listeners showed reduced reliance on both spectral envelope and spectral fine structure cues for timbre perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21060140      PMCID: PMC3107380          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0196)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  23 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Alain de Cheveigné; Stephen McAdams; Suzanne Winsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones.

Authors:  Anne Caclin; Stephen McAdams; Bennett K Smith; Suzanne Winsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

5.  Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  K Gfeller; J F Knutson; G Woodworth; S Witt; B DeBus
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Interaction Between Pitch and Timbre Perception in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Samara Soslowsky; Kathryn R Pulling
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Naomi B H Croghan; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Neural coding of sound envelope structure in songbirds.

Authors:  Santiago Boari; Ana Amador
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

6.  Reliability measure of a clinical test: Appreciation of Music in Cochlear Implantees (AMICI).

Authors:  Min-Yu Cheng; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Valeriy Shafiro; Stanley Sheft; Dean Mancuso
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables.

Authors:  A Parbery-Clark; A Tierney; D L Strait; N Kraus
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Mullangi; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dichotic Listening Can Improve Perceived Clarity of Music in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicolas Vannson; Hamish Innes-Brown; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.