Literature DB >> 21116672

Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Olivier Macherey1, John M Deeks, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

A series of experiments investigated the effects of asymmetric current waveforms on the perception of place and temporal pitch cues. The asymmetric waveforms were trains of pseudomonophasic (PS) pulses consisting of a short, high-amplitude phase followed by a longer (and lower amplitude) opposite-polarity phase. When such pulses were presented in a narrow bipolar ("BP+1") mode and with the first phase anodic relative to the most apical electrode (so-called PSA pulses), pitch was lower than when the first phase was anodic re the more basal electrode. For a pulse rate of 12 pulses per second (pps), pitch was also lower than with standard symmetric biphasic pulses in either monopolar or bipolar mode. This suggests that PSA pulses can extend the range of place-pitch percepts available to cochlear implant listeners by focusing the spread of excitation in a more apical region than common stimulation techniques. Temporal pitch was studied by requiring subjects to pitch-rank single-channel pulse trains with rates ranging from 105 to 1,156 pps; this task was repeated at several intra-cochlear stimulation sites and using both symmetric and pseudomonophasic pulses. For PSA pulses presented to apical electrodes, the upper limit of temporal pitch was significantly higher than that for all the other conditions, averaging 713 pps. Measures of discriminability obtained using the method of constant stimuli indicated that this pitch percept was probably weak. However, a multidimensional scaling study showed that the percept associated with a rate change, even at high rates, was orthogonal to that of a place change and therefore reflected a genuine change in the temporal pattern of neural activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21116672      PMCID: PMC3046333          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0248-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  49 in total

1.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effects of pulse rate on threshold and dynamic range in Clarion cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Gail S Donaldson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.

Authors:  J H Frijns; S L de Snoo; J H ten Kate
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains.

Authors:  C M McKay; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of spectral and nonspectral frequency difference limens for human and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  B E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey; Johan H M Frijns; Patrick R Axon; Randy K Kalkman; Patrick Boyle; David M Baguley; John Briggs; John M Deeks; Jeroen J Briaire; Xavier Barreau; René Dauman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05

9.  Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.

Authors:  Stefan Brill; Joachim Müller; Rudolf Hagen; Alexander Möltner; Steffi-Johanna Brockmeier; Thomas Stark; Silke Helbig; Jan Maurer; Thomas Zahnert; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp; Ilona Anderson; Stefan Strahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  42 in total

1.  Spectro-temporal templates unify the pitch percepts of resolved and unresolved harmonics.

Authors:  Shihab Shamma; Kelsey Dutta
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

3.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

4.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily R Spitzer; Sangsook Choi; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-31

6.  The relationship between time and place coding with cochlear implants with long electrode arrays.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Jeremy Marozeau; Griet Mertens; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Authors:  Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

10.  Training improves cochlear implant rate discrimination on a psychophysical task.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.