Literature DB >> 28634306

Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Luke A Johnson1, Charles C Della Santina1,2, Xiaoqin Wang3.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auditory periphery organ by cochlear implant (CI) generates highly synchronized inputs to the auditory system. It has long been thought such inputs would lead to highly synchronized neural firing along the ascending auditory pathway. However, neurophysiological studies with hearing animals have shown that the central auditory system progressively converts temporal representations of time-varying sounds to firing rate-based representations. It is not clear whether this coding principle also applies to highly synchronized CI inputs. Higher-frequency modulations in CI stimulation have been found to evoke largely transient responses with little sustained firing in previous studies of the primary auditory cortex (A1) in anesthetized animals. Here, we show that, in addition to neurons displaying synchronized firing to CI stimuli, a large population of A1 neurons in awake marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) responded to rapid time-varying CI stimulation with discharges that were not synchronized to CI stimuli, yet reflected changing repetition frequency by increased firing rate. Marmosets of both sexes were included in this study. By comparing directly each neuron's responses to time-varying acoustic and CI signals, we found that individual A1 neurons encode both modalities with similar firing patterns (stimulus-synchronized or nonsynchronized). These findings suggest that A1 neurons use the same basic coding schemes to represent time-varying acoustic or CI stimulation and provide new insights into mechanisms underlying how the brain processes natural sounds via a CI device.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In modern cochlear implant (CI) processors, the temporal information in speech or environmental sounds is delivered through modulated electric pulse trains. How the auditory cortex represents temporally modulated CI stimulation across multiple time scales has remained largely unclear. In this study, we compared directly neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex (A1) to time-varying acoustic and CI signals in awake marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). We found that A1 neurons encode both modalities using similar coding schemes, but some important differences were identified. Our results provide insights into mechanisms underlying how the brain processes sounds via a CI device and suggest a candidate neural code underlying rate-pitch perception limitations often observed in CI users.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/377008-15$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; cochlear implant; marmoset

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634306      PMCID: PMC5518426          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0093-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Stimulus induced and spontaneous rhythmic firing of single units in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; M W Raggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Passive stimulation and behavioral training differentially transform temporal processing in the inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Kenneth E Hancock; Kamal Sen; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Repetition rate and signal level effects on neuronal responses to brief tone pulses in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  D P Phillips; S E Hall; J L Hollett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A coding transformation for temporally structured sounds within auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Michael Wehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Behavioral training restores temporal processing in auditory cortex of long-deaf cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Temporal bone characterization and cochlear implant feasibility in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

Review 2.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.