Literature DB >> 17225420

The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: sensorineural hearing loss.

Joshua G W Bernstein1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This study tested the relationship between frequency selectivity and the minimum spacing between harmonics necessary for accurate fo discrimination. Fundamental frequency difference limens (fo DLs) were measured for ten listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and three normal-hearing listeners for sine- and random-phase harmonic complexes, bandpass filtered between 1500 and 3500 Hz, with fo's ranging from 75 to 500 Hz (or higher). All listeners showed a transition between small (good) fo DLs at high fo's and large (poor) fo DLs at low fo's, although the fo at which this transition occurred (fo,tr) varied across listeners. Three measures thought to reflect frequency selectivity were significantly correlated to both the fo,tr and the minimum fo DL achieved at high fo's: (1) the maximum fo for which fo DLs were phase dependent, (2) the maximum modulation frequency for which amplitude modulation and quasi-frequency modulation were discriminable, and (3) the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the auditory filter, estimated using the notched-noise method. These results provide evidence of a relationship between fo discrimination performance and frequency selectivity in listeners with SNHL, supporting "spectral" and "spectro-temporal" theories of pitch perception that rely on sharp tuning in the auditory periphery to accurately extract fo information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17225420     DOI: 10.1121/1.2372452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

3.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

4.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Impaired timing and frequency discrimination in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anjali Bhatara; Talin Babikian; Elizabeth Laugeson; Raffi Tachdjian; Yvonne S Sininger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-10

8.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

9.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.