Literature DB >> 31886698

Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Mark K Britton1, Brian A Anderson1.   

Abstract

Statistical regularities in distractor location trigger suppression of high-probability distractor locations during visual search. The degree to which such suppression reflects generalizable, persistent changes in a spatial priority map has not been examined. We demonstrate that suppression of high-probability distractor locations persists after location probabilities are equalized and likely reflects a genuine reshaping of the priority map rather than more transient effects of selection history. Statistically learned suppression generalizes across contexts within a task during learning but does not generalize between task paradigms using unrelated stimuli in identical spatial locations. These findings suggest that stimulus features do play a role in learned spatial suppression, potentially gating the weights applied to a spatial priority map. However, the binding of location to context during learning is not automatic, in contrast to the previously reported interaction of location-based statistical learning and stimulus features. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31886698      PMCID: PMC7456594          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  54 in total

1.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-10

2.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position.

Authors:  V Maljkovic; K Nakayama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

3.  On the representational nature of value-driven spatial attentional biases.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning.

Authors:  Leonardo Chelazzi; Jana Eštočinová; Riccardo Calletti; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Ilaria Sani; Chiara Della Libera; Elisa Santandrea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-05-11

8.  The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: evidence from contextual cuing.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Ian P Rasmussen; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  12 in total

1.  Context isn't everything: Search performance is influenced by the nature of the task but not the background.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Lana Mrkonja
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Punishment-modulated attentional capture is context specific.

Authors:  Laurent Grégoire; Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 5.  An adaptive view of attentional control.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-12

Review 6.  Gotcha: Working memory prioritization from automatic attentional biases.

Authors:  Susan M Ravizza; Katelyn M Conn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-15

7.  Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.

Authors:  Andy Kim; Brian Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  Distractor filtering is affected by local and global distractor probability, emerges very rapidly but is resistant to extinction.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Surprisingly inflexible: Statistically learned suppression of distractors generalizes across contexts.

Authors:  Jasper de Waard; Louisa Bogaerts; Dirk van Moorselaar; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression shape attentional priority according to different timeframes.

Authors:  Valeria Di Caro; Chiara Della Libera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.