Literature DB >> 29758478

Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.

Brian A Anderson1, Haena Kim2.   

Abstract

The role of associative reward learning in the guidance of feature-based attention is well established. The extent to which reward learning can modulate spatial attention has been much more controversial. At least one demonstration of a persistent spatial attention bias following space-based associative reward learning has been reported. At the same time, multiple other experiments have been published failing to demonstrate enduring attentional biases towards locations at which a target, if found, yields high reward. This is in spite of evidence that participants use reward structures to inform their decisions where to search, leading some to suggest that, unlike feature-based attention, spatial attention may be impervious to the influence of learning from reward structures. Here, we demonstrate a robust bias towards regions of a scene that participants were previously rewarded for selecting. This spatial bias relies on representations that are anchored to the configuration of objects within a scene. The observed bias appears to be driven specifically by reinforcement learning, and can be observed with equal strength following non-reward corrective feedback. The time course of the bias is consistent with a transient shift of attention, rather than a strategic search pattern, and is evident in eye movement patterns during free viewing. Taken together, our findings reconcile previously conflicting reports and offer an integrative account of how learning from feedback shapes the spatial attention system.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Real world scenes; Reward learning; Selective attention; Spatial attention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29758478     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Authors:  Chisato Mine; Takemasa Yokoyama; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

4.  Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.077

5.  Dynamic modulation of neural feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Celina Pütz; Berry van den Berg; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 6.  An adaptive view of attentional control.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2021-12

7.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Gotcha: Working memory prioritization from automatic attentional biases.

Authors:  Susan M Ravizza; Katelyn M Conn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-15

9.  Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-07

10.  Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.