Literature DB >> 24948813

Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning.

Leonardo Chelazzi1, Jana Eštočinová2, Riccardo Calletti3, Emanuele Lo Gerfo4, Ilaria Sani3, Chiara Della Libera3, Elisa Santandrea3.   

Abstract

Spatial priority maps are real-time representations of the behavioral salience of locations in the visual field, resulting from the combined influence of stimulus driven activity and top-down signals related to the current goals of the individual. They arbitrate which of a number of (potential) targets in the visual scene will win the competition for attentional resources. As a result, deployment of visual attention to a specific spatial location is determined by the current peak of activation (corresponding to the highest behavioral salience) across the map. Here we report a behavioral study performed on healthy human volunteers, where we demonstrate that spatial priority maps can be shaped via reward-based learning, reflecting long-lasting alterations (biases) in the behavioral salience of specific spatial locations. These biases exert an especially strong influence on performance under conditions where multiple potential targets compete for selection, conferring competitive advantage to targets presented in spatial locations associated with greater reward during learning relative to targets presented in locations associated with lesser reward. Such acquired biases of spatial attention are persistent, are nonstrategic in nature, and generalize across stimuli and task contexts. These results suggest that reward-based attentional learning can induce plastic changes in spatial priority maps, endowing these representations with the "intelligent" capacity to learn from experience.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/348594-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cross-target competition; reward-based learning; spatial attention; spatial priority maps

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948813      PMCID: PMC6608215          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0277-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  57 in total

1.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Independent effects of reward expectation and spatial orientation on the processing of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou; Ping Wei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The neural instantiation of a priority map.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Koorosh Mirpour
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

4.  Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Authors:  Chisato Mine; Takemasa Yokoyama; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Habitual versus goal-driven attention.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015

7.  Reward learning biases the direction of saccades.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-11-27

8.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Visual Attention.

Authors:  John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 6.422

9.  Task-Irrelevant Visual Forms Facilitate Covert and Overt Spatial Selection.

Authors:  Amarender R Bogadhi; Antimo Buonocore; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.