Literature DB >> 35112310

Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.

Andy Kim1, Brian Anderson2.   

Abstract

Despite our best intentions, physically salient but entirely task-irrelevant stimuli can sometimes capture our attention. With learning, it is possible to more efficiently ignore such stimuli, although specifically how the visual system accomplishes this remains to be clarified. Using a sample of young-adult participants, we examined the time course of eye movements to targets and distractors. We replicate a reduced frequency of eye movements to the distractor when appearing in a location at which distractors are frequently encountered. This reduction was observed even for the earliest saccades, when selection tends to be most stimulus-driven. When the distractor appeared at the high-probability location, saccadic reaction time was slowed specifically for distractor-going saccades, suggesting a slowing of priority accumulation at this location. In the event that the distractor was fixated, disengagement from the distractor was also faster when it appeared in the high-probability location. Both proactive and reactive mechanisms of distractor suppression work together to minimize attentional capture by frequently encountered distractors.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Eye movements; Selection history; Selective attention; Signal suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35112310      PMCID: PMC9343477          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02050-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Nicholas E Diquattro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Effects of salience are short-lived.

Authors:  Mieke Donk; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-07

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Benchi Wang; Christian Olivers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the representational nature of value-driven spatial attentional biases.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-04

7.  On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Mark K Britton
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

8.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement.

Authors:  Sabine Born; Dirk Kerzel; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Lana Mrkonja
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.