Literature DB >> 20675793

Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Risa Sawaki1, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

There is considerable controversy about whether salient singletons capture attention in a bottom-up fashion, irrespective of top-down control settings. One possibility is that salient singletons always generate an attention capture signal, but this signal can be actively suppressed to avoid capture. In the present study, we investigated this issue by using event-related potential recordings, focusing on N2pc (N2-posterior-contralateral; a measure of attentional deployment) and Pd (distractor positivity; a measure of attentional suppression). Participants searched for a specific letter within one of two regions, and irrelevant color singletons were sometimes present. We found that the irrelevant singletons did not elicit N2pc but instead elicited Pd; this occurred equally within the attended and unattended regions. These findings suggest that salient singletons may automatically produce an attend-to-me signal, irrespective of top-down control settings, but this signal can be overridden by an active suppression process to prevent the actual capture of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675793      PMCID: PMC3705921          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  76 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Spatial attention in early vision.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; P Atchley
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-06

3.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Laura Zwaan; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

5.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Jens Schwarzbach; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?

Authors:  Jaap Munneke; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-26

7.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form.

Authors:  R Desimone; S J Schein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Attentional preparation for a lateralized visual distractor: behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  88 in total

1.  Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.

Authors:  Daniel B Vatterott; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  John M Gaspar; Gregory J Christie; David J Prime; Pierre Jolicœur; John J McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

6.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The Temporal Cascade of Neural Processes Underlying Target Detection and Attentional Processing During Auditory Search.

Authors:  Marissa L Gamble; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

10.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.