Literature DB >> 29191511

The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Nicholas Gaspelin1, Steven J Luck2.   

Abstract

Researchers have long debated whether salient stimuli can involuntarily 'capture' visual attention. We review here evidence for a recently discovered inhibitory mechanism that may help to resolve this debate. This evidence suggests that salient stimuli naturally attempt to capture attention, but capture can be avoided if the salient stimulus is suppressed before it captures attention. Importantly, the suppression process can be more or less effective as a result of changing task demands or lapses in cognitive control. Converging evidence for the existence of this suppression mechanism comes from multiple sources, including psychophysics, eye-tracking, and event-related potentials (ERPs). We conclude that the evidence for suppression is strong, but future research will need to explore the nature and limits of this mechanism.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention capture; inhibition; suppression; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29191511      PMCID: PMC5742040          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  85 in total

1.  Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized.

Authors:  Michael Zehetleitner; Harriet Goschy; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

3.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Steven J Luck; Kai Boelmans; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Carsten N Boehler; Jochem Rieger; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Laura Zwaan; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

5.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Anna Grubert; Anders Petersen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding.

Authors:  Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Melissa Saenz; Giedrius T Buracas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  70 in total

1.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Gating by induced Α-Γ asynchrony in selective attention.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Martha Forloines; Zhiheng Zhou; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Failures in top-down control in schizophrenia revealed by patterns of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Sonia Bansal; Benjamin M Robinson; Carly J Leonard; Britta Hahn; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 7.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention.

Authors:  Joshua William Maxwell; Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-04

9.  Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Authors:  Mohsen Rafiei; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; David Whitney; Árni Kristjánsson; Andrey Chetverikov
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.