Literature DB >> 20731525

The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: evidence from contextual cuing.

Daniel I Brooks1, Ian P Rasmussen, Andrew Hollingworth.   

Abstract

In a contextual cuing paradigm, we examined how memory for the spatial structure of a natural scene guides visual search. Participants searched through arrays of objects that were embedded within depictions of real-world scenes. If a repeated search array was associated with a single scene during study, then array repetition produced significant contextual cuing. However, expression of that learning was dependent on instantiating the original scene in which the learning occurred: Contextual cuing was disrupted when the repeated array was transferred to a different scene. Such scene-specific learning was not absolute, however. Under conditions of high scene variability, repeated search array were learned independently of the scene background. These data suggest that when a consistent environmental structure is available, spatial representations supporting visual search are organized hierarchically, with memory for functional subregions of an environment nested within a representation of the larger scene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731525      PMCID: PMC3163502          DOI: 10.1037/a0019257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Population HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: applicable models and inferential tools for virological data from AIDS clinical trials.

Authors:  H Wu; A A Ding
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Descriptions and depictions of environments.

Authors:  H A Taylor; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

3.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing--configuration or individual locations?

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Laura C Wagner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-04

5.  Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory.

Authors:  T P McNamara; J K Hardy; S C Hirtle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention.

Authors:  Derrick Parkhurst; Klinton Law; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; A Speakman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.

Authors:  S C Hirtle; J Jonides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-05

10.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  R G Morris; P Garrud; J N Rawlins; J O'Keefe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

2.  Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

3.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

4.  Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Context isn't everything: Search performance is influenced by the nature of the task but not the background.

Authors:  Brett A Cochrane; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Scene-based contextual cueing in pigeons.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Yuejia Teng; Daniel I Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Toward isolating the role of dopamine in the acquisition of incentive salience attribution.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Justin R Nickell; Mahesh Darna; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Isolating the incentive salience of reward-associated stimuli: value, choice, and persistence.

Authors:  Joshua S Beckmann; Jonathan J Chow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.