| Literature DB >> 31799171 |
Hadeer Mostafa El Feky1, Khalid Mohammed Ezzat1, Marwa Mahmoud Ali Bedier1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the flexural cyclic fatigue resistance and the length of the fractured segments (FLs) of recently introduced M-Pro rotary files with that of RaCe rotary files in curved canals and to evaluate the fracture surface by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Entities:
Keywords: Canals; Flexural resistance; Fracture; Instruments; Microscopy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799171 PMCID: PMC6875542 DOI: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e44
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Restor Dent Endod ISSN: 2234-7658
Figure 1File attached to the contra-angled hand piece and inserted within the simulated canal, fixed to the lower compartment of the testing machine.
The mean, standard deviation (SD), range, and results of the independent Student's t-test comparing the number of cycles to failure (NCF) and the fractured segment length (FL) between the 2 tested groups (M-Pro and RaCe)
| Variable | M-Pro (n = 18) | RaCe (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| NCF | 3,380.6 ± 1,221.7 | 1,170–6,605 | 404.1 ± 127.0 | 250–585 | 0.05* |
| FL (mm) | 3.4 ± 0.9 | 1.2–4.6 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 2.4–4.3 | 0.488 |
*Indicates significance at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2(A) A scanning electron micrograph of the fractured surface (cross-sectional view) of a representative sample of the M-Pro group after cyclic fatigue testing using low magnification (×400) shows the general features of cyclic fatigue failure such as fatigue zones followed by an overload zone (fast fracture) with numerous dimples, microvoids, fatigue striations, and fracture lines extending on different planes, indicating multiple crack origins, in addition to crack propagation at the smooth area. (B) Using high magnification (×1,500), the surface details were clearer, including irregular morphology, an extensive rough dimpled surface, microporosities, microvoids, fatigue striations, and multiple microcracks. (C) A scanning electron micrograph of the lateral surface of a representative sample of the M-Pro group using low magnification (×300) shows multiple cracks and surface irregularities. (D) Using higher magnification (×600), extensive cracks can be seen.
Figure 3(A) A scanning electron micrograph of the fractured surface (cross-sectional view) of a representative sample of the RaCe group after cyclic fatigue testing using low magnification (×400) shows the general features of cyclic fatigue failure, such as fatigue zones followed by an overload zone (fast fracture), with numerous dimples and microvoids. (B) Using higher magnification (×1,500), microvoids can be seen beside the dimples, but to a lesser extent than in the M-Pro group. (C) A scanning electron micrograph of the lateral surface of a representative sample of the RaCe group using low magnification (×300) shows a smooth surface with no sign of plastic deformation. (D) Using a higher magnification (×600), a smooth surface can be seen with a small number of microcracks.